Skip to main content
Come Fan with UsSaturday, June 20, 2026

2016 Taxslayer Bowl stats preview: Georgia Tech vs. Kentucky advanced tale of the tape

Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets (8-4) vs. Kentucky Wildcats (7-5)

December 31, 2016 ( 11:00 AM ET, ESPN )
Spread: Georgia Tech -3.5
S&P+ Projection: Georgia Tech (34.1-29.0)

Confused? Check out the advanced-stats glossary here.
Statistical profiles index.
Full Football Outsiders F/+ rankings can be found here.

The Basics
Category Georgia Tech Kentucky
S&P+ (Rk) 50 59
Category Georgia Tech offense Kentucky defense Kentucky offense Georgia Tech defense
Yards per play (Rk) 6.33 (19) 5.85 (92) 6.11 (30) 5.59 (72)
Yards per game (Rk) 385.0 (86) 434.3 (83) 423.5 (59) 402.8 (57)
Points per possession (Rk) 2.55 (41) 2.44 (88) 2.37 (53) 2.22 (74)
Category Georgia Tech offense Kentucky defense Kentucky offense Georgia Tech defense
S&P+ (Rk) 33.2 (44) 32.0 (87) 32.2 (47) 28.9 (61)
Rushing S&P+ (Rk) 119.3 (15) 90.3 (105) 123.5 (10) 88.1 (111)
Passing S&P+ (Rk) 127.4 (11) 96.0 (81) 101.3 (65) 94.7 (85)
Standard Downs S&P+ (Rk) 114.2 (23) 97.5 (75) 114.2 (24) 90.8 (104)
Passing Downs S&P+ (Rk) 121.4 (18) 83.3 (118) 108.1 (51) 94.3 (90)
Q1 S&P+ (Rk) 129.9 (13) 95.4 (84) 116.5 (32) 85.9 (114)
Q2 S&P+ (Rk) 116.8 (33) 91.8 (97) 101.2 (71) 99.3 (74)
Q3 S&P+ (Rk) 102.5 (59) 87.9 (116) 129.8 (10) 93.5 (95)
Q4 S&P+ (Rk) 120.9 (8) 90.6 (102) 108.1 (42) 89.1 (109)
Five biggest advantages* (according to the advanced stats)

* or smallest disadvantages

Georgia Tech

  1. Second Down S&P+ (No. 16 offense vs. No. 123 defense)
  2. Passing Downs Explosiveness (IsoPPP) (No. 12 offense vs. No. 115 defense)
  3. Adj. Line Yards (No. 23 offense vs. No. 123 defense)
  4. Passing Downs S&P+ (No. 18 offense vs. No. 118 defense)
  5. Rushing S&P+ (No. 15 offense vs. No. 105 defense)

Kentucky

  1. Adj. Line Yards (No. 5 offense vs. No. 121 defense)
  2. Rushing Efficiency (Success Rate) (No. 11 offense vs. No. 119 defense)
  3. Rushing S&P+ (No. 10 offense vs. No. 111 defense)
  4. Standard Downs Efficiency (Success Rate) (No. 16 offense vs. No. 116 defense)
  5. Rushing Explosiveness (IsoPPP) (No. 12 offense vs. No. 98 defense)
Five Factors
Category Georgia Tech offense Kentucky defense Kentucky offense Georgia Tech defense
EXPLOSIVENESS 1.50 (2) 1.16 (18) 1.45 (6) 1.14 (11)
EFFICIENCY 42.4% (66) 47.7% (117) 42.1% (72) 46.7% (114)
FIELD POSITION 29.2 (74) 29.6 (78) 29.0 (79) 28.2 (44)
FINISHING DRIVES 4.7 (45) 4.6 (72) 4.9 (33) 4.3 (50)
TURNOVER MARGIN EXPECTED:
Georgia Tech -2.81 (92)
Kentucky -2.18 (87)
ACTUAL
Georgia Tech 3 (43)
Kentucky -6 (106)
Offensive Footprint
Category (Rk) Georgia Tech offense Kentucky offense
Adj. Pace -9.0 (125) -3.3 (91)
Plays per game 60.8 (128) 69.3 (104)
Possessions per game 10.9 (127) 13.1 (56)
Std. Downs Run Rate 84.9% (4) 69.4% (13)
Pass. Downs Run Rate 57.8% (4) 41.2% (21)
% of solo tackles 81.2% (17) 76.4% (43)
Defensive Footprint
Category (Rk) Georgia Tech defense Kentucky defense
Std. Downs Run Rate 57.1% (91) 64.4% (27)
Pass. Downs Run Rate 37.9% (32) 41.2% (13)
Overall Havoc Rate 11.9% (123) 13.4% (104)
Front 7 Havoc Rate 6.6% (119) 8.1% (83)
DB Havoc Rate 5.3% (100) 5.3% (98)
PD to INC 26.8% (119) 31.7% (80)

When Georgia Tech has the ball…

Standard Downs
Georgia Tech Offense Kentucky Defense
Avg. Rk Avg. Rk Edge
Standard Downs S&P+ 114.2 23 97.5 75 Georgia Tech big
Standard Downs Success Rate 49.2 41 52.4 117 Georgia Tech big
Standard Downs IsoPPP 1.30 7 1.00 21 Georgia Tech
SD Line Yards per Carry 3.08 54 3.62 127 Georgia Tech big
SD Sack Rate 7.8% 116 5.2% 57 Kentucky big
Passing Downs
Georgia Tech Offense Kentucky Defense
Avg. Rk Avg. Rk Edge
Passing Downs S&P+ 121.4 18 83.3 118 Georgia Tech big
Passing Downs Success Rate 28.4 97 36.3 120 Georgia Tech
Passing Downs IsoPPP 2.23 2 1.67 48 Georgia Tech
PD Line Yards per Carry 3.10 82 3.84 115 Georgia Tech
PD Sack Rate 9.3% 89 8.3% 51 Kentucky

When Kentucky has the ball…

Standard Downs
Kentucky Offense Georgia Tech Defense
Avg. Rk Avg. Rk Edge
Standard Downs S&P+ 114.2 24 90.8 104 Kentucky big
Standard Downs Success Rate 48.6 54 51.9 114 Kentucky big
Standard Downs IsoPPP 1.27 14 1.01 16
SD Line Yards per Carry 3.34 16 3.35 113 Kentucky big
SD Sack Rate 5.4% 78 3.6% 99 Kentucky
Passing Downs
Kentucky Offense Georgia Tech Defense
Avg. Rk Avg. Rk Edge
Passing Downs S&P+ 108.1 51 94.3 90 Kentucky
Passing Downs Success Rate 28.3 101 33.7 96
Passing Downs IsoPPP 2.07 9 1.69 37 Kentucky
PD Line Yards per Carry 3.86 15 3.26 67 Kentucky big
PD Sack Rate 9.8% 98 3.8% 120 Kentucky

Stats via SportSource Analytics

College Football
The NCAA can appeal Brendan Sorsby’s shocking reinstatement, but Texas law isn’t on their sideThe NCAA can appeal Brendan Sorsby’s shocking reinstatement, but Texas law isn’t on their side
College Football

A big can of worms has been opened in college sports

By Mark Schofield
College Football
Here’s your first look at ‘College Football 27’ and ‘Madden 27’Here’s your first look at ‘College Football 27’ and ‘Madden 27’
College Football

Mascot game! Tush push!

By James Dator
NFL
Brendan Sorsby’s gambling allegations could end his college football career. Is NFL Supplemental Draft next?Brendan Sorsby’s gambling allegations could end his college football career. Is NFL Supplemental Draft next?
NFL

Brendan Sorsby calls out NCAA hypocrisy as his football future is uncertain

By Mark Schofield
College Football
NAACP urges black athletes to reject recruiting in racially gerrymandered statesNAACP urges black athletes to reject recruiting in racially gerrymandered states
College Football

The NAACP is asking athletes to take up the fight for voting rights.

By James Dator
College Football
Oregon coach asks recruits about their favorite ice cream, and it actually makes senseOregon coach asks recruits about their favorite ice cream, and it actually makes sense
College Football

Oregon coaches have a strange question for potential recruits.

By Mark Schofield
NFL
Why Jeremiyah Love brings top-5 value to NFL Draft as a RBWhy Jeremiyah Love brings top-5 value to NFL Draft as a RB
NFL

The Notre Dame star is the rare running back worth a top-10 or even top-5 pick.

By Mark Schofield