Of all the fans of the four major pro sports in America -- MLB, NFL, NBA, and NHL -- baseball fans almost certainly fear change the most. Hockey makes huge changes to the rules of the game to allow for more or less scoring, and the NFL is constantly fiddling with various rules on penalties. But baseball fans contain a subset of ultra-purists, and they’re an especially noisy lobby. Big changes are hard to come by.
What Would The Current Standings Look Like Under Realignment?


Futzing around with realignment is trickier, though. Selig floated a wacky realignment plan over a decade ago, and it didn’t take. Earlier this year, there were whispers of a new plan making the rounds. The main points of the plan:
- 15 teams in each league, requiring at least one interleague series at all times
- No divisions
- One team moving from the NL to the AL
- Five playoff spots in each league, with the fourth and fifth playoff spots going to teams that would meet in a one-game playoff to advance to the NLDS or ALDS
This is just one plan, but it seems to be the only one that’s leaked, so we’ll go with it. The question is, what would the standings look like if this were in place right now? It’s a good time to check because most of the divisional and Wild Card races are essentially over.
National League
| Team | W | L | Games back | |
| 1 | PHI | 83 | 44 | --- |
| 2 | ATL | 78 | 52 | --- |
| 3 | MIL | 78 | 53 | --- |
| 4 | ARI | 70 | 59 | --- |
| 5 | SFG | 68 | 61 | --- |
| 6 | STL | 67 | 62 | 1 |
| 7 | CIN | 63 | 65 | 4.5 |
| 8 | WSN | 62 | 65 | 5 |
| 9 | COL | 62 | 68 | 6.5 |
| 10 | NYM | 60 | 68 | 7.5 |
| 11 | PIT | 60 | 68 | 7.5 |
| 12 | SDP | 60 | 70 | 8.5 |
| 13 | LAD | 59 | 69 | 8.5 |
| 14 | FLA | 57 | 71 | 10.5 |
| 15 | CHC | 56 | 73 | 12 |
American League
| Team | W | L | Games back | |
| 1 | NYY | 77 | 49 | --- |
| 2 | BOS | 78 | 50 | --- |
| 3 | TEX | 74 | 56 | --- |
| 4 | DET | 70 | 58 | --- |
| 5 | LAA | 70 | 59 | (tied for 5th) |
| 6 | TBR | 69 | 58 | (tied for 5th) |
| 7 | TOR | 65 | 63 | 4.5 |
| 8 | CLE | 63 | 63 | 5.5 |
| 9 | CHW | 63 | 64 | 6 |
| 10 | OAK | 58 | 70 | 11.5 |
| 11 | MIN | 55 | 73 | 14.5 |
| 12 | SEA | 55 | 73 | 14.5 |
| 13 | KCR | 53 | 76 | 17 |
| 14 | BAL | 49 | 77 | 19.5 |
| 15 | HOU | 42 | 87 | 28 |
The teams at the top stay the same, of course. The difference is with the teams fighting for the fourth and fifth playoff spots. Instead of the Braves going for the Wild Card, they'd be scrapping with the Brewers for home-field advantage in a first-round series. The Diamondbacks wouldn't be in position to have a first-round series; they'd instead be fighting for a one-game playoff, as would the Giants. The Angels and Rays would have new playoff life, and formerly hopeless teams like the Blue Jays, Nationals, and Reds would at least be in the periphery of the postseason chase.
It would be ... different. There’s something weird about teams under .500 still being close enough to sniff around the chase, but there’s also something appealing about not guaranteeing a spot to a team in a division like the AL Central, which doesn’t necessarily have a team that’s better than the Angels or Rays.
If the plan were to go through, we’d adjust. There would still be exciting races to follow. The idea is so foreign right now, though, that it’s hard to know for sure if this setup or the current setup provides for better baseball in September and October. I’ll take my chances with the current setup, but only because while I’m not a purist, I’m at least a purist sympathizer.











