
No More Spending For You, FC Chelsea

Roman Abramovich was already hypocritically agitating to limit spending at major football clubs, conveniently just after Chelsea established itself a regular Champions’ League participant and before Manchester City could wedge its way into the club via their own oil baron.↵↵So you might expect a new proposal (“no spending ever!”) after this bombshell got dropped:↵
↵↵⇥“FC Chelsea is banned from registering any new players, either↵⇥nationally or internationally, for the two next entire and↵⇥consecutive registration periods following the notification of the↵⇥present decision,” said the DRC. “Furthermore, the club, FC Chelsea,↵⇥has to pay to RC Lens training compensation in the amount of €130,000”↵↵↵IE: Chelsea can’t sign anyone until January of 2011 except players they already have under contract. That’s a heavy blow. It comes because Chelsea was ruled to be interfering with RC Lens starlet—woo goofy British footie lingo—Gaël Kakuta, who attempted to break a contract and sign with the Blues. He’s been suspended for four months.↵
↵
↵Chelsea, naturally, ↵is appealing, and they just may win a reduction. Roma got nailed on a similar charge a little while back and saw the penalty reduced to one transfer window, which would have Chelsea back to signing folks next summer. Also, the charge here is basically pursuing a kid they want, something every big club does constantly: ↵
↵↵⇥Real Madrid began the most public of campaigns to make Cristiano↵⇥Ronaldo aware of their interest two or three years ago. The last↵⇥time I checked, Ronaldo had years left on his Old Trafford contract.↵⇥↵⇥Barcelona have been telling anyone that would listen during the↵⇥transfer window that they were willing to go all out to sign Cesc↵⇥Fabregas.↵⇥
↵⇥↵⇥Only this summer Real Madrid’s so-called ‘advisor’, Zinedine Zidane,↵⇥gave an interview to /Le Parisien/ where he insisted that the Bayern↵⇥Munich winger Franck Ribery was on course to become a Bernabeu player.↵⇥
↵↵↵This, in goofy British footie lingo, is “tapping up,” and it’s widespread. Here Chelsea actually induced a player to breach his contract, which makes it significantly different than buying Ronaldo for half the GDP of Spain. Manchester United is unlikely to file a complaint about that. Ferguson isn’t spouting off like so:↵
↵↵⇥“It’s a logical decision. *They stole the boy off us when he was↵⇥16.* He was at our club since the age of eight-and-a-half.↵⇥Unfortunately, 95 times out of 100, it’s the English clubs who come↵⇥and help themselves,” the Lens chairman Gervais Martel told the↵⇥Guardian last night.↵↵↵Chelsea is unlikely to get off scot-free here: bookies have adjusted their projections.↵
↵
This post originally appeared on the Sporting Blog. For more, see The Sporting Blog Archives.
See More:











