Skip to main content
Come Fan with UsWednesday, June 24, 2026

2016 New Mexico Bowl stats preview: New Mexico vs. UTSA advanced tale of the tape

NCAA Football: New Mexico at Arizona State
NCAA Football: New Mexico at Arizona State
Matt Kartozian-USA TODAY Sports

New Mexico Lobos (8-4) vs. UTSA Roadrunners (6-6)

December 17, 2016 ( 2:00 PM ET, ESPN )
Spread: New Mexico -7
S&P+ Projection: New Mexico (36.5-29.2)

Confused? Check out the advanced-stats glossary here.
Statistical profiles index.
Full Football Outsiders F/+ rankings can be found here.

The Basics
Category New Mexico UTSA
S&P+ (Rk) 74 104
Category New Mexico offense UTSA defense UTSA offense New Mexico defense
Yards per play (Rk) 6.72 (10) 5.52 (69) 5.10 (98) 6.20 (115)
Yards per game (Rk) 464.3 (30) 403.8 (59) 369.5 (99) 404.6 (61)
Points per possession (Rk) 3.13 (12) 2.19 (71) 2.32 (59) 2.63 (104)
Category New Mexico offense UTSA defense UTSA offense New Mexico defense
S&P+ (Rk) 35.6 (28) 33.0 (89) 24.2 (98) 38.6 (120)
Rushing S&P+ (Rk) 117.8 (18) 104.2 (49) 90.4 (108) 99.2 (68)
Passing S&P+ (Rk) 87.3 (105) 96.6 (79) 87.8 (101) 84.9 (120)
Standard Downs S&P+ (Rk) 107.0 (47) 101.8 (52) 84.5 (123) 93.7 (96)
Passing Downs S&P+ (Rk) 105.5 (62) 97.2 (82) 102.4 (69) 79.3 (124)
Q1 S&P+ (Rk) 128.5 (19) 99.6 (67) 97.9 (84) 80.6 (125)
Q2 S&P+ (Rk) 101.4 (70) 90.4 (100) 89.2 (110) 84.0 (117)
Q3 S&P+ (Rk) 100.2 (68) 98.2 (72) 90.2 (106) 96.9 (80)
Q4 S&P+ (Rk) 93.3 (99) 118.5 (15) 71.8 (128) 96.2 (76)
Five biggest advantages* (according to the advanced stats)

* or smallest disadvantages

New Mexico

  1. Standard Downs Sack Rate (No. 25 defense vs. No. 118 offense)
  2. Passing Downs Sack Rate (No. 35 defense vs. No. 124 offense)
  3. Adj. Sack Rate (No. 56 defense vs. No. 124 offense)
  4. Run Stuffs (No. 18 offense vs. No. 84 defense)
  5. Rushing Efficiency (Success Rate) (No. 50 defense vs. No. 113 offense)

UTSA

  1. Passing Efficiency (Success Rate) (No. 57 defense vs. No. 121 offense)
  2. Passing Downs Explosiveness (IsoPPP) (No. 65 offense vs. No. 124 defense)
  3. Field Position (No. 12 offense vs. No. 68 defense)
  4. Passing Downs S&P+ (No. 69 offense vs. No. 124 defense)
  5. Passing Downs Efficiency (Success Rate) (No. 68 offense vs. No. 113 defense)
Five Factors
Category New Mexico offense UTSA defense UTSA offense New Mexico defense
EXPLOSIVENESS 1.46 (3) 1.30 (95) 1.30 (52) 1.40 (117)
EFFICIENCY 45.1% (33) 41.3% (52) 40.6% (87) 43.4% (79)
FIELD POSITION 28.2 (98) 30.0 (85) 33.2 (12) 29.1 (68)
FINISHING DRIVES 5.2 (11) 4.4 (52) 4.6 (63) 5.4 (124)
TURNOVER MARGIN EXPECTED:
New Mexico 1.04 (63)
UTSA 4.08 (35)
ACTUAL
New Mexico -2 (77)
UTSA 4 (37)
Offensive Footprint
Category (Rk) New Mexico offense UTSA offense
Adj. Pace -0.1 (65) -1.6 (74)
Plays per game 69.1 (106) 72.4 (73)
Possessions per game 12.1 (116) 12.9 (70)
Std. Downs Run Rate 84.6% (5) 62.7% (48)
Pass. Downs Run Rate 55.1% (6) 33.5% (68)
% of solo tackles 70.6% (99) 73.6% (66)
Defensive Footprint
Category (Rk) New Mexico defense UTSA defense
Std. Downs Run Rate 61.6% (51) 57.7% (85)
Pass. Downs Run Rate 33.0% (77) 35.5% (55)
Overall Havoc Rate 15.4% (70) 16.1% (52)
Front 7 Havoc Rate 9.0% (57) 8.7% (71)
DB Havoc Rate 6.3% (62) 7.4% (31)
PD to INC 35.2% (46) 29.3% (105)

When New Mexico has the ball…

Standard Downs
New Mexico Offense UTSA Defense
Avg. Rk Avg. Rk Edge
Standard Downs S&P+ 107.0 47 101.8 52
Standard Downs Success Rate 50.6 30 46.2 52 New Mexico
Standard Downs IsoPPP 1.31 5 1.24 83 New Mexico big
SD Line Yards per Carry 3.47 7 3.00 67 New Mexico big
SD Sack Rate 4.4% 61 2.4% 117 New Mexico big
Passing Downs
New Mexico Offense UTSA Defense
Avg. Rk Avg. Rk Edge
Passing Downs S&P+ 105.5 62 97.2 82 New Mexico
Passing Downs Success Rate 31.9 56 32.1 80 New Mexico
Passing Downs IsoPPP 2.01 14 1.88 71 New Mexico big
PD Line Yards per Carry 3.36 59 3.13 53
PD Sack Rate 6% 37 10.1% 19 UTSA

When UTSA has the ball…

Standard Downs
UTSA Offense New Mexico Defense
Avg. Rk Avg. Rk Edge
Standard Downs S&P+ 84.5 123 93.7 96 New Mexico
Standard Downs Success Rate 44.9 98 47.3 58 New Mexico
Standard Downs IsoPPP 1.08 80 1.14 117 UTSA
SD Line Yards per Carry 2.96 72 3.00 67
SD Sack Rate 8% 118 6.8% 25 New Mexico big
Passing Downs
UTSA Offense New Mexico Defense
Avg. Rk Avg. Rk Edge
Passing Downs S&P+ 102.4 69 79.3 124 UTSA big
Passing Downs Success Rate 32.3 49 34.6 107 UTSA big
Passing Downs IsoPPP 1.85 35 1.74 105 UTSA big
PD Line Yards per Carry 3.21 75 2.69 24 New Mexico big
PD Sack Rate 14.1% 124 8.9% 35 New Mexico big

Stats via SportSource Analytics

NFL
Brendan Sorsby stuck as NFL announces NO Supplemental Draft in 2026Brendan Sorsby stuck as NFL announces NO Supplemental Draft in 2026
NFL

Another setback for the QB.

By James Dator
College Football
The NCAA can appeal Brendan Sorsby’s shocking reinstatement, but Texas law isn’t on their sideThe NCAA can appeal Brendan Sorsby’s shocking reinstatement, but Texas law isn’t on their side
College Football

A big can of worms has been opened in college sports

By Mark Schofield
College Football
Here’s your first look at ‘College Football 27’ and ‘Madden 27’Here’s your first look at ‘College Football 27’ and ‘Madden 27’
College Football

Mascot game! Tush push!

By James Dator
NFL
Brendan Sorsby’s gambling allegations could end his college football career. Is NFL Supplemental Draft next?Brendan Sorsby’s gambling allegations could end his college football career. Is NFL Supplemental Draft next?
NFL

Brendan Sorsby calls out NCAA hypocrisy as his football future is uncertain

By Mark Schofield
College Football
NAACP urges black athletes to reject recruiting in racially gerrymandered statesNAACP urges black athletes to reject recruiting in racially gerrymandered states
College Football

The NAACP is asking athletes to take up the fight for voting rights.

By James Dator
College Football
Oregon coach asks recruits about their favorite ice cream, and it actually makes senseOregon coach asks recruits about their favorite ice cream, and it actually makes sense
College Football

Oregon coaches have a strange question for potential recruits.

By Mark Schofield