Skip to main content
Come Fan with UsSaturday, June 27, 2026

Report: White Sox Won’t Exercise Peavy Option

Chicago, IL, USA; Chicago White Sox starting pitcher Jake Peavy (44) takes the field against the Detroit Tigers in the first inning at US Cellular Field. Mandatory Credit: Mike DiNovo-US PRESSWIRE
Chicago, IL, USA; Chicago White Sox starting pitcher Jake Peavy (44) takes the field against the Detroit Tigers in the first inning at US Cellular Field. Mandatory Credit: Mike DiNovo-US PRESSWIRE
Chicago, IL, USA; Chicago White Sox starting pitcher Jake Peavy (44) takes the field against the Detroit Tigers in the first inning at US Cellular Field. Mandatory Credit: Mike DiNovo-US PRESSWIRE

Three years ago at the trade deadline, the Chicago White Sox traded for Jake Peavy.

Yay! Peavy was a really good pitcher!

The White Sox also traded for Jake Peavy's contract.

Uh-oh. That contract had three seasons and $52 million guaranteed. Which seemed like a lot of money when Peavy went 14-13 over the next two seasons, with a 4.77 ERA. He was, putting it quite frankly, a colossal waste of many millions of dollars in both 2010 and ‘11.

There’s sort of a happy ending, though. Peavy’s making $17 million this season, and he’s almost sort of been worth it. Peavy was an All-Star this summer, and he currently ranks eighth in strikeouts and ERA, sixth in strikeout-to-walk ratio. If the White Sox hang on and win the A.L. Central, Peavy’s probably worth that $17 million, especially if he makes two or three good starts in October.

And it doesn’t have to be an ending. The White Sox can have Peavy next season, too, if they want. According to Jon Heyman, they don’t really want:

Word is the White Sox have signaled to Peavy they are unlikely to pick up his $22 million club option for 2013, meaning they’d pay the $4 million buyout and effectively make him a free agent.

The White Sox may yet try to re-sign Peavy after declining that high option. But it’s not easy to envision them paying him enough to entice him to re-sign before the free-agency period.

This seems an odd move, considering that the real cost of retaining Peavy would be $18 million rather than $22 million; they’re spending that other $4 million either way. I think you don’t exercise the option if a) you’ve got somebody who’s roughly as good, but cheaper, or b) you think that Peavy won’t be as good next year.

I’m wondering which of those applies here.

See More:

More in General

GeneralFromPosting and Toasting
An SB Nation New Yorker needs our helpAn SB Nation New Yorker needs our help
GeneralFromPosting and Toasting
General
Sabastian Sawe breaks 2-hour barrier, shatters marathon world recordSabastian Sawe breaks 2-hour barrier, shatters marathon world record
General

The mythical two-hour mark was broken at the London Marathon.

By Bernd Buchmasser
A Huge Dog
THE HISTORY OF CHARGING THE MOUND, EPISODE 1THE HISTORY OF CHARGING THE MOUND, EPISODE 1
Play
General
Super Bowl 60 coin toss resultsSuper Bowl 60 coin toss results
General

The Seahawks and Patriots will open the Super Bowl with the coin toss to determine who starts with the ball. We have the full coin toss results for Super Bowl 60.

By David Fucillo
General
Marc Marquez completes a comeback for the agesMarc Marquez completes a comeback for the ages
General

MotoGP’s Marc Marquez completed a comeback for the ages with his 2025 title

By Mark Schofield
General
How to make sure SBNation.com appears in your Google search resultsHow to make sure SBNation.com appears in your Google search results