↵The spread punt formation should die.↵
Death to the Spread Punt
↵
↵
↵I might be biased on this topic because the first time I met the↵spread punt formation was in 2003. Michigan had a good team that year:↵John Navarre was a senior and the Wolverines beat OSU by two touchdowns↵and went on to the Rose Bowl, where they lost because that is what Michigan↵does in the Rose Bowl. The spread punt came into my life during that↵year’s Iowa game, and quickly left. An innovative young grad assistant↵in charge of special teams had noticed some small college or high school↵doing it and thought “self, that looks like progress,”↵installing the newfangled thing for the Iowa game.↵↵The punter rolled out and rugby punted a couple times. Iowa got wise.↵They almost blocked one. They almost blocked another. Then they got one,↵causing veins to throb across Michigan. Undeterred, Michigan soldiered↵on. Iowa blocked a second punt, and veins started bursting, spurting↵blood from every home and place of business occupied by Michigan grads.↵From space, the state looked like a Busby Berkeley film as directed by↵Wes Craven. Michigan lost a game in which they outgained the opponent by 170 yards. The grad↵assistant reportedly had a breakdown and immediately left coaching;↵Michigan shelved the spread punt. Dead it remained. ↵
↵
↵But other schools continued to implement it as the Lloyd Carr era↵wound to a close, and for good reason: it really works. Spreading↵everyone across the field and telling them to run like banshees↵downfield turned two gunners into seven and seriously reduced the number↵and effectiveness of punt returns. I ran the numbers on this on my blog:↵in 2000, before the spread punt hit college, 46 percent of punts were returned↵for an average of 10.1 yards each. Last year, 39 percent of punts we returned↵for 9.1 yards each. If that doesn't seem like a huge reduction, keep in↵mind that there are still a large number of teams that, for whatever↵reason, are sticking with the old-school version of the punt return. The↵real numbers are bigger. For example, Michigan got around to↵re-implementing it last year when Rich Rodriguez hit campus, and these were the stark results: ↵
↵
| 2007 | 2008 | |
|---|---|---|
| Kick Average | 41 | 42 |
| Return Pct. | 41% | 25% |
| Ret Avg | 7.3 | 7.8 |
| Net | 35.9 | 39.3 |
↵↵Same punter, same personnel-for the most part -- but a different↵formation. Punt returns dropped 40 percent; what few punts were returned were↵usually surrounded. I’m not quite sure how the return average went up;↵anecdotally, I assume it was general tackling incompetence. ↵
↵↵That’s all well and good if you’re the only ones doing it, but when↵everyone does it, the punt return goes from a potentially game-changing↵play to an opportunity to make a nicely executed fair catch. Vince McMahon↵will tell you that fair catches are boring, and while he may lack↵awesome football league ideas -- the XFL’s “no fair catch” rule↵came coupled with a ridiculous five-yard halo -- he wasn’t wrong about↵everything. Watching a guy catch a ball lacks a certain something, and↵that something is a bare smidgen of interest. ↵
↵↵The NCAA already put a severe damper on the rugby punt by declaring↵punters live once they exit the tackle box; they should bring back the↵punt return by implementing the NFL rule where only eligible receivers↵can go downfield before the punt. Think of the children, who will be↵deprived of moments like this ... ↵
↵
↵
↵... and grow up like those creepy affectless kids who don’t get enough↵art. Punt returns are art, and they are dying. The children!↵
This post originally appeared on the Sporting Blog. For more, see The Sporting Blog Archives.











