The Rumble↵is SportingNews.com’s new fight blog covering the worlds of boxing and↵MMA. Head over there and welcome Dave and his crew to the site.
↵
↵
Mayweather vs. Pacquiao: Doing the Math

↵
↵We↵are fickle people, us boxing heads, and now, having worshipped at the↵altar of Manny Pacquiao for most of the year, we find ourselves in a↵place that few anticipated. I certainly did not. I went into the↵Mayweather/Marquez fight confident that Floyd would win and that he↵would do it convincingly. I did not, however, for a moment expect that↵he would do it so convincingly that in the aftermath we would↵have reason to doubt whether we were even interested in a↵Mayweather/Pacquiao superfight at all.
↵
↵But that is where we are.↵Whether you buy it or not, there’s at least an argument to be made on↵that score, and it’s being made all over the internet. Pacquiao fought↵Marquez twice and both times they were essentially ties. In the first↵fight Pac scored three touchdowns in the first two minutes of the game↵and Marquez came back to tie the game with a series of field goals over↵the next 58. In the second fight, they matched each other touchdown for↵touchdown the entire game and according to the judges Pacquiao kicked a↵field goal with time running out. All we can conclude from this is that↵the two teams are dead even.
↵
↵This past Saturday night, Floyd↵beat up on Marquez like the Niners beat the Chargers that one Super↵Bowl where Steve Young threw about nineteen touchdown passes to Jerry↵Rice and assorted members of Jerry Rice’s family. He beat Marquez like↵the Steelers playing a Div 1-A team.
↵
↵
And↵so, by the commutative property, this equation is now on the table:↵Mayweather > Marquez (by like infinity), Marquez = Pacquiao (give or↵take), therefore Mayweather > Pacquiao (by like infinity).
↵
↵Even↵taking into account the weight issue, I still think it’s reasonable↵that people are drawing such a conclusion. The only concrete way we↵have to assess fighters who haven’t fought each other is to look at how↵they’ve done against similar opponents.
↵
↵But if we’re going to do↵that, we have to bring the same method of inspection to Floyd and↵Manny’s other two common opponents, De La Hoya and Hatton.
↵
↵Hatton↵to my mind is a push. Yes Pacquiao blew him out of the arena, but that↵is the way Pacquiao fights. Floyd never blows anyone out of the arena.↵I have a feeling that if Floyd were fighting, I don’t know, Alfonso↵Gomez, he would take a couple of rounds to get his rhythm. Floyd↵dominated Hatton and then knocked him out with a devastating shot. That↵Pacquiao did it quicker does not earn him any style points in my book.
↵
↵De↵La Hoya, however, is a different story. It is without question that↵Oscar gave Floyd some problems, particularly early in the fight. Those↵problems to my eyes were merely a question of Oscar’s size. I don’t↵remember the unofficial weights that night, but I do recall that the↵fight looked like a middleweight fighting a welter. And I remember↵seeing a look in Floyd’s eyes early on that I haven’t seen there very↵often, a look not of fear exactly, but definitely of concern. Oscar was↵jumping on him and trying to mug him in there with his sheer mass, and↵the advantage that he had in the mass department made it briefly seem↵like it might be a doable venture.
↵
↵Of course, it wasn’t in the↵end. Floyd got his bearings, and Oscar lost heart, wearied of chasing↵Floyd around and eating potshots as his reward for trying to close the↵distance. As I wrote at the time of the fight, “at the very point at↵which Joe Frazier used to SERIOUSLY start to stalk his prey, Oscar↵effectively gave up.” He got himself a split decision for his efforts↵that I thought was highly dubious - I don’t have my scorecard on hand,↵but in my memory I scored it 8-4 in rounds for Floyd, and I thought I↵was being generous to Oscar with that.
↵
↵Pacquiao, though, needed↵no scorecards with De La Hoya. He blew him out of the arena too,↵embarrassed him, made him quit on his stool and then made him quit↵forever.
↵
↵The disparity between Manny and Floyd’s performances↵against Oscar is not quite so great as the one between their↵performances against Marquez. But they’re definitely in the same↵ballpark. And if, as I am inclined to do, one is going to explain that↵disparity away for one fight based on the weight issue, then we have to↵be prepared to do the same for the other. I fully believe that Floyd↵had a tougher time with Oscar than Pacquiao did because he was fighting↵him at a weight at which Oscar was comfortable. I am quite sure that if↵Floyd had fought the version of De La Hoya that Manny did at 147 (or in↵Oscar’s case 145) pounds, he would have schooled him like he did↵Marquez.
↵
↵But there is no question that the same is true of the↵Marquez comparison. Pacquiao had more troubles with Marquez because he↵was fighting him at the weight that Marquez’s body is right for. What↵would happen if the 130-pound Mayweather of ten years ago fought the↵130-pound Marquez of March, 2008? Well, it’s hard to say. I tend to↵think that Floyd would still win, and still win pretty easily. I just↵think Marquez sets up very well for him irrespective of weight. But I↵certainly think it would be a closer contest than the one we saw↵Saturday night.
↵
↵Finally, we have to face the fact that the↵boxing commutative property never has been anything but a parlor game,↵and is far, far from being an immutable law. We have recent, shocking↵evidence of this in the sequence of Margarito > Cotto, Cotto >↵Mosley (barely) and therefore… no. It didn’t work out. Mosley >↵Margarito (by a lot) and we’re back to the drawing board.
↵
↵Then↵there’s the most famous example of the flawed equation: Frazier = Ali,↵Foreman > Frazier (by a LOT) and therefore… The Rumble in the Jungle↵and the world-shocking and whatnot.
↵
↵Still, I think even if we’re↵going to play the commutative property game with Mayweather and↵Pacquiao right now, we have to have longer memories and consider De La↵Hoya as well as Marquez as our test examples. If we deem one of these↵cases to be invalid due to questions of weight, then we must do the↵same with the other.
↵
↵Where it comes out, for me, is that I’m↵still VERY interested in Pacquiao vs. Mayweather, granted of course↵that Pac beats Cotto, which maybe we are right in thinking today is↵even a bigger “if” than we did a week ago. That said, if Pac does beat↵Cotto, however he does it, the Mayweather fight will seem even more of↵an imperative. Shane Mosley makes a compelling case on his own behalf↵for the Floyd fight, and he may be able to beat either Pacquiao or↵Mayweather. I myself think how he would fare against Pacquiao would↵depend on the weight - 140 seems to me too low for a 38-year-old man↵who has looked more than comfortable in the past at 154. Mayweather…↵right now I admit that I think Mayweather could handle Sugar Shane with↵conviction.
↵
↵But here’s the fact - Pacquiao and Mayweather are↵the two biggest names in the sport and the two guys that are vying for↵the pound-for-pound title out there in the world. Mayweather is↵undefeated. Pacquiao is on a breathtaking run of dominance. In↵conclusion, though I see why many are balking at the matchup in the↵aftermath of the Mayweather/Marquez rout, I’m still very much of the↵opinion that the most interesting fight in boxing right now is Pac and↵Money, and I very much hope it happens.
↵
↵Provided, of course, that Pacquiao beats Cotto…↵
This post originally appeared on the Sporting Blog. For more, see The Sporting Blog Archives.











