Skip to main content
Come Fan with UsSaturday, June 20, 2026

Lions commit the biggest pass interference penalty in at least 30 years, and the NFL says it got it wrong

The Lions gave up 66 yards on an incomplete pass against the Packers on Sunday. Referees later admitted they got the call wrong.

NFL: Detroit Lions at Green Bay Packers
NFL: Detroit Lions at Green Bay Packers
Benny Sieu-USA TODAY Sports

The Lions have found more spectacular ways to lose than perhaps any NFL franchise ever, often in ways that stretch the NFL rule book. Last season, they lost to the Seattle Seahawks because what should have been called an illegally batted ball was not called at all and gave up a Hail Mary to Aaron Rodgers and the Packers after committing a phantom facemask penalty.

They lost again to the Packers on Sunday, this time fair and square, but not before once again creating a dubious piece of history. At the beginning of the second quarter, defensive back Nevin Lawson committed a 66-yard pass interference penalty on a deep pass intended for receiver Trevor Davis. According to Elias Sports Bureau, the penalty was the longest in at least 30 years.

And it was a bogus call. On Thursday, Lawson said that the NFL called him to admit that he did not commit a foul on the play.

See for yourself:

According to ESPN, the next longest penalty since it has been tracking the stat was a 60-yard defensive pass interference penalty committed by Brown cornerback Mike Adams against the Ravens in 2010.

Watching the replay, an argument could certainly be made the contact between the two players was incidental. If you really want to get technical, it appears that Davis may have pushed off Lawson before falling down.

Pass interference is a unique penalty in the NFL because it’s a spot foul, meaning the ball is placed where the penalty occurred.

Many have called for the penalty to be adjusted. In 2015, the NFL Competition Committee discussed changing defensive pass interference to 15 yards and a first down, like it is in the college game. There are arguments for and against keeping it as is. On one hand, it makes sense that defenses are punished more for interfering with what would be big gains deep down the field. On the other, situations can occur like the one on Sunday when a somewhat innocuous interference was penalized much more harshly than, say, an unsportsmanlike conduct penalty like targeting.

There are plenty of ideas out there for compromise solutions. For now, defensive pass interference remains as is — often the most costly penalties that teams commit on a weekly basis.

See More:

More in NFL

NFL
WNFC championship game airing Sunday, June 21st from Ford Center in FriscoWNFC championship game airing Sunday, June 21st from Ford Center in Frisco
NFL

The Women’s National Football Conference Championship will air on ESPN2 this weekend.

By RJ Ochoa
From SBNationExternal Link
Which fictional quarterback would you have lead your team?Which fictional quarterback would you have lead your team?
From SBNationExternal Link
By James Dator
NFL
Best bets for 2026 NFL Offensive Rookie of the YearBest bets for 2026 NFL Offensive Rookie of the Year
NFL

There are some good longer-shot options on offensive side of ball for the NFL’s Rookie of the Year.

By Bill Williamson
NFL
Brendan Sorsby is a rare chance to get a top QB cheap, and these teams should go inBrendan Sorsby is a rare chance to get a top QB cheap, and these teams should go in
NFL

This is a no-brainer for some NFL teams.

By James Dator
NFL
Fernando Mendoza has great respect for the Raiders that came before himFernando Mendoza has great respect for the Raiders that came before him
NFL

Fernando Mendoza has great respect for the Raiders that came before him

By RJ Ochoa
NFL
Brendan Sorsby intends to enter NFL Supplemental Draft, per reportsBrendan Sorsby intends to enter NFL Supplemental Draft, per reports
NFL

Texas Tech quarterback Brendan Sorsby is entering the NFL Supplemental Draft, per reports

By Mark Schofield