Beer probably started as a way to productively use old bread, and soon gained religious and cultural significance. Chang is a Tibetan beer and Chicha is a corn beer and kumis is a drink produced from fermented camel milk. The great Nordic epic, the Edda, reserved wine for the gods; mortals had to make do with beer. By the 16th century Europeans had settled on the great trinity of contemporary beer making, wheat, barley, and hops. America took beer to its high point, cold brewing to keep it clear, and by 1880 there were 2,500 breweries across the nation.
The connection to sports came at about the same time. Around 1880 Chris Von der Ahe, a St. Louis saloon owner, figured out that sales jumped when the Browns were playing. So he bought a piece of the team and started selling his product. He became the Bill Veeck/Al Davis of his time, putting a horse racing track inside the park, had a messy divorce, and saw his park, the old Sportsman’s Field, burn down. By age 61 he was dead of cirrhosis of the liver. Other beer barons followed, from the Yankees’ Jacob Ruppert to the Busch family in St. Louis who brought us Spuds MacKenzie and mass marketing, to Labatt in Ontario, the Coors in Colorado, and more.
What's made it a problem is the decades of its rampant abuse at venues and sports bars alike.
The affinity of sports fans for beer is not hard to figure, as a matter of history or human pleasure. What’s made it a problem is the decades of its rampant abuse at venues and sports bars alike, aided and abetted by the sanctioned marketing and selling of a lucrative commodity.
The alcohol in beer, of course, is an intoxicant, a drug in the same sense that marijuana and cocaine are drugs. Its victims are innumerable from the derelict homeless alcoholic to bingeing college kids, to athletes like John Daly, Theo Fleury, Dwight Gooden or Josh Hamilton. Its victims are non-drinkers forced to sit through vomiting and obscenities at public arenas, or worse, to be victimized by soccer riots and drunk drivers. And these days there’s a much greater awareness of the societal costs of alcohol than in the days of Dean Martin, when we treated drunks and drinking as fodder for comedians.
A USA Today survey of the 119 schools in the NCAA’s major football-playing FBS found that nearly half (54) allow the sale of alcohol. Eighty-five of those schools have designated tailgating areas, and barely one in 10 keeps those zones alcohol-free. Researchers for Virginia Tech’s College Alcohol Abuse Prevention Center, armed with handheld breathalyzers, fanned out before four Tech football games and found that 86 percent of 275 tested tailgaters had consumed alcohol. About 46 percent had blood-alcohol levels of 0.08 or higher, the state’s legal standard for intoxication. Among the pregame tailgaters who intended to drive after the game, a third were legally intoxicated. This isn’t just sipping a cold one, by the way. A 2008 Department of Justice study found that about 90 percent of alcohol consumption by those under the age of 21 occurred during binge drinking. About 1,700 college students died in 2011 from excessive drinking.
I am no prohibitionist, by any stretch of the imagination. Have a beer, relax, enjoy the game. But, Super Bowl advertising aside, the sands are shifting, and rightly so. Nineteen major-league teams (including the three most visibly connected to beer, the Cardinals, the Brewers and the Rockies) ban beer from their locker rooms. The NBA’s Lakers, Clippers and Kings, and the NHL’s Ducks, do the same. USC cut off alcohol sales. Miami (Fla.) ended a sponsorship arrangement with Coors. Florida, Ohio State and Kentucky no longer allow alcohol advertising on any TV and radio broadcasts they control. Where colleges don’t act, cops do. In 2012 Indiana’s Excise Police targeted tailgaters at Ball State, Indiana State, Notre Dame, Purdue, Butler and Indiana universities. The goal: to “essentially change behavior,” said police spokesmen. “You were seeing kids that are belligerent drunk, falling down, can’t care for themselves. So it’s not kids having one or two beers.”
Over time even professional teams are trying to figure out what to do. As Bob Whitsitt, former president of the Seattle SuperSonics, put it: “We would be seriously hurt without beer companies as sponsors. It is a sensitive issue because you need the money, but you don’t want to be seen as promoting the idea that people come to our games, get drunk and drive home. We do make sure that our players are out in the community talking about the dangers of alcohol and drugs. That helps.”
Some players are speaking out: The legendary Bubba Smith quit doing beer commercials: “I didn’t like the effect I was having on a lot of little people. People in school. When kids start to listen to what you say, you want to tell ‘em something that’s the truth. ... Doing those commercials, it’s like me telling everyone in school, Hey, it’s cool to have a Lite beer. ... As the years wear on, you got to stop compromising your principles.” (“That Little Voice Just Kept Chanting: “Stop, Bubba, Stop,” L.A. Times, Scott Osler, Sept. 9, 1986). He knew whereof he spoke. Between the ages of two and 18, American children see something like 100,000 television commercials for beer.

The jury found that there was a “culture of intoxication” at Giant's Stadium.
There are growing legal problems for clubs and arenas that sell alcohol. Most states have “dram shop” laws, which hold the seller responsible for the consequences of drinking, particularly drunk driving. Numerous sports related suits have been brought, with big-buck settlements usually done in secret. There’s the occasional public viewing as happened in New Jersey seven years ago when a jury awarded a young girl millions for the permanent injuries she suffered at the hands of a driver who had gotten drunk at a Giants game. The jury found that there was a “culture of intoxication” at Giants Stadium. The verdict was overturned on appeal, but it sent shivers down the spine of the NFL, its clubs and its stadia. There are more in the pipeline, and of all the pressures on sports to do some damn thing about excessive drinking, dram shop laws are likely to be the most effective.
Don’t underestimate the political power of the beer/sports barons to resist reform. Any attempt by government to engage in these discussions will be a ferocious battle. I know, all too well.
My experience with the intersection of beer, sports and politics was, shall we say, instructive. In June of 1985 two things happened. First, I bought two box seat tickets for my pregnant wife and me for a Mets game at Shea (in the days when one could do that for less than $1,000). It was a mob scene. Obscenity, vomiting, threats and violence were rampant, as were the 32 ounce cups of beer being peddled incessantly, and at very, very high cost. The rent-a-cop just shrugged and walked away when a number of us asked for a little help. The drunks were emboldened and threatened us. We left. Second, a few days later, 39 people were killed and over 400 injured in the infamous Belgian Soccer Riot, an alcohol-fueled battle between drunken English and Italian fans, largely instigated and accomplished by the English. An international uproar ensued and alcohol was identified as one, if not the, culprit.
At the time I was a member of the New York State Assembly. It was and is a wonderful place from which to jump into all kinds of social and political battles. So I thought about remedies, Ban the stuff? Prohibition doesn’t work. Limit its sale? Maybe, but that would attract big-money opposition. Well, how about just letting me buy a seat away from the drunks? Simple and elegant, freedom of choice, not a nanny-state interference with the tradition of beer and sports.
Over that summer we drafted a bill. I’m a Democrat and the Senate was run by Republicans, so I went to Republican Sen. John Dunne of Nassau. Sen. Dunne was senior, powerful, smart and effective. He had seen similar stuff to what I had experienced, and we announced the introduction of a bill to require every New York sports facility to sell seats in “alcohol-free” sections.