Skip to main content
Come Fan with UsSaturday, June 20, 2026

2016 Camellia Bowl stats preview: Appalachian State vs. Toledo advanced tale of the tape

Appalachian State Mountaineers (9-3) vs. Toledo Rockets (9-3)

December 17, 2016 ( 5:30 PM ET, ESPN )
Spread: Toledo 0
S&P+ Projection: Appalachian State (30.5-30.2)

Confused? Check out the advanced-stats glossary here.
Statistical profiles index.
Full Football Outsiders F/+ rankings can be found here.

The Basics
Category Appalachian State Toledo
S&P+ (Rk) 32 35
Category Appalachian State offense Toledo defense Toledo offense Appalachian State defense
Yards per play (Rk) 5.95 (40) 5.56 (71) 6.97 (6) 4.77 (21)
Yards per game (Rk) 426.9 (57) 387.6 (52) 532.4 (4) 331.1 (18)
Points per possession (Rk) 2.33 (58) 2.01 (51) 2.99 (17) 1.38 (9)
Category Appalachian State offense Toledo defense Toledo offense Appalachian State defense
S&P+ (Rk) 30.8 (56) 29.9 (70) 38.6 (18) 22.1 (24)
Rushing S&P+ (Rk) 115.3 (23) 96.6 (78) 106.4 (48) 106.3 (42)
Passing S&P+ (Rk) 116.0 (29) 100.5 (61) 131.6 (7) 121.0 (14)
Standard Downs S&P+ (Rk) 114.6 (22) 97.6 (74) 113.4 (28) 109.1 (35)
Passing Downs S&P+ (Rk) 110.3 (45) 98.8 (75) 133.2 (8) 124.4 (15)
Q1 S&P+ (Rk) 115.4 (35) 103.3 (51) 114.4 (37) 111.9 (33)
Q2 S&P+ (Rk) 119.6 (24) 120.1 (18) 103.1 (63) 109.4 (42)
Q3 S&P+ (Rk) 108.9 (46) 94.3 (90) 146.1 (1) 112.5 (27)
Q4 S&P+ (Rk) 97.1 (88) 82.1 (123) 127.6 (4) 116.0 (21)
Five biggest advantages* (according to the advanced stats)

* or smallest disadvantages

Appalachian State

  1. Standard Downs Sack Rate (No. 11 offense vs. No. 121 defense)
  2. Rushing Explosiveness (IsoPPP) (No. 19 offense vs. No. 113 defense)
  3. Field Position (No. 37 defense vs. No. 121 offense)
  4. Standard Downs Explosiveness (IsoPPP) (No. 30 offense vs. No. 105 defense)
  5. First Down S&P+ (No. 14 offense vs. No. 88 defense)

Toledo

  1. Adj. Line Yards (No. 27 offense vs. No. 103 defense)
  2. Standard Downs Sack Rate (No. 6 offense vs. No. 74 defense)
  3. Run Stuffs (No. 11 offense vs. No. 71 defense)
  4. Third Down S&P+ (No. 47 defense vs. No. 96 offense)
  5. Short-Yardage Rushing (No. 75 defense vs. No. 103 offense)
Five Factors
Category Appalachian State offense Toledo defense Toledo offense Appalachian State defense
EXPLOSIVENESS 1.29 (56) 1.38 (115) 1.32 (41) 1.25 (67)
EFFICIENCY 47.9% (15) 38.8% (34) 49.0% (9) 36.6% (21)
FIELD POSITION 30.8 (40) 27.4 (25) 27.0 (121) 28.0 (37)
FINISHING DRIVES 4.5 (67) 4.4 (64) 5.3 (8) 3.7 (16)
TURNOVER MARGIN EXPECTED:
Appalachian State -0.55 (79)
Toledo -0.95 (82)
ACTUAL
Appalachian State 8 (14)
Toledo -4 (94)
Offensive Footprint
Category (Rk) Appalachian State offense Toledo offense
Adj. Pace -0.5 (67) 1.7 (49)
Plays per game 71.8 (80) 76.3 (44)
Possessions per game 12.5 (90) 13.0 (64)
Std. Downs Run Rate 65.9% (31) 58.1% (77)
Pass. Downs Run Rate 48.2% (9) 36.1% (44)
% of solo tackles 70.2% (100) 73.2% (74)
Defensive Footprint
Category (Rk) Appalachian State defense Toledo defense
Std. Downs Run Rate 51.5% (120) 59.0% (70)
Pass. Downs Run Rate 33.6% (67) 33.3% (71)
Overall Havoc Rate 16.1% (54) 14.9% (86)
Front 7 Havoc Rate 10.0% (47) 8.7% (70)
DB Havoc Rate 6.1% (72) 6.1% (67)
PD to INC 31.5% (83) 27.4% (115)

When Appalachian State has the ball…

Standard Downs
Appalachian State Offense Toledo Defense
Avg. Rk Avg. Rk Edge
Standard Downs S&P+ 114.6 22 97.6 74 Appalachian State big
Standard Downs Success Rate 55.5 5 42.9 28 Appalachian State
Standard Downs IsoPPP 1.12 62 1.07 121 Appalachian State big
SD Line Yards per Carry 3.09 52 2.83 48
SD Sack Rate 2.4% 11 2.2% 121 Appalachian State big
Passing Downs
Appalachian State Offense Toledo Defense
Avg. Rk Avg. Rk Edge
Passing Downs S&P+ 110.3 45 98.8 75 Appalachian State
Passing Downs Success Rate 28.5 95 31.2 66 Toledo
Passing Downs IsoPPP 2.10 6 1.95 33 Appalachian State
PD Line Yards per Carry 3.38 53 3.64 107 Appalachian State big
PD Sack Rate 4% 12 8.3% 51 Appalachian State

When Toledo has the ball…

Standard Downs
Toledo Offense Appalachian State Defense
Avg. Rk Avg. Rk Edge
Standard Downs S&P+ 113.4 28 109.1 35
Standard Downs Success Rate 51.1 26 43.5 32
Standard Downs IsoPPP 1.16 45 1.27 43
SD Line Yards per Carry 3.39 12 2.93 62 Toledo
SD Sack Rate 2.2% 6 4.5% 74 Toledo big
Passing Downs
Toledo Offense Appalachian State Defense
Avg. Rk Avg. Rk Edge
Passing Downs S&P+ 133.2 8 124.4 15
Passing Downs Success Rate 43.4 4 23.2 8
Passing Downs IsoPPP 1.82 46 1.65 114 Toledo big
PD Line Yards per Carry 3.35 61 3.50 95 Toledo
PD Sack Rate 4.6% 16 8.6% 43 Toledo

Stats via SportSource Analytics

College Football
The NCAA can appeal Brendan Sorsby’s shocking reinstatement, but Texas law isn’t on their sideThe NCAA can appeal Brendan Sorsby’s shocking reinstatement, but Texas law isn’t on their side
College Football

A big can of worms has been opened in college sports

By Mark Schofield
College Football
Here’s your first look at ‘College Football 27’ and ‘Madden 27’Here’s your first look at ‘College Football 27’ and ‘Madden 27’
College Football

Mascot game! Tush push!

By James Dator
NFL
Brendan Sorsby’s gambling allegations could end his college football career. Is NFL Supplemental Draft next?Brendan Sorsby’s gambling allegations could end his college football career. Is NFL Supplemental Draft next?
NFL

Brendan Sorsby calls out NCAA hypocrisy as his football future is uncertain

By Mark Schofield
College Football
NAACP urges black athletes to reject recruiting in racially gerrymandered statesNAACP urges black athletes to reject recruiting in racially gerrymandered states
College Football

The NAACP is asking athletes to take up the fight for voting rights.

By James Dator
College Football
Oregon coach asks recruits about their favorite ice cream, and it actually makes senseOregon coach asks recruits about their favorite ice cream, and it actually makes sense
College Football

Oregon coaches have a strange question for potential recruits.

By Mark Schofield
NFL
Why Jeremiyah Love brings top-5 value to NFL Draft as a RBWhy Jeremiyah Love brings top-5 value to NFL Draft as a RB
NFL

The Notre Dame star is the rare running back worth a top-10 or even top-5 pick.

By Mark Schofield