Skip to main content
Come Fan with UsWednesday, August 5, 2026

2015 Foster Farms Bowl advanced stats tale of the tape: Nebraska vs. UCLA

Foster Farms Bowl
December 26 ( 9:15 PM ET, ESPN ), Levi's Stadium, Santa Clara
Spread: UCLA -7
S&P+ Projection: UCLA 33.5, Nebraska 27.9

Confused? Check out the advanced-stats glossary here.

Statistical profiles index.

Full Football Outsiders F/+ rankings can be found here.

The Basics
Category UCLA Nebraska
S&P+ (Rk) 22 43
Category UCLA offense Nebraska defense Nebraska offense UCLA defense
Yards per play (Rk) 5.77 (37) 5.49 (83) 5.72 (43) 4.71 (23)
Yards per game (Rk) 456.0 (29) 397.6 (66) 434.8 (40) 395.9 (65)
Points per possession (Rk) 2.47 (47) 2.04 (67) 2.36 (55) 1.92 (53)
Category UCLA offense Nebraska defense Nebraska offense UCLA defense
S&P+ (Rk) 37.9 (23) 26.3 (55) 33.7 (36) 25.0 (46)
Rushing S&P+ (Rk) 104.2 (64) 110.2 (36) 108.2 (43) 104.0 (54)
Passing S&P+ (Rk) 106.3 (47) 95.8 (78) 119.2 (25) 118.1 (19)
Standard Downs S&P+ (Rk) 100.0 (73) 100.3 (62) 112.1 (29) 106.5 (43)
Passing Downs S&P+ (Rk) 122.2 (20) 99.5 (72) 117.1 (34) 130.7 (9)
Q1 S&P+ (Rk) 107.0 (52) 103.2 (50) 115.5 (32) 120.8 (20)
Q2 S&P+ (Rk) 112.9 (34) 110.4 (45) 117.2 (30) 114.4 (30)
Q3 S&P+ (Rk) 113.8 (36) 91.3 (98) 119.1 (25) 109.5 (39)
Q4 S&P+ (Rk) 93.2 (100) 94.0 (92) 115.4 (20) 115.1 (24)
Five biggest advantages* (according to the advanced stats)

* or smallest disadvantages

UCLA

  1. Passing Downs Sack Rate (No. 7 offense vs. No. 106 defense)
  2. Standard Downs Sack Rate (No. 2 offense vs. No. 89 defense)
  3. Adj. Sack Rate (No. 3 offense vs. No. 85 defense)
  4. Third Down S&P+ (No. 28 offense vs. No. 90 defense)
  5. Passing Downs Explosiveness (IsoPPP) (No. 24 offense vs. No. 79 defense)

Nebraska

  1. Adj. Line Yards (No. 5 defense vs. No. 74 offense)
  2. Run Stuffs (No. 55 offense vs. No. 123 defense)
  3. Adj. Sack Rate (No. 15 offense vs. No. 81 defense)
  4. Run Stuffs (No. 33 defense vs. No. 90 offense)
  5. Short-Yardage Rushing (No. 2 defense vs. No. 50 offense)
Five Factors
Category UCLA offense Nebraska defense Nebraska offense UCLA defense
EXPLOSIVENESS 1.29 (45) 1.41 (116) 1.32 (34) 1.09 (4)
EFFICIENCY 45.2% (28) 37.8% (32) 41.5% (72) 41.5% (66)
FIELD POSITION 28.0 (110) 30.8 (90) 30.4 (56) 28.0 (30)
FINISHING DRIVES 5.3 (23) 4.6 (55) 4.6 (84) 4.5 (51)
TURNOVER MARGIN EXPECTED:
UCLA 2.48 (48)
Nebraska -0.89 (78)
ACTUAL
UCLA 1 (60)
Nebraska -13 (119)
Offensive Footprint
Category (Rk) UCLA offense Nebraska offense
Adj. Pace 3.5 (30) 0.7 (52)
Plays per game 79.0 (23) 76.0 (48)
Possessions per game 13.2 (60) 13.8 (32)
Std. Downs Run Rate 54.6% (95) 59.2% (69)
Pass. Downs Run Rate 23.3% (118) 26.0% (108)
% of solo tackles 79.9% (26) 69.7% (104)
Defensive Footprint
Category (Rk) UCLA defense Nebraska defense
Std. Downs Run Rate 57.6% (93) 48.5% (127)
Pass. Downs Run Rate 30.7% (95) 30.1% (101)
Overall Havoc Rate 15.6% (73) 15.6% (72)
Front 7 Havoc Rate 10.4% (44) 8.3% (94)
DB Havoc Rate 4.9% (107) 7.2% (32)
PD to INC 41.3% (5) 27.8% (105)

When UCLA has the ball…

Standard Downs
UCLA Offense Nebraska Defense
Avg. Rk Avg. Rk Edge
Standard Downs S&P+ 100.0 73 100.3 62 Nebraska
Standard Downs Success Rate 47.5 58 41.5 21 Nebraska
Standard Downs IsoPPP 1.15 44 0.96 116 UCLA big
SD Line Yards per Carry 2.98 54 2.27 6 Nebraska
SD Sack Rate 0.9% 2 4.4% 89 UCLA big
Passing Downs
UCLA Offense Nebraska Defense
Avg. Rk Avg. Rk Edge
Passing Downs S&P+ 122.2 20 99.5 72 UCLA big
Passing Downs Success Rate 40.2 5 30.9 70 UCLA big
Passing Downs IsoPPP 1.68 88 1.58 65 Nebraska
PD Line Yards per Carry 3.05 83 2.36 7 Nebraska big
PD Sack Rate 3.6% 7 5% 106 UCLA big

When Nebraska has the ball…

Standard Downs
Nebraska Offense UCLA Defense
Avg. Rk Avg. Rk Edge
Standard Downs S&P+ 112.1 29 106.5 43 Nebraska
Standard Downs Success Rate 45.5 85 48.3 83
Standard Downs IsoPPP 1.18 34 1.28 6 UCLA
SD Line Yards per Carry 3.07 38 2.97 81 Nebraska
SD Sack Rate 0.9% 2 5.5% 45 Nebraska
Passing Downs
Nebraska Offense UCLA Defense
Avg. Rk Avg. Rk Edge
Passing Downs S&P+ 117.1 34 130.7 9 UCLA
Passing Downs Success Rate 33.2 42 26.9 30 UCLA
Passing Downs IsoPPP 1.72 79 1.76 22 UCLA big
PD Line Yards per Carry 3.30 58 3.55 99 Nebraska
PD Sack Rate 6% 44 6.1% 86 Nebraska
Individual Passing Stats
Team Player Ht, Wt Year Comp Att Yards TD INT Comp
Rate
Sacks Sack Rate Yards/
Att.
UCLA Josh Rosen 6'4, 210 FR 266 447 3350 20 9 59.5% 14 3.0% 7.0
UCLA Jerry Neuheisel 6'1, 200 JR 5 18 53 0 2 27.8% 0 0.0% 2.9
UCLA Mike Fafaul 6'2, 210 JR 2 2 21 0 0 100.0% 0 0.0% 10.5
Nebraska Tommy Armstrong Jr. 6'1, 220 JR 210 383 2856 21 16 54.8% 11 2.8% 6.9
Nebraska Ryker Fyfe 6'2, 210 JR 34 55 440 5 5 61.8% 2 3.5% 7.4
Nebraska
Individual Rushing Stats
Team Player Pos. Ht, Wt Year Rushes Yards TD Yards/
Carry
Hlt Yds/
Opp.
Opp.
Rate
UCLA Paul Perkins RB 5'11, 210 JR 227 1269 13 5.6 6.0 40.1%
UCLA Soso Jamabo RB 6'3, 210 FR 66 403 4 6.1 6.0 43.9%
UCLA Nate Starks RB 5'11, 210 SO 48 314 5 6.5 6.2 45.8%
UCLA Bolu Olorunfunmi RB 5'10, 220 FR 34 200 0 5.9 5.8 44.1%
Nebraska Terrell Newby RB 5'10, 200 JR 143 743 5 5.2 4.9 39.2%
Nebraska Imani Cross RB 6'1, 240 SR 96 389 5 4.1 3.0 37.5%
Nebraska Tommy Armstrong Jr. QB 6'1, 220 JR 78 446 6 5.7 5.8 39.7%
Nebraska Andy Janovich FB 6'1, 230 SR 36 234 2 6.5 7.2 41.7%
NOTE: Quarterback run totals above do not include sacks (which are counted toward pass averages below) or kneeldowns.
Individual Receiving Stats
Team Player Pos. Ht, Wt Year Targets Catches Yards TD Yds/
Catch
Yds/
Target
Catch Rate
UCLA Jordan Payton WR 6'1, 212 SR 116 75 1069 4 14.3 9.2 64.7%
UCLA Thomas Duarte WR 6'3, 225 JR 83 49 820 10 16.7 9.9 59.0%
UCLA Darren Andrews WR 5'10, 185 SO 55 37 405 1 11.0 7.4 67.3%
UCLA Paul Perkins RB 5'11, 210 JR 38 27 234 1 8.7 6.2 71.1%
UCLA Devin Fuller WR 6'0, 200 SR 32 24 259 3 10.8 8.1 75.0%
UCLA Eldridge Massington WR 6'3, 210 SO 23 10 111 0 11.1 4.8 43.5%
UCLA Kenneth Walker III WR 5'10, 180 JR 17 6 143 0 23.8 8.4 35.3%
Nebraska Jordan Westerkamp WR 6'0, 195 JR 96 64 882 7 13.8 9.2 66.7%
Nebraska Brandon Reilly WR 6'1, 195 JR 64 37 716 4 19.4 11.2 57.8%
Nebraska Cethan Carter TE 6'4, 240 JR 45 22 297 2 13.5 6.6 48.9%
Nebraska Stanley Morgan Jr. WR 6'0, 185 FR 38 23 273 2 11.9 7.2 60.5%
Nebraska Alonzo Moore WR 6'2, 195 JR 37 23 382 6 16.6 10.3 62.2%
Nebraska Terrell Newby RB 5'10, 200 JR 36 23 158 1 6.9 4.4 63.9%
Nebraska Lane Hovey WR 6'4, 205 JR 24 12 158 1 13.2 6.6 50.0%
Individual Defensive Stats
Team Name Pos Ht, Wt Year Tackles % of Team TFL Sacks Int PBU FF FR
UCLA Jayon Brown LB 6'0, 220 JR 71.5 9.9% 2.0 0.5 0 6 0 0
UCLA Kenny Clark DL 6'3, 310 JR 51.5 7.1% 9.0 5.0 0 5 0 0
UCLA Jaleel Wadood DB 5'10, 175 SO 51.5 7.1% 3.0 0.0 2 3 0 0
UCLA Kenny Young LB 6'1, 235 SO 51.0 7.0% 4.5 0.5 1 0 1 0
UCLA Isaako Savaiinaea LB 6'2, 250 JR 48.5 6.7% 2.0 1.5 1 2 0 0
UCLA Randall Goforth DB 5'10, 190 JR 48.0 6.6% 0.0 0.0 2 6 0 0
UCLA Aaron Wallace LB 6'3, 240 SR 42.5 5.9% 12.0 7.0 0 1 0 0
UCLA Marcus Rios DB 6'0, 185 JR 36.5 5.0% 0.5 0.0 0 7 0 0
UCLA Eli Ankou DL 6'3, 305 JR 31.5 4.3% 5.0 1.5 0 3 0 0
UCLA Takkarist McKinley DL 6'2, 250 JR 29.5 4.1% 7.5 4.5 0 4 2 0
UCLA Tahaan Goodman DB 6'2, 195 JR 29.0 4.0% 1.0 0.5 0 2 0 0
UCLA Jacob Tuioti-Mariner DL 6'2, 275 SO 26.0 3.6% 3.5 2.0 0 2 0 0
UCLA Matt Dickerson DL 6'4, 275 SO 25.0 3.5% 4.0 1.0 0 4 0 0
Nebraska Nate Gerry S 6'2, 205 JR 60.5 10.3% 1.5 1.0 4 7 1 0
Nebraska Joshua Kalu CB 6'1, 185 SO 55.5 9.5% 5.0 1.0 2 6 0 0
Nebraska Byerson Cockrell S 6'0, 185 SR 50.0 8.5% 3.0 0.0 0 6 0 0
Nebraska Josh Banderas LB 6'2, 235 JR 45.5 7.8% 6.5 0.0 0 1 0 0
Nebraska Dedrick Young LB 6'1, 220 FR 41.5 7.1% 3.5 0.0 0 3 0 0
Nebraska Jonathan Rose CB 6'1, 195 SR 36.0 6.1% 1.0 0.0 1 7 0 0
Nebraska Chris Weber LB 6'3, 220 SO 33.0 5.6% 3.0 0.0 0 2 0 0
Nebraska Marcus Newby LB 6'1, 235 SO 25.5 4.4% 4.0 1.0 0 4 0 0
Nebraska Maliek Collins DT 6'2, 300 JR 21.5 3.7% 6.0 2.5 0 1 0 0
Nebraska Chris Jones DB 6'0, 180 SO 21.0 3.6% 2.0 1.0 1 4 0 0
Nebraska Greg McMullen DE 6'3, 280 JR 19.0 3.2% 5.5 4.0 0 0 1 0
Nebraska Ross Dzuris DE 6'3, 250 JR 18.0 3.1% 5.5 2.5 0 0 0 0
Nebraska Aaron Williams S 5'11, 185 FR 17.5 3.0% 2.0 0.0 0 0 0 0
Note: It appears "Fumble Returns" are getting pulled instead of "Fumble Recoveries." My apologies. Will try to get that corrected.
Individual Special Teams Stats
Team Punter Ht, Wt Year Punts Avg TB FC I20 FC/I20
Ratio
UCLA Matt Mengel 6'2, 210 SR 50 39.9 2 20 14 68.0%
UCLA Adam Searl 6'0, 185 SO 5 39.0 0 3 1 80.0%
Nebraska Sam Foltz 6'1, 200 JR 53 44.4 5 8 14 41.5%
Nebraska Tyson Broekemeier 6'1, 200 SR 5 37.0 1 2 2 80.0%
Team Kicker Ht, Wt Year Kickoffs Avg TB TB% OOB Fair
Catches
Onside
Att
Onside
Success
UCLA Ka'imi Fairbairn 6'0, 190 SR 79 64.6 56 70.9% 0 0 0 0
Nebraska Drew Brown 5'11, 180 SO 72 60.7 31 43.1% 0 0 4 1
Nebraska Spencer Lindsay 5'9, 205 JR 1 65.0 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0
Team Place-Kicker Ht, Wt Year PAT FG Pct
UCLA Ka'imi Fairbairn 6'0, 190 SR 44-44 20-23 87.0%
Nebraska Drew Brown 5'11, 180 SO 40-41 20-26 76.9%
Team Kick Returner Ht, Wt Year Returns Avg. TD Fair Catch Fumbles (Lost)
UCLA Devin Fuller 6'0, 200 SR 17 24.2 0 0 0 (0)
UCLA Roosevelt Davis 5'7, 165 SR 8 24.3 0 0 0 (0)
Nebraska Stanley Morgan Jr. 6'0, 185 FR 12 24.7 0 0 0 (0)
Nebraska Jordan Stevenson 5'9, 205 FR 6 14.2 0 0 0 (0)
Team Punt Returner Ht, Wt Year Returns Avg. TD Fair Catch Fumbles (Lost)
UCLA Devin Fuller 6'0, 200 SR 12 11.8 0 12 0 (0)
UCLA Ishmael Adams 5'8, 180 JR 4 5.3 0 6 2 (1)
Nebraska Jordan Westerkamp 6'0, 195 JR 5 10.6 0 20 0 (0)
Nebraska De'Mornay Pierson-El 5'9, 185 SO 4 12.0 0 1 1 (1)

Stats via SportSource Analytics

College Football
College football’s 20 best transfers of the 2026 seasonCollege football’s 20 best transfers of the 2026 season
College Football

20 transfers that will define the 2020 college football season.

By Mark Schofield
College Football
North Dakota State’s college football dynasty finally reaches the big leaguesNorth Dakota State’s college football dynasty finally reaches the big leagues
College Football

North Dakota State dominated FCS college football. Can it work in the Mountain West?

By Mark Schofield
College Football
Heisman Trophy rankings: Predicting college football’s top contenders for 2026Heisman Trophy rankings: Predicting college football’s top contenders for 2026
College Football

College football’s long list of Heisman Trophy candidates entering 2026 season

By Mark Schofield
College Football
College Football Reacts: Are patch deals ok for the game?College Football Reacts: Are patch deals ok for the game?
College Football

Let us know how you feel about the takeover of patch deals in college football

By Kyle Thele
College Football
College football rankings: Preseason top-25 teams, according to usCollege football rankings: Preseason top-25 teams, according to us
College Football

Here’s our top-25 teams in college football.

By Mark Schofield
NFL Draft beat
How NFL-ready is Arch Manning?How NFL-ready is Arch Manning?
NFL Draft beat

Arch Manning is the presumptive QB1 in the 2027 draft class that’s supposed to be generational. What does he need to improve in order to make that a reality?

By Doug Farrar