↵
↵
Dez Bryant’s Problems May Not Be Limited To Dez Bryant
↵↵The NCAA’s season-long (and therefore career-long, as Bryant is↵headed for the NFL next year) suspension of Oklahoma State All-American↵wideout Dez Bryant seemed draconian when it was announced a couple days↵ago. Bryant got caught lying to NCAA investigators about some↵hobnobbing with Deion Sanders and possibly nefarious agents. ↵
↵↵This was met with a general hue and cry about 19- and 20-year-olds↵making stupid mistakes and the vague hope that the NCAA would rescind or↵reduce Bryant’s punishment. That may still happen -- Bryant is↵appealing -- but the case is expanding↵past the eligibility of one receiver: ↵
↵↵⇥According to e-mail correspondence, obtained by The↵⇥Oklahoman through a state open records request to OSU, Bryant was↵⇥interviewed by the NCAA on Aug. 28 - eight days before his two↵⇥touchdowns lifted the Cowboys to a 24-10 victory [over Georgia]↵⇥and put him on the cover of Sports Illustrated.↵⇥
↵⇥
↵⇥↵⇥In an Aug. 31 e-mail to OSU associate athletic director for↵⇥compliance Scott Williams, an NCAA official asked: “Why does↵⇥(Bryant’s) story keep changing?”↵⇥
↵⇥
↵⇥On Sept. 2, responding to an inquiry about Bryant’s status,↵⇥an NCAA official reminded Williams “it is the institution’s↵⇥responsibility to certify the eligibility of its student-athletes,”↵⇥adding that OSU “must feel comfortable that Mr. Bryant is eligible↵⇥to compete.”↵⇥
↵↵↵So Oklahoma State knew something was afoot with Bryant and Sanders↵but still fielded the kid for OSU’s opening three games. Doctor↵Saturday suggests that this might cause the NCAA to declare OSU’s↵opening two wins as forfeits, thus opening up a huge can of worms as far↵as polls and whatnot go. If Georgia retroactively “beat”↵Oklahoma State, how does the Coaches’ Poll react? Probably by voting↵Army #1 because they think it’s still 1945. Zing! ↵
↵
↵But seriously, folks: an in-season declaration of forfeiture would↵be, as far as I know, unprecedented. Previous cases for Oklahoma and↵Florida State (and in basketball, Memphis and Michigan and UConn) have↵all come after the shouting's over, leaving the forfeits little more↵than asterisks in a media guide. How would voters in the sport where↵public perception is hugely important react to a Georgia↵"win"? I don't think anyone knows.↵
↵↵For that reason alone, college football should hope the specter of↵forfeiture passes over without taking Oklahoma State’s firstborn. And,↵hell, isn’t it ridiculous that players can’t talk or accept gifts from↵non-affiliated agents? Amateurism is a mostly outdated concept and the↵rules in place serve only to force Deion Sanders and other runners to↵the forefront; allowing players to sign with agents and accept some↵regulated amount of cash in anticipation of a pro career would benefit↵just about everyone. The chances of that, of course, are nil.↵
↵
This post originally appeared on the Sporting Blog. For more, see The Sporting Blog Archives.











