Bonus: Click through for a team-by-team rating on how each club stacks up
State of MLS facilities: where things stand on stadium development


People who regularly read my work – both of them – probably grow weary of me harping and hounding on stadium development. But I harp and hound for a reason. Nothing is more important for development of the domestic game. These physical structures greatly enhance financial footing and do wonders in establishing a sense of community permanence, something pro soccer has always lacked.
(It also says to the soccer haters: "Screw you, we’re here to stay. So go hide in the forest with the rest of the xenophobic jackholes and douchey ding dongs who always want to know ‘Why can’t things just be the way they used to be?’ ")
Whoa! I guess I’m feeling a bit aggressive today.
Any-who, ground has been broken on a new stadium in
Meanwhile, the Portland Timbers organization is moving forward with needed renovations to
As I’ve noted before,
So, it seems like a good time to review the state of MLS facility development. After all, even some of the best soccer fans aren’t all stadium geeks like me. I know it’s hard to keep up. So click forth for a chart-type thingy on where MLS stands in this critical development initiative.
Chivas
D.C. United – Where things stand: Good grief, what a mess. Pressure point: The effort to find a stadium solution is a years-long tale of fits and stops. RFK continues to be a good place for atmosphere, but that’s about it. The inability to make money there is a serious drag on MLS and, certainly, pro soccer in the nation’s capital. At some point, this thing has to get solved, or United will have to pack up and go elsewhere. And wouldn’t that be sad? Rating: 3 Stadium-stars out of 5.
FC Dallas – Where things stand:
Red Bull











