Skip to main content
Come Fan with UsSunday, August 9, 2026

2015 Orange Bowl advanced stats tale of the tape: Clemson vs. Oklahoma

Joshua S. Kelly-USA TODAY Sports
Capital One Orange Bowl -- CFP SEMIFINAL
December 31 ( 4:00 PM ET, ESPN ), Sun Life Stadium, Miami
Spread: Oklahoma -4
S&P+ Projection: Clemson 30.5, Oklahoma 28.7

Confused? Check out the advanced-stats glossary here.

Statistical profiles index.

Full Football Outsiders F/+ rankings can be found here.

The Basics
Category Oklahoma Clemson
S&P+ (Rk) 3 2
Category Oklahoma offense Clemson defense Clemson offense Oklahoma defense
Yards per play (Rk) 6.65 (10) 4.48 (10) 6.27 (18) 4.56 (15)
Yards per game (Rk) 543.7 (6) 293.2 (4) 517.7 (10) 354.5 (34)
Points per possession (Rk) 3.19 (8) 1.42 (15) 2.72 (27) 1.38 (13)
Category Oklahoma offense Clemson defense Clemson offense Oklahoma defense
S&P+ (Rk) 43.4 (3) 15.0 (6) 41.3 (10) 18.7 (12)
Rushing S&P+ (Rk) 115.3 (18) 119.6 (13) 112.0 (28) 124.7 (6)
Passing S&P+ (Rk) 127.2 (10) 141.2 (3) 143.4 (3) 131.8 (6)
Standard Downs S&P+ (Rk) 127.5 (3) 145.8 (2) 124.7 (6) 127.4 (3)
Passing Downs S&P+ (Rk) 102.4 (61) 104.6 (59) 127.5 (13) 126.9 (12)
Q1 S&P+ (Rk) 111.0 (44) 159.2 (1) 127.4 (9) 137.7 (5)
Q2 S&P+ (Rk) 133.1 (5) 156.2 (2) 131.3 (6) 128.1 (11)
Q3 S&P+ (Rk) 132.7 (4) 135.1 (9) 127.9 (10) 123.6 (16)
Q4 S&P+ (Rk) 111.1 (34) 99.6 (68) 113.8 (27) 113.5 (27)
Five biggest advantages* (according to the advanced stats)

* or smallest disadvantages

Oklahoma

  1. Field Position (No. 23 offense vs. No. 96 defense)
  2. Field Position (No. 32 defense vs. No. 103 offense)
  3. Rushing Efficiency (Success Rate) (No. 5 defense vs. No. 35 offense)
  4. Rushing S&P+ (No. 6 defense vs. No. 28 offense)
  5. Q4 S&P+ (No. 20 vs. No. 42 )

Clemson

  1. Standard Downs Sack Rate (No. 1 defense vs. No. 120 offense)
  2. Short-Yardage Rushing (No. 6 offense vs. No. 114 defense)
  3. Adj. Sack Rate (No. 14 defense vs. No. 105 offense)
  4. Passing Downs Sack Rate (No. 28 defense vs. No. 86 offense)
  5. Run Stuffs (No. 2 defense vs. No. 49 offense)
Five Factors
Category Oklahoma offense Clemson defense Clemson offense Oklahoma defense
EXPLOSIVENESS 1.41 (7) 1.40 (114) 1.29 (46) 1.20 (32)
EFFICIENCY 46.8% (17) 31.2% (3) 48.6% (13) 35.7% (19)
FIELD POSITION 32.2 (23) 31.1 (96) 28.4 (103) 28.0 (32)
FINISHING DRIVES 5.2 (27) 4.0 (27) 5.3 (25) 4.2 (31)
TURNOVER MARGIN EXPECTED:
Oklahoma 2.73 (43)
Clemson 2.28 (50)
ACTUAL
Oklahoma 10 (14)
Clemson -2 (80)
Offensive Footprint
Category (Rk) Oklahoma offense Clemson offense
Adj. Pace 6.6 (16) 8.1 (12)
Plays per game 81.8 (15) 82.5 (13)
Possessions per game 14.3 (12) 14.2 (16)
Std. Downs Run Rate 56.4% (84) 57.9% (75)
Pass. Downs Run Rate 35.8% (48) 35.9% (45)
% of solo tackles 75.4% (60) 77.1% (44)
Defensive Footprint
Category (Rk) Oklahoma defense Clemson defense
Std. Downs Run Rate 59.3% (71) 58.3% (82)
Pass. Downs Run Rate 40.7% (14) 34.4% (60)
Overall Havoc Rate 16.7% (49) 21.3% (5)
Front 7 Havoc Rate 10.9% (30) 14.0% (6)
DB Havoc Rate 5.8% (79) 6.9% (41)
PD to INC 29.7% (90) 27.6% (106)

When Oklahoma has the ball…

Standard Downs
Oklahoma Offense Clemson Defense
Avg. Rk Avg. Rk Edge
Standard Downs S&P+ 127.5 3 145.8 2
Standard Downs Success Rate 52.1 18 33.8 2 Clemson
Standard Downs IsoPPP 1.39 2 1.03 57 Oklahoma big
SD Line Yards per Carry 3.39 8 2.16 4
SD Sack Rate 9.4% 120 11.5% 1 Clemson big
Passing Downs
Oklahoma Offense Clemson Defense
Avg. Rk Avg. Rk Edge
Passing Downs S&P+ 102.4 61 104.6 59
Passing Downs Success Rate 33.9 37 27.5 34
Passing Downs IsoPPP 1.51 123 1.66 116
PD Line Yards per Carry 2.92 96 2.86 38 Clemson big
PD Sack Rate 8.6% 86 9.3% 28 Clemson big

When Clemson has the ball…

Standard Downs
Clemson Offense Oklahoma Defense
Avg. Rk Avg. Rk Edge
Standard Downs S&P+ 124.7 6 127.4 3
Standard Downs Success Rate 52.7 16 40.5 15
Standard Downs IsoPPP 1.23 16 1.08 35 Clemson
SD Line Yards per Carry 3.25 19 2.55 23
SD Sack Rate 1.6% 7 6.1% 31 Clemson
Passing Downs
Clemson Offense Oklahoma Defense
Avg. Rk Avg. Rk Edge
Passing Downs S&P+ 127.5 13 126.9 12
Passing Downs Success Rate 36.4 21 27.0 31
Passing Downs IsoPPP 1.56 111 1.96 38 Oklahoma big
PD Line Yards per Carry 3.52 35 3.43 87 Clemson big
PD Sack Rate 3.8% 8 8.4% 41 Clemson
Individual Passing Stats
Team Player Ht, Wt Year Comp Att Yards TD INT Comp
Rate
Sacks Sack Rate Yards/
Att.
Oklahoma Baker Mayfield 6'1, 209 JR 243 354 3389 35 5 68.6% 34 8.8% 8.3
Oklahoma Trevor Knight 6'1, 207 JR 22 40 305 2 2 55.0% 2 4.8% 7.0
Oklahoma Cody Thomas 6'4, 211 SO 1 1 1 0 0 100.0% 0 0.0% 1.0
Clemson Deshaun Watson 6'2, 210 SO 287 413 3512 30 11 69.5% 12 2.8% 8.1
Clemson Nick Schuessler 6'3, 200 JR 13 23 177 0 1 56.5% 2 8.0% 6.1
Clemson Kelly Bryant 6'3, 215 FR 7 9 27 0 1 77.8% 0 0.0% 3.0
Individual Rushing Stats
Team Player Pos. Ht, Wt Year Rushes Yards TD Yards/
Carry
Hlt Yds/
Opp.
Opp.
Rate
Oklahoma Samaje Perine RB 5'10, 230 SO 211 1291 15 6.1 6.5 40.8%
Oklahoma Joe Mixon RB 6'1, 217 FR 110 749 7 6.8 7.0 46.4%
Oklahoma Baker Mayfield QB 6'1, 209 JR 97 582 7 6.0 5.8 44.3%
Oklahoma Alex Ross RB 6'1, 221 JR 30 173 1 5.8 5.7 40.0%
Clemson Wayne Gallman RB 6'1, 215 SO 243 1332 10 5.5 4.9 40.3%
Clemson Deshaun Watson QB 6'2, 210 SO 151 954 11 6.3 5.4 46.4%
Clemson C.J. Fuller RB 5'10, 210 FR 42 171 1 4.1 2.0 35.7%
Clemson Zac Brooks RB 6'1, 200 SR 37 211 3 5.7 7.0 35.1%
NOTE: Quarterback run totals above do not include sacks (which are counted toward pass averages below) or kneeldowns.
Individual Receiving Stats
Team Player Pos. Ht, Wt Year Targets Catches Yards TD Yds/
Catch
Yds/
Target
Catch Rate
Oklahoma Sterling Shepard WR 5'10, 193 SR 104 79 1201 11 15.2 11.6 76.0%
Oklahoma Dede Westbrook WR 6'0, 168 JR 65 42 674 4 16.1 10.4 64.6%
Oklahoma Durron Neal WR 5'11, 199 SR 58 42 527 3 12.6 9.1 72.4%
Oklahoma Joe Mixon RB 6'1, 217 FR 30 25 345 4 13.8 11.5 83.3%
Oklahoma Jarvis Baxter WR 5'11, 160 JR 27 17 182 1 10.7 6.7 63.0%
Oklahoma Mark Andrews TE 6'5, 245 FR 25 17 286 6 16.8 11.4 68.0%
Oklahoma Samaje Perine RB 5'10, 230 SO 16 13 84 1 6.5 5.3 81.2%
Clemson Artavis Scott WR 5'11, 190 SO 105 84 831 5 9.9 7.9 80.0%
Clemson Charone Peake WR 6'3, 215 SR 64 40 563 5 14.1 8.8 62.5%
Clemson Jordan Leggett TE 6'5, 255 JR 48 34 442 7 13.0 9.2 70.8%
Clemson Deon Cain WR 6'2, 200 FR 46 34 582 5 17.1 12.7 73.9%
Clemson Hunter Renfrow WR 5'10, 175 FR 33 22 345 2 15.7 10.5 66.7%
Clemson Ray-Ray McCloud WR 5'10, 180 FR 32 26 238 1 9.2 7.4 81.2%
Clemson Germone Hopper WR 6'0, 180 JR 29 21 317 1 15.1 10.9 72.4%
Individual Defensive Stats
Team Name Pos Ht, Wt Year Tackles % of Team TFL Sacks Int PBU FF FR
Oklahoma Dominique Alexander LB 6'0, 220 JR 70.5 10.2% 7.0 0.5 1 2 0 0
Oklahoma Jordan Evans LB 6'2, 239 JR 62.5 9.0% 5.0 1.0 0 4 1 1
Oklahoma Ahmad Thomas S 6'0, 213 JR 56.0 8.1% 1.5 1.5 3 2 0 0
Oklahoma Eric Striker LB 6'0, 222 SR 48.5 7.0% 16.0 7.5 1 3 1 0
Oklahoma Steven Parker S 6'1, 200 SO 46.0 6.6% 4.0 1.5 0 4 0 0
Oklahoma Zack Sanchez CB 5'11, 179 JR 39.5 5.7% 3.5 0.5 6 7 0 0
Oklahoma Jordan Thomas CB 6'0, 191 SO 38.0 5.5% 0.0 0.0 5 4 0 0
Oklahoma Charles Tapper DE 6'2, 282 SR 36.0 5.2% 10.0 7.0 0 2 4 1
Oklahoma Charles Walker DT 6'2, 297 SO 30.5 4.4% 10.0 6.0 0 1 1 0
Oklahoma Devante Bond LB 6'1, 238 SR 30.5 4.4% 6.0 2.0 0 1 1 0
Oklahoma Frank Shannon LB 6'0, 239 SR 29.5 4.3% 0.0 0.0 1 0 0 0
Oklahoma Matt Dimon DT 6'2, 260 JR 24.0 3.5% 7.0 2.5 0 0 1 0
Oklahoma Dakota Austin CB 5'10, 157 JR 24.0 3.5% 1.0 0.0 2 3 0 0
Clemson B.J. Goodson LB 6'1, 250 SR 68.5 10.7% 14.0 5.5 1 3 1 1
Clemson T.J. Green S 6'3, 205 JR 64.0 10.0% 5.5 1.0 0 3 2 0
Clemson Ben Boulware LB 5'11, 240 JR 55.0 8.6% 7.0 2.5 1 6 3 0
Clemson Shaq Lawson DE 6'3, 270 JR 43.5 6.8% 22.5 9.5 0 0 1 0
Clemson Kevin Dodd DE 6'5, 275 JR 42.5 6.6% 15.0 8.0 0 0 1 0
Clemson Jayron Kearse S 6'5, 220 JR 42.5 6.6% 6.5 0.0 1 6 1 1
Clemson Cordrea Tankersley CB 6'1, 195 JR 35.5 5.5% 2.5 1.0 5 7 0 0
Clemson Dorian O'Daniel LB 6'1, 215 SO 26.0 4.0% 5.5 0.0 0 1 0 0
Clemson Travis Blanks LB 6'1, 210 JR 26.0 4.0% 4.0 1.0 0 2 0 0
Clemson Christian Wilkins DT 6'4, 315 FR 21.5 3.3% 4.5 2.0 0 0 1 0
Clemson Carlos Watkins DT 6'3, 300 JR 21.0 3.3% 5.5 2.5 1 2 0 0
Clemson Mackensie Alexander CB 5'11, 195 SO 18.5 2.9% 2.0 0.0 0 4 0 0
Clemson Van Smith S 6'0, 190 FR 15.5 2.4% 1.0 0.0 1 0 0 0
Note: It appears "Fumble Returns" are getting pulled instead of "Fumble Recoveries." My apologies. Will try to get that corrected.
Individual Special Teams Stats
Team Punter Ht, Wt Year Punts Avg TB FC I20 FC/I20
Ratio
Oklahoma Austin Seibert 5'10, 210 FR 51 42.4 2 27 18 88.2%
Clemson Andy Teasdall 5'11, 190 JR 54 39.4 0 21 16 68.5%
Clemson Deshaun Watson 6'2, 210 SO 1 23.0 0 0 1 100.0%
Team Kicker Ht, Wt Year Kickoffs Avg TB TB% OOB Fair
Catches
Onside
Att
Onside
Success
Oklahoma Nick Hodgson 6'2, 202 SR 98 63.4 50 51.0% 0 0 0 0
Clemson Ammon Lakip 5'10, 200 SR 73 59.2 28 38.4% 1 0 0 0
Clemson Greg Huegel 5'11, 185 FR 22 62.0 4 18.2% 0 1 0 0
Team Place-Kicker Ht, Wt Year PAT FG Pct
Oklahoma Austin Seibert 5'10, 210 FR 68-70 17-22 77.3%
Oklahoma Nick Hodgson 6'2, 202 SR 1-1 1-1 100.0%
Clemson Greg Huegel 5'11, 185 FR 49-54 22-25 88.0%
Clemson Ammon Lakip 5'10, 200 SR 7-7 1-1 100.0%
Team Kick Returner Ht, Wt Year Returns Avg. TD Fair Catch Fumbles (Lost)
Oklahoma Alex Ross 6'1, 221 JR 26 21.1 0 0 1 (1)
Oklahoma Durron Neal 5'11, 199 SR 2 26.5 0 0 0 (0)
Clemson C.J. Fuller 5'10, 210 FR 14 16.9 0 0 1 (0)
Clemson Artavis Scott 5'11, 190 SO 11 25.2 0 0 0 (0)
Team Punt Returner Ht, Wt Year Returns Avg. TD Fair Catch Fumbles (Lost)
Oklahoma Sterling Shepard 5'10, 193 SR 19 7.8 0 32 2 (2)
Oklahoma Jarvis Baxter 5'11, 160 JR 1 10.0 0 0 0 (0)
Clemson Artavis Scott 5'11, 190 SO 10 2.8 0 17 1 (0)
Clemson Germone Hopper 6'0, 180 JR 5 -1.4 0 7 1 (1)

Stats via SportSource Analytics

College Football
College football’s 26 Most Important People in 2026College football’s 26 Most Important People in 2026
College Football

These are the names that will define the college football season.

By Mark Schofield
College Football
Purdue’s new AD tried to roast Indiana football, but ended up making a fool of himselfPurdue’s new AD tried to roast Indiana football, but ended up making a fool of himself
College Football
Texas Tech’s next move at QB could define its season after Brendan Sorsby fiascoTexas Tech’s next move at QB could define its season after Brendan Sorsby fiasco
College Football
6 college football teams that could surprise everyone in 20266 college football teams that could surprise everyone in 2026
College Football

These teams are taking a leap this season.

By Mark Schofield
College Football
What can Indiana and Curt Cignetti do for an encore?What can Indiana and Curt Cignetti do for an encore?
College Football

Indiana football expects to be the same machine even with a new QB

By Mark Schofield
College Football
College football’s 20 best transfers of the 2026 seasonCollege football’s 20 best transfers of the 2026 season
College Football

20 transfers that will define the 2020 college football season.

By Mark Schofield