
Is Brendan Haywood Really Worried About Starbury’s Sexuality or Something Else?

The↵weirdest part about all those Brendan Haywood/Etan Thomas feuds in the↵Washington locker room? While Thomas’s outspokenness is well, if not↵over, documented, Haywood too is not afraid to speak his mind about↵issues around the league. With Etan exiled to OKC, Brendan’s left to↵pick the slack.↵
↵
↵And boy, has he ever. Speaking to Hardcore Sports Radio (transcribed by Sports Radio Interviews), Haywood just let it all loose on the subject of Marbury’s you-know-what and the Twitter craze:↵↵⇥“At first it was cool, but after a while it just became disturbing. He’s on YouTube crying with no shirt on for no reason,↵⇥sweating while his boy’s rubbing his shoulders. What’s that about?↵⇥That’s like gay porn. I don’t understand it. He’s dancing to a song↵⇥called ‘Barbie Doll’, doing like stripper moves. I have no idea what’s↵⇥going on with the guy, it’s almost like he’s trying to end his own↵⇥career. There’s not a GM out there that would touch Marbury right now…↵⇥Have you seen the ‘Barbie Doll’ clip? Click on YouTube and go to Barbie↵⇥Doll. There’s no way any other professional athletes would wanna get↵⇥dressed around this guy, because you gotta think something is a little,↵⇥he’s swinging from both sides of the fence.”↵↵The key progression there? “At first it was cool . . .↵after a while it just became disturbing . . . he’s swinging from both↵sides of the fence.” So Haywood is for absolute transparency, until the↵guy starts showing off the deepest recesses of his soul, and once↵that’s crossed, it’s time to retreat to old jock standbys like↵homophobia. Or at least hurtful stereotypes, and the “no team wants a↵gay in the locker room” sleeping giant. It’s like Haywood likes the↵idea in principle, just not when someone like Marbury actually ends up↵having some real weirdness to show off.↵
↵
↵
And↵herein might lie the fundamental Twitter/new media paradox for↵athletes. Be yourself, but not the part we won’t approve of, or any↵part we don’t expect. Elsewhere in the interview, Haywood turns his↵nose up at Kevin Love’s Twitter-tale-ing. Like dude, what are you↵doing? Play your position and stop acting like some kind of crusader↵for the free flow of information or enhanced access to the NBA↵experience. That’s a lot deeper than this is supposed to go!↵
↵
↵Not that I think Haywood’s really mature comments on Marbury tell↵us anything about Steph’s sexuality (sidenote: wasn’t Dennis Rodman admittedly bi↵when he was winning rings?). But if someone were to be outted by name,↵or blind item-ed, couldn’t it come from a spiteful or frightened↵teammate? Twitter does have the potential to, however intermittently,↵turn into a source of prime NBA gossip. Or at least, for Haywood,↵looking at what’s happened to Marbury, why wouldn’t these fears be↵brewing? That Haywood’s more worried about others’ sexuality than his↵own doesn’t mask the fact that this level of exposure loosens the reins↵of control in a way that might scare some players.↵
↵
↵What if an unhinged Marbury starts dishing dirt on others? What if↵he outs someone? What if someone had blithely outted the “gay” (or just↵plain nuts) Marbury before this? For all the eagerness NBA stars have↵shown to share themselves with the world—perhaps to correct the thug↵stereotypes and post-Jordan blandness that have both worked to make the↵league interesting—there’s a hell of a lot going on that’s yet to get↵out. But it could, if there’s not someone helping these guys manage↵their message. That, and not confusion over Marbury’s supposedly “gay”↵behavior, might be the anxiety at the root of Haywood’s rant.
↵
↵
For more NBA coverage, visit SportingNews.com's new NBA blog, The Baseline.
↵
This post originally appeared on the Sporting Blog. For more, see The Sporting Blog Archives.
See More:











