Skip to main content
Come Fan with UsSunday, June 28, 2026

If luck finally goes Utah State’s way, that could mean a Mountain West title

The 128-team countdown previews a team that’s gone from totally irrelevant to one of the country’s most consistent.

USA TODAY Sports

Confused? Check out the advanced-stats glossary here.

1. They survived (again)

Midway through 2013, Utah State was led by a first-year head coach and a freshman quarterback. And the Aggies finished the regular season with five consecutive wins, beat out Boise State for the MWC Mountain Division title, narrowly lost at Fresno State in the conference title, beat Jordan Lynch and Northern Illinois in a bowl, and finished 32nd in the F/+ rankings.

Utah State survived when it had every excuse not to. I'm not sure you can say anything more flattering. But now more tests come in 2014.

-- The big 2014 Utah State football preview

College football can be a glacier. A majority of the teams that were good 30 or 60 years ago are still good today; the oligarchy’s membership does not turn over often.

Sometimes, though, reality can change. Four seasons ago, in my first year of doing this preview series, I wrote about Utah State as the “Duke of the WAC,” a program that could find encouragement from nearly cracking double-digits in the F/+ rankings. That Gary Andersen had been able to engineer back-to-back four-win seasons was an accomplishment; the Aggies hadn’t finished with a winning record since 1996.

Four springs later, I write about Utah State as one of the sturdiest programs in the mid-major universe. It has survived a coaching change and countless quarterback injuries to craft one of the nation’s steadiest defenses and attend four consecutive bowl games. The Aggies could have fallen off after Andersen went 11-2 in 2012 and departed. They could have folded up shop when they lost star quarterback Chuckie Keeton to injury the next year. They could have lost the plot after Keeton got hurt again, along with virtually every other quarterback on the roster.

Instead, the Aggies cruise along, winners of 30 games in three seasons, one of the only mid-major programs to rank in the F/+ top 60 for four straight years.

USU has proved two conflicting messages. In 2011-12, the Aggies proved what a breakthrough talent at quarterback could do; Chuckie Keeton’s play-making ability (137.4 passer rating as a freshman in 2011, 154.7 with 3,373 passing yards and 619 rushing yards in 2012) gave them the offensive boost they needed to win. But in 2013-14, USU proved that you can win big despite the quarterback position if your support and culture are strong. Three different Aggies threw at least 70 passes in 2013, and four threw at least 35 in 2014, and the train kept rolling.

Now, we get Chuckie back one last time. Keeton was granted an extra year of eligibility after his back-to-back injuries, and that’s an awesome thing for college football. But with or without Keeton, one should assume quality.

Four years after finding hope in a 4-8 record, Utah State gets total benefit of the doubt until proved otherwise.

2014 Schedule & Results

Record: 10-4 | Adj. Record: 9-5 | Final F/+ Rk: 52
Date Opponent Opp. F/+ Rk Score W-L Percentile
Performance
Adj. Scoring
Margin
Win
Expectancy
31-Aug at Tennessee 24 7-38 L 4% -40.4 0%
6-Sep Idaho State N/A 40-20 W 46% -2.5 99%
13-Sep Wake Forest 101 36-24 W 50% -0.3 93%
20-Sep at Arkansas State 66 14-21 L 56% 3.4 65%
3-Oct at BYU 46 35-20 W 79% 18.8 93%
11-Oct Air Force 48 34-16 W 94% 36.7 100%
18-Oct at Colorado State 49 13-16 L 71% 12.7 80%
25-Oct UNLV 118 34-20 W 53% 2.0 93%
1-Nov at Hawaii 111 35-14 W 77% 16.9 100%
7-Nov at Wyoming 113 20-3 W 50% -0.2 92%
15-Nov New Mexico 94 28-21 W 56% 3.5 89%
21-Nov San Jose State 116 41-7 W 90% 30.2 100%
29-Nov at Boise State 21 19-50 L 5% -37.3 0%
20-Dec vs. UTEP 90 21-6 W 82% 21.4 99%

Category Offense Rk Defense Rk
S&P+ 26.8 77 23.1 32
Points Per Game 26.9 81 19.7 12

2. Two high-profile duds

As stable as Utah State has been, the Aggies have suffered a dropoff in each of the last two years. This was to be expected: in 2013, they suffered coaching turnover and lost Keeton. In 2014, they suffered defensive turnover and lost Keeton. The Aggies had to replace their top tacklers at defensive end, nose guard, and inside linebacker and seven of their top 10 defensive backs. That they fell from fifth in the Def. S&P+ ratings was no shock, but the fact that they only fell to 32nd was encouraging.

That the offense held steady was nice to see. And a drop from 31st in the overall F/+ rankings in 2013 to 52nd in 2014 was a justifiable result.

As the chart above shows, USU was nearly a top-40 team in 12 of 14 games last year but played horrendous football against its two best opponents.

  • Average Percentile Performance (vs. F/+ top 25): 5% (average score: Opp 44, USU 13)
  • Average Percentile Performance (vs. everybody else): 67% (average score: USU 29, Opp 16)

Utah State’s offense averaged 4.4 yards per play against Tennessee and Boise State and 6.1 against everybody else. The defense played well against the Vols (4.9 per play) and poorly against the Broncos (6.1). Was the offense too outmanned against athletic defenses? Was it a performance anxiety issue? You can conclude anything you want from a two-game sample, but there’s no question that these two games dragged USU’s ratings down. With the brightest lights on, they got dominated twice.

Otherwise, they went an unlucky 10-2, losing two games (to Arkansas State and Colorado State, both bowl teams) by a combined 10 points despite winning the statistical battles in both games.

Offense

FIVE FACTORS -- OFFENSE
Raw Category Rk Opp. Adj. Category Rk
EXPLOSIVENESS IsoPPP 1.01 6 IsoPPP+ 101.0 66
EFFICIENCY Succ. Rt. 39.3% 93 Succ. Rt. + 92.4 99
FIELD POSITION Def. Avg. FP 28.9 49 Def. FP+ 100.0 65
FINISHING DRIVES Pts. Per Trip in 40 3.9 102 Redzone S&P+ 88.3 104
TURNOVERS EXPECTED 23.5 ACTUAL 21 -2.5
Category Yards/
Game Rk
S&P+ Rk Success
Rt. Rk
PPP+ Rk
OVERALL 85 79 90 66
RUSHING 51 63 58 63
PASSING 94 79 110 63
Standard Downs 79 83 70
Passing Downs 67 97 55
Q1 Rk 42 1st Down Rk 61
Q2 Rk 82 2nd Down Rk 73
Q3 Rk 93 3rd Down Rk 65
Q4 Rk 124

3. A Josh Heupel offense

This year, the biggest changes will come in the coaching booth. Matt Wells lost defensive coordinator Todd Orlando to the same position at Houston, and offensive coordinator Kevin McGiven left to become Gary Andersen’s quarterbacks coach at Oregon State.

The names of both replacements are familiar. New defensive coordinator Kevin Clune was USU’s linebackers coach under Andersen and Wells from 2009-13 until the Hawaii defensive coordinator position came open in 2014. His aggressive scheme didn’t find traction on the islands.

Wells brought on former Oklahoma offensive coordinator Josh Heupel to call the shots for Keeton and company. From a “relationships grow stale” standpoint, it was the right time for a change in Norman; Bob Stoops needed new blood following the Sooners’ unlucky slide to 8-5. But on paper, Heupel’s performance as coordinator was solid. He inherited an offense that had ranked ninth in Off. S&P+ in 2010 and he went ninth, fifth, 44th, and 14th. The Sooners got by with smoke and mirrors during their 2013 Sugar Bowl run, but they rebounded last year despite an iffy passing game.

Heupel isn’t bringing much change to the table; or at least, he isn’t bringing the type you might expect.

  • Standard Downs %Run (2014): OU 68.1%, USU 60.9%
  • Passing Downs %Run (2014): OU 37.6%, USU 36.3%
  • Adj. Pace (2014): OU 23.9 seconds per play, USU 25.9

Last year’s OU offense had a higher pace but ran more than two-thirds of the time on standard downs thanks to the presence of powerful freshman Samaje Perine. There’s no Perine on this roster, but there are options, especially if Keeton’s mobility hasn’t been hurt much by knee injuries. JaLuan Hunt was inefficient, as freshmen tend to be, but he showed lovely explosiveness. Rashad Hall is a big option at 215 pounds, and incoming JUCO transfer Devante Mays is a 5’11, 225-pound bowling ball.

Quarterback

Note: players in bold below are 2015 returnees. Players in italics are questionable with injury/suspension.

Player Ht, Wt 2015
Year
Rivals 247 Comp. Comp Att Yards TD INT Comp
Rate
Sacks Sack Rate Yards/
Att.
Darell Garretson
91 135 1140 8 3 67.4% 9 6.3% 7.6
Kent Myers 6'0, 195 So. 2 stars (5.4) 0.8181 79 119 866 5 3 66.4% 14 10.5% 5.8
Chuckie Keeton 6'2, 210 Sr. 2 stars (5.3) 0.7000 51 92 426 2 4 55.4% 3 3.2% 4.3
Craig Harrison
18 35 249 3 0 51.4% 2 5.4% 6.3
DJ Nelson 5'9, 200 RSFr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.7833
Cade Smith 6'2, 205 Fr. 3 stars (5.5) 0.8067

4. Hey, Chuckie :)

It’s sad to realize how efficient Keeton was in 2013, before his first of two knee injuries. Through the first five games, which included three wins and narrow road losses to two Pac-12 opponents (Utah, USC), Keeton had completed 71 percent of his passes for 17 touchdowns and one interception. He was also averaging more than six yards per non-sack carry. Though big plays were hard to come by, his efficiency and decision making were second to none.

The next glimpse was in 2014, rusty and frustrated against Tennessee. The knee injury had knocked him out of spring ball, and he was still getting back up to speed in the third game -- he was 20-for-27 against Wake Forest -- when he went down again.

When 100 percent, Keeton is one of the most efficient quarterbacks in college football. But it’s clear he’s got depth behind him. Despite Darell Garretson’s transfer, Keeton’s 2014 injury gave then-freshman Kent Myers a chance. Myers completed a Chuckie-esque two-thirds of his passes after Garretson and Harrison went down; he was 27-for-31 passing against Hawaii and Wyoming before trailing off, and his mobility led him to the receiver position this spring until Garretson transferred.

Between Myers, mobile redshirt freshman DJ Nelson, and incoming freshman Cade Smith, there are again options behind Keeton. But hopefully we don’t see any of them in 2015.

Running Back

Player Pos. Ht, Wt 2015
Year
Rivals 247 Comp. Rushes Yards TD Yards/
Carry
Hlt Yds/
Opp.
Opp.
Rate
Fumbles Fum.
Lost
Joe Hill RB
118 507 4 4.3 5.5 34.7% 1 1
LaJuan Hunt RB 5'8, 195 So. 2 stars (5.4) 0.7906 110 545 1 5.0 5.9 32.7% 0 0
JoJo Natson WR 5'7, 160 Sr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.8000 50 498 3 10.0 13.7 48.0% 4 1
Rashad Hall RB 6'1, 215 Sr. 2 stars (5.2) 0.7000 49 203 2 4.1 3.0 32.7% 0 0
Kent Myers QB 6'0, 195 So. 2 stars (5.4) 0.8181 43 395 5 9.2 7.8 62.8% 6 2
Nick Vigil RB/LB 6'2, 230 Jr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.8063 41 152 3 3.7 4.1 29.3% 0 0
Chuckie Keeton QB 6'2, 210 Sr. 2 stars (5.3) 0.7000 17 95 1 5.6 6.5 41.2% 1 0
Kennedy Williams RB 5'8, 160 Jr. NR NR 8 81 0 10.1 6.4 75.0% 2 2
Craig Harrison QB
8 69 0 8.6 6.9 75.0% 2 1
Darell Garretson QB
8 43 2 5.4 4.2 62.5% 1 1
Ronald Butler WR
6 72 0 12.0 14.7 66.7% 0 0
Hunter Sharp WR 6'0, 200 Sr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.7000 6 28 0 4.7 3.5 33.3% 0 0
Justen Hervey RB 5'9, 190 RSFr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.8006
Devante Mays RB 5'11, 225 Jr. NR 0.7883

Receiving Corps

Player Pos. Ht, Wt 2015
Year
Rivals 247 Comp. Targets Catches Yards Catch Rate Target
Rate
%SD Yds/
Target
NEY Real Yds/
Target
RYPR
Hunter Sharp WR-X 6'0, 200 Sr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.7000 102 66 939 64.7% 27.6% 58.8% 9.2 142 9.1 111.8
JoJo Natson WR-T 5'7, 160 Sr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.8000 79 51 504 64.6% 21.4% 41.8% 6.4 -112 6.1 60.0
Ronald Butler WR-Z
42 36 478 85.7% 11.4% 59.5% 11.4 64 11.5 56.9
Devonte Robinson WR-Z 6'2, 190 Sr. 2 stars (5.2) 0.8399 40 24 226 60.0% 10.8% 55.0% 5.7 -68 5.7 26.9
Wyatt Houston TE 6'5, 255 Jr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.7726 28 19 178 67.9% 7.6% 46.4% 6.4 -49 6.7 21.2
Hayden Weichers WR
14 10 84 71.4% 3.8% 64.3% 6.0 -35 6.2 10.0
Jefferson Court TE
13 6 26 46.2% 3.5% 76.9% 2.0 -52 2.1 3.1
Joe Hill RB
11 7 148 63.6% 3.0% 45.5% 13.5 63 16.6 17.6
LaJuan Hunt RB 5'8, 195 So. 2 stars (5.4) 0.7906 10 10 99 100.0% 2.7% 30.0% 9.9 -14 12.8 11.8
Damoun Patterson WR-X
10 2 9 20.0% 2.7% 60.0% 0.9 -25 0.9 1.1
Brandon Swindall WR 6'4, 205 Sr. 3 stars (5.5) 0.7000 8 5 37 62.5% 2.2% 62.5% 4.6 -24 4.5 4.4
Kennedy Williams RB 5'8, 160 Jr. NR NR 5 4 34 80.0% 1.4% 60.0% 6.8 -13 7.2 4.0
Rashad Hall RB 6'1, 215 Sr. 2 stars (5.2) 0.7000 5 1 0 20.0% 1.4% 20.0% 0.0 -17 0.0 0.0
Braelon Roberts WR 6'3, 190 So. 3 stars (5.6) 0.7600
Marcus Mosely TE 6'4, 220 RSFr. 3 stars (5.5) 0.8106
Tyler Fox WR 5'11, 175 RSFr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.8172
Chris Copier TE 6'6, 250 Jr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.7883
Chad Artist WR 6'3, 180 Fr. 2 stars (5.3) 0.8008

5. Chuckie (or whoever) has weapons

Hunter Sharp was just beginning to emerge as a big weapon. The JUCO transfer caught two passes for 37 yards in the first two games but proceeded to catch 38 for 605 over the next four. He and Garretson established a connection before Garretson went down, and Sharp’s production slumped. But between Sharp, LaJuan Hunt, and speedster JoJo Natson, USU has some exciting options.

[Update: Sharp is suspended for the first two games, against Southern Utah and Utah. And Natson has been dismissed.]

Natson is one of the country’s more entertaining players. He weighs 160 pounds (and looks about 145) but boasts crazy speed, and Kevin McGiven used him in creative ways -- 79 targets, 50 carries -- in an attempt to get him the ball on the edge. Every touch is like a punt return (and he’s a spectacular punt returner). He isn’t built to handle more than eight to 10 touches per game, but it will be interesting to see how Heupel uses him.

It will also be interesting to see how receiver Brandon Swindall bounces back from an Achilles injury. The former three-star recruit was USU’s No. 4 receiver in 2013 but played in only two games last year. If he hasn’t bounced all the way back, then a young receiver like sophomore Braelon Roberts, redshirt freshman Tyler Fox, or incoming freshman Chad Artist might have to fill a role.

It’s hard to know what to think about the line. Keeton’s quick passing and elusiveness are conducive to good sack rates, but both Garretson and Myers got taken down a lot. Plus, USU’s power success rate and stuff rate (run stops at or behind the line) were dismal, and all-conference left tackle Kevin Whimpey is gone.

There’s experience; four of last year’s starters return, as does spot starter Austin Albrecht, and UCLA transfer Ben Wysocki and two JUCOs (Preston Brooksby, Jude Hockel) enter the mix. I assume the line won’t be worse, but it might need to be quite a bit better for the run game to click like Heupel wants. It didn’t this spring, though it was going up against USU’s stellar run defense.

Offensive Line

Category Adj.
Line Yds
Std.
Downs

LY/carry
Pass.
Downs

LY/carry
Opp.
Rate
Power
Success
Rate
Stuff
Rate
Adj.
Sack Rate
Std.
Downs

Sack Rt.
Pass.
Downs

Sack Rt.
Team 89.6 2.73 3.12 39.6% 55.3% 24.6% 101.9 6.7% 4.8%
Rank 106 94 82 60 118 118 67 100 23
Player Pos. Ht, Wt 2015
Year
Rivals 247 Comp. Career Starts Honors/Notes
Kevin Whimpey LT 40 2014 1st All-MWC
Jake Simonich RT 6'5, 295 Jr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.7838 15
Austin Stephens C 6'3, 305 Jr. 2 stars (5.2) 0.7800 14
Taani Fisilau RG 6'2, 295 Sr. 3 stars (5.6) 0.8157 12
Tyshon Mosley [suspended for two games] LG 6'5, 290 So. 2 stars (5.2) 0.7847 11
Bill Vavau LG
3
Austin Albrecht LT 6'5, 295 Jr. 2 stars (5.3) 0.7000 2
Joe Summers C
0
Brandon Taukeiaho RG 6'4, 315 So. 2 stars (5.2) 0.7667 0
Andrew Chen OT 6'3, 280 So. 2 stars (5.4) 0.7606 0
Cody Boyer OL 6'6, 270 RSFr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.7859 0
Ben Wysocki (UCLA) OL 6'4, 285 Sr. 3 stars (5.5) 0.8489
Preston Brooksby OL 6'5, 290 Jr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.7759
Jude Hockel OL 6'5, 295 Jr. NR 0.7800
Wade Meacham OL 6'6, 260 Fr. NR 0.8068

Defense

FIVE FACTORS -- DEFENSE
Raw Category Rk Opp. Adj. Category Rk
EXPLOSIVENESS IsoPPP 0.76 23 IsoPPP+ 129.1 9
EFFICIENCY Succ. Rt. 34.5% 7 Succ. Rt. + 107.6 37
FIELD POSITION Off. Avg. FP 31.8 28 Off. FP+ 102.0 38
FINISHING DRIVES Pts. Per Trip in 40 3.6 11 Redzone S&P+ 117.0 20
TURNOVERS EXPECTED 27.5 ACTUAL 30.0 +2.5
Category Yards/
Game Rk
S&P+ Rk Success
Rt. Rk
PPP+ Rk
OVERALL 31 17 33 9
RUSHING 24 20 48 11
PASSING 58 12 28 11
Standard Downs 21 35 11
Passing Downs 15 33 15
Q1 Rk 29 1st Down Rk 30
Q2 Rk 16 2nd Down Rk 21
Q3 Rk 36 3rd Down Rk 32
Q4 Rk 37

6. This should be familiar

Few defenses combine aggressiveness with big-play prevention like Utah State. In 2014, the Aggies attacked the run on standard downs and attacked the passer on passing downs.

Opponents had to go against the current, throwing 4 percent more than the national average on standard downs and rushing 3 percent more on passing downs, and it still didn’t work. USU had top-40 success rates and top-50 sack rates and stuff rates.

What made the Aggies so solid is that they did this while ranking in the top 10 in big-play prevention (IsoPPP+). They played big-play offenses (Boise State, Tennessee, Colorado State) and gave up few big plays.

New coordinator Kevin Clune didn’t have the benefit of USU’s talent when he served as Hawaii’s coordinator, and predictably, the aggressive tactics he had honed at USU didn’t pay off. But he should know what to do with what he’s got in Logan, and one assumes the Utah State defense will look familiar.

Defensive Line

Category Adj.
Line Yds
Std.
Downs

LY/carry
Pass.
Downs

LY/carry
Opp.
Rate
Power
Success
Rate
Stuff
Rate
Adj.
Sack Rate
Std.
Downs

Sack Rt.
Pass.
Downs

Sack Rt.
Team 98.6 2.76 3.02 38.3% 65.9% 20.3% 108.3 7.6% 8.8%
Rank 69 39 39 55 56 49 48 11 40
Name Pos Ht, Wt 2015
Year
Rivals 247 Comp. GP Tackles % of Team TFL Sacks Int PBU FF FR
Jordan Nielsen DE 6'5, 270 Sr. NR NR 14 35.0 4.3% 6.5 2.0 0 2 0 0
B.J. Larsen DE
14 29.5 3.6% 13.5 9.0 1 1 0 0
Travis Seefeldt (injured) NG 6'2, 300 Sr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.7000 14 24.0 3.0% 6.0 2.0 0 2 0 0
Ricky Ali'ifua DE 6'3, 275 Jr. 2 stars (5.2) 0.7400 14 13.5 1.7% 2.0 0.0 0 1 0 0
Elvis Kamana-Matagi NG
14 12.5 1.5% 2.5 1.0 0 0 0 0
Siua Taufa DE 6'1, 260 Jr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.7000 13 10.5 1.3% 2.5 1.0 0 0 0 0
John Taylor DE 6'2, 270 Sr. 2 stars (5.2) 0.7000 14 6.5 0.8% 1.0 1.0 0 0 0 0
David Moala NG 6'2, 300 Sr. 3 stars (5.6) 0.8115 11 5.0 0.6% 1.5 0.5 0 0 0 0
Edmund Faimalo DE 6'3, 280 Jr. 2 stars (5.2) 0.7900







Linebackers

Name Pos Ht, Wt 2015
Year
Rivals 247 Comp. GP Tackles % of Team TFL Sacks Int PBU FF FR
Zach Vigil ILB
14 116.5 14.3% 19.5 9.0 1 4 1 0
Nick Vigil OLB 6'2, 230 Jr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.8063 13 92.0 11.3% 17.0 7.0 1 2 5 0
Kyler Fackrell (2013) OLB 6'5, 250 Sr. NR NR 14 59.5 7.6% 13.0 5.0 1 1 2 0
LT Filiaga LB 6'0, 240 Sr. 3 stars (5.6) 0.8505 10 43.0 5.3% 4.5 1.0 0 3 0 0
Torrey Green OLB 6'2, 230 Sr. NR NR 12 27.5 3.4% 8.5 3.0 1 0 1 1
Michael Okonkwo ILB 6'1, 230 Sr. NR NR 14 10.5 1.3% 0.5 0.0 0 0 0 0
Jarom Baldomero ILB 6'0, 235 Sr. NR NR 14 9.5 1.2% 1.5 0.0 0 0 0 0
Anthony Williams OLB 6'3, 230 Sr. NR NR 13 7.0 0.9% 0.5 0.0 0 0 1 0
Leki Uasike ILB 5'11, 230 Jr. NR NR
Ian Togiai OLB 6'2, 250 So. 2 stars (5.2) 0.8100
La'Bradford Harold ILB 5'11, 225 Sr. 3 stars (5.5) 0.7000
Chase Christiansen LB 6'2, 210 RSFr. 2 stars (5.2) 0.7000
Daniel Langi LB 6'0, 220 Fr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.8215
Joe Riggins LB 6'2, 205 Fr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.8117








7. Ode to Nick Vigil

USU must replace its two best pass rushers, end B.J. Larsen and linebacker Zach Vigil. The Aggies have a strong defensive reputation, but we can’t assume that the level of production will remain the same each year.

Still, it’s hard to worry much. Tackle Travis Seefeldt is a keeper [Update: He’s unlikely to play in 2015 after a car accident], ends Siua Taufa and John Taylor produced when given the opportunity, JUCO transfer Edmund Faimalo [who is being “brought along slowly” after injuries in that same wreck] is an impressive specimen, and USU appears loaded at linebacker. Not only do three starters return, but so do all of last year’s backups, and some young three-star talent could work in.

Mostly, it’s hard to worry because there’s still a Vigil in uniform, and he’s pretty spectacular. Nick Vigil was second on the team with 17 tackles for loss, third with seven sacks, second in the country with five forced fumbles ... oh yeah, and he ran the ball at least eight times in three games and scored three touchdowns. He’s a football player: put him somewhere, and watch him make plays.

Vigil, LT Filiaga, and Torrey Green will make up one of the nation’s best linebacking corps, no matter who else starts there.

Secondary

Name Pos Ht, Wt 2015
Year
Rivals 247 Comp. GP Tackles % of Team TFL Sacks Int PBU FF FR
Frankie Sutera SS
14 68.0 8.4% 6.5 3.5 7 2 1 0
Devin Centers SS 5'9, 200 Jr. NR NR 13 56.0 6.9% 6.5 3 1 10 0 2
Brian Suite FS
14 55.0 6.8% 1 0 2 9 0 0
Jalen Davis CB 5'10, 170 So. 2 stars (5.3) 0.7000 13 51.5 6.3% 4 1 2 7 1 0
Rashard Stewart CB
14 32.0 3.9% 0.5 0 0 8 0 0
Daniel Gray CB 5'11, 180 Jr. 3 stars (5.5) 0.8292 13 24.0 3.0% 0 0 0 5 0 1
Bryant Hayes CB 5'9, 175 Sr. 2 stars (5.3) NR 12 18.5 2.3% 6 4 0 5 0 0
Deshane Hines CB 5'10, 180 Sr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.7593 14 16.0 2.0% 0 0 2 1 0 0
Tyler Floyd CB 5'9, 185 Sr. NR 0.7333 14 9.0 1.1% 1 0 1 1 0 0
Marwin Evans FS 6'1, 210 Sr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.8100 14 6.5 0.8% 0 0 0 0 1 0
Jentz Painter CB 6'8, 175 Jr. NR NR 14 4.0 0.5% 1 1 0 0 0 0
Kelvin Lee FS 5'10, 185 Sr. 2 stars (5.3) NR 11 4.0 0.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Marquan Ellison CB 5'11, 185 Jr. 2 stars (5.2) 0.7500 11 2.0 0.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Myron Turner FS 5'11, 180 So. 2 stars (5.4) 0.8052
Aaron Wade SS 6'2, 200 RSFr. 2 stars (5.4) 0.7593
Wesley Bailey DB 6'2, 190 Jr. NR 0.8367
Cameron Haney CB 5'11, 175 Fr. 3 stars (5.6) 0.8425








8. Plenty gone and plenty back

The glass is either half-full or half-empty.

On one hand, junior safety Devin Centers and three active, aggressive cornerbacks -- Jalen Davis, Daniel Gray, Bryant Hayes (combined: 10 tackles for loss, five sacks, two interceptions, 17 breakups) -- are back, as are most second stringers [Update: Hayes is suspended for the first two games, against Southern Utah and Utah]. Plus, three-star JUCO transfer Wesley Bailey and freshman Cameron Haney, one of the gems of the February signing class, are available.

On the other hand, two other key safeties (Frankie Sutera and Brian Suite, who combined for 7.5 tackles for loss, nine picks, and 11 breakups) are gone, as is corner Rashard Stewart. USU has to replace three of its top five tackers in the secondary a year after losing seven of 10. That’s a lot of churn, and if you haven’t recruited/developed well, it could cause major depth issues.

There is little reason to doubt USU’s defense, but a couple of injuries, especially at safety, could be costly.

Special Teams

Punter Ht, Wt 2015
Year
Punts Avg TB FC I20 FC/I20
Ratio
Jaron Bentrude 83 40.8 5 34 32 79.5%
Jake Thompson 6'0, 215 Jr. 1 35.0 1 0 0 0.0%
Kicker Ht, Wt 2015
Year
Kickoffs Avg TB OOB TB%
Jake Thompson 6'0, 215 Jr. 66 61.1 26 4 39.4%
Jaron Bentrude 8 58.5 1 0 12.5%
Place-Kicker Ht, Wt 2015
Year
PAT FG
(0-39)
Pct FG
(40+)
Pct
Nick Diaz 45-48 9-13 69.2% 3-4 75.0%
Jake Thompson 6'0, 215 Jr. 0-0 0-0 N/A 0-4 0.0%
Returner Pos. Ht, Wt 2015
Year
Returns Avg. TD
Kennedy Williams KR 5'8, 160 Jr. 14 21.6 0
Hunter Sharp KR 6'0, 200 Sr. 6 24.3 0
JoJo Natson PR 5'7, 160 Sr. 25 11.7 2
Hayden Weichers PR 4 0.8 0
Category Rk
Special Teams F/+ 94
Field Goal Efficiency 114
Punt Return Efficiency 33
Kick Return Efficiency 124
Punt Efficiency 71
Kickoff Efficiency 55
Opponents' Field Goal Efficiency 86

9. Can JoJo return kickoffs?

JoJo Natson is one of the nation’s best punt returners, but USU ranked 94th in special teams. Place-kicking was all sorts of shaky -- 69 percent on field goals under 40 yards, 38 percent over 40 -- and while Jaron Bentrude was a solid punter, he’s gone. But the strangest part was how inefficient USU was in returning kickoffs. Are we sure Natson can’t handle those duties?

[Update: He can’t. USU has since dismissed him.]

2015 Schedule & Projection Factors

2015 Schedule
Date Opponent 2014 F/+ Rk
3-Sep Southern Utah NR
11-Sep at Utah 29
19-Sep at Washington 58
3-Oct Colorado State 49
10-Oct at Fresno State 102
17-Oct Boise State 21
24-Oct at San Diego State 76
31-Oct Wyoming 113
7-Nov at New Mexico 94
14-Nov at Air Force 48
21-Nov Nevada 64
28-Nov BYU 46
Five-Year F/+ Rk 7.8% (49)
2- and 5-Year Recruiting Rk 105 / 103
2014 TO Margin/Adj. TO Margin* 9 / 4.0
2014 TO Luck/Game +1.8
Approx. Ret. Starters (Off. / Def.) 15 (8, 7)
2014 Second-order wins (difference) 11.0 (-1.0)

10. Is this the year the breaks go USU’s way?

Utah State has dealt with killer injuries and managed to lose to both Arkansas State and Colorado State last year despite outgaining each on a per-play basis. The Aggies are 19-9 under Matt Wells despite minimal help in the luck department.

So what happens if the breaks go the Aggies’ way for once? USU faces another impressive schedule, loaded with MWC Mountain opponents, BYU, and two Pac-12 foes. Boise State comes to Logan, and in theory virtually every game is winnable for a healthy USU.

Granted, there could be some growing pains associated with breaking in two new coordinators, but I think the transition should be reasonably easy. The philosophies of Heupel and Clune should work, and I expect another top-50 team.

Does the injury bug take this year off? Can USU send Keeton out on top of the Mountain West? Boise State is the conference’s safest bet, but Utah State might be the best backup option.

NFL
Brendan Sorsby stuck as NFL announces NO Supplemental Draft in 2026Brendan Sorsby stuck as NFL announces NO Supplemental Draft in 2026
NFL

Another setback for the QB.

By James Dator
College Football
The NCAA can appeal Brendan Sorsby’s shocking reinstatement, but Texas law isn’t on their sideThe NCAA can appeal Brendan Sorsby’s shocking reinstatement, but Texas law isn’t on their side
College Football

A big can of worms has been opened in college sports

By Mark Schofield
College Football
Here’s your first look at ‘College Football 27’ and ‘Madden 27’Here’s your first look at ‘College Football 27’ and ‘Madden 27’
College Football

Mascot game! Tush push!

By James Dator
NFL
Brendan Sorsby’s gambling allegations could end his college football career. Is NFL Supplemental Draft next?Brendan Sorsby’s gambling allegations could end his college football career. Is NFL Supplemental Draft next?
NFL

Brendan Sorsby calls out NCAA hypocrisy as his football future is uncertain

By Mark Schofield
College Football
NAACP urges black athletes to reject recruiting in racially gerrymandered statesNAACP urges black athletes to reject recruiting in racially gerrymandered states
College Football

The NAACP is asking athletes to take up the fight for voting rights.

By James Dator
College Football
Oregon coach asks recruits about their favorite ice cream, and it actually makes senseOregon coach asks recruits about their favorite ice cream, and it actually makes sense
College Football

Oregon coaches have a strange question for potential recruits.

By Mark Schofield