Skip to main content
Come Fan with UsSaturday, July 11, 2026

Ferrari’s Carlos Sainz Jr. ‘disappointed’ about FIA’s appeal decision

F1 driver Carlos Sainz Jr. expresses his disappointment regarding FIA upholding his penalty from the Australian Grand Prix

F1 Grand Prix of Australia - Qualifying
F1 Grand Prix of Australia - Qualifying
Photo by Qian Jun/MB Media/Getty Images
Mark Schofield
Mark Schofield is a former college quarterback and attorney covering the NFL and F1.

Following an appeal and request for a Right of Review from Ferrari regarding the five-second penalty handed down to Carlos Sainz Jr. at the end of the Australian Grand Prix, FIA announced on Tuesday that they were denying the appeal, and Sainz’s penalty will stand. As previously noted, the penalty dropped Sainz out of the points, leaving Ferrari with nothing to show for their efforts in Melbourne after Charles Leclerc retired on the opening lap.

In a statement released on social media, Sainz noted that while the incident is in the past, he still believes that the penalty is “too disproportionate” and that he remains “disappointed” by the decision:

In their appeal, the team provided telemetry data from Sainz’s car, as well as a statement from the driver and other post-race comments from other drivers regarding the conditions at the end of the race. In their determination, FIA maintained that none of the information would have changed their initial determination that Sainz was “wholly” responsible for a collision with Fernando Alonso following a late-race standing start.

That collision knocked Alonso nito the gravel, and set off a chain of events that also saw Alpine’s Pierre Gasly and Esteban Ocon collide and knock each other out of the race.

Following the decision Tuesday from FIA, Ferrari issued a statement that the team is in contact with FIA, F1, and the other teams regarding how penalties are determined, the ”with the aim of further improving the policing of our sport:”

As noted in Sainz’s statement, he believes this is necessary, declaring that “we need to be clearer for the sake of our sport.”

Many — myself included — believed that Ferrari and Sainz had a decent case at having their appeal fully heard, given how the FIA handled the collision between Ocon and Gasly at the end of the race. Race officials heard from both drivers and determined that the collision was a “first lap” racing incident.

Perhaps that is why my days of practicing law came to a close ...

See More:

More in F1

F1
British Grand Prix: The LEGO F1 drivers’ parade is backBritish Grand Prix: The LEGO F1 drivers’ parade is back
F1

The LEGO drivers’ parade is back for the 2026 F1 British Grand Prix

By Mark Schofield
F1
British Grand Prix: Cadillac F1 unveils ‘America 250’ liveryBritish Grand Prix: Cadillac F1 unveils ‘America 250’ livery
F1

Cadillac F1 will use a red, white, and blue paint scheme at the British Grand Prix

By Mark Schofield
F1
F1 Drivers’ Championship standings 2026F1 Drivers’ Championship standings 2026
F1

Here are the current F1 Drivers’ Championship standings

By Mark Schofield
F1
Austrian Grand Prix qualifying results: Who takes pole at Red Bull Ring?Austrian Grand Prix qualifying results: Who takes pole at Red Bull Ring?
F1

Who will take pole position at the F1 Austrian Grand Prix?

By Mark Schofield
F1
Austrian Grand Prix: Europe’s heat wave a focus for F1 driversAustrian Grand Prix: Europe’s heat wave a focus for F1 drivers
F1

The weather was a focus of conversation Thursday in Austria ahead of the F1 Austrian Grand Prix

By Mark Schofield
F1
Austrian Grand Prix: Cadillac F1 bringing ‘substantial’ upgradeAustrian Grand Prix: Cadillac F1 bringing ‘substantial’ upgrade
F1

F1’s newest team is bringing a ‘substantial’ upgrade package to the Austrian Grand Prix

By Mark Schofield

Comments
Loading comments
Getting the conversation ready...