Skip to main content
Come Fan with UsSunday, August 9, 2026

2016 Sun Bowl stats preview: Stanford vs. North Carolina advanced tale of the tape

NCAA Football: Rice at Stanford
NCAA Football: Rice at Stanford
Kyle Terada-USA TODAY Sports

Stanford Cardinal (9-3) vs. North Carolina Tar Heels (8-4)

December 30, 2016 ( 2:00 PM ET, CBS )
Spread: Stanford -3.5
S&P+ Projection: Stanford (29.2-29.0)

Confused? Check out the advanced-stats glossary here.
Statistical profiles index.
Full Football Outsiders F/+ rankings can be found here.

The Basics
Category Stanford North Carolina
S&P+ (Rk) 21 22
Category Stanford offense North Carolina defense North Carolina offense Stanford defense
Yards per play (Rk) 5.53 (67) 5.17 (44) 6.33 (17) 5.04 (35)
Yards per game (Rk) 367.4 (101) 412.8 (68) 430.7 (54) 356.3 (27)
Points per possession (Rk) 2.25 (67) 1.99 (50) 2.78 (25) 1.74 (30)
Category Stanford offense North Carolina defense North Carolina offense Stanford defense
S&P+ (Rk) 30.8 (58) 27.5 (48) 37.1 (23) 21.1 (19)
Rushing S&P+ (Rk) 121.5 (11) 94.4 (87) 115.2 (25) 116.4 (21)
Passing S&P+ (Rk) 92.3 (92) 99.0 (67) 122.1 (18) 111.4 (30)
Standard Downs S&P+ (Rk) 108.1 (41) 99.0 (67) 114.7 (21) 120.8 (10)
Passing Downs S&P+ (Rk) 107.2 (55) 98.3 (79) 135.8 (7) 105.5 (51)
Q1 S&P+ (Rk) 104.9 (59) 98.3 (75) 129.9 (11) 116.0 (24)
Q2 S&P+ (Rk) 115.3 (35) 98.7 (78) 118.1 (26) 103.3 (56)
Q3 S&P+ (Rk) 109.6 (42) 99.8 (65) 115.7 (27) 116.9 (19)
Q4 S&P+ (Rk) 91.3 (104) 103.5 (55) 107.0 (47) 116.7 (17)
Five biggest advantages* (according to the advanced stats)

* or smallest disadvantages

Stanford

  1. Run Stuffs (No. 9 offense vs. No. 122 defense)
  2. Adj. Line Yards (No. 24 offense vs. No. 108 defense)
  3. Rushing S&P+ (No. 11 offense vs. No. 87 defense)
  4. Field Position (No. 5 defense vs. No. 78 offense)
  5. Rushing Explosiveness (IsoPPP) (No. 5 offense vs. No. 67 defense)

North Carolina

  1. Adj. Sack Rate (No. 64 defense vs. No. 125 offense)
  2. Standard Downs Sack Rate (No. 71 defense vs. No. 128 offense)
  3. Passing Downs Explosiveness (IsoPPP) (No. 7 offense vs. No. 55 defense)
  4. Third Down S&P+ (No. 25 offense vs. No. 69 defense)
  5. Passing Downs S&P+ (No. 7 offense vs. No. 51 defense)
Five Factors
Category Stanford offense North Carolina defense North Carolina offense Stanford defense
EXPLOSIVENESS 1.30 (48) 1.16 (16) 1.42 (12) 1.25 (62)
EFFICIENCY 43.2% (55) 45.9% (109) 46.2% (23) 38.8% (35)
FIELD POSITION 33.3 (9) 28.0 (39) 29.0 (78) 25.7 (5)
FINISHING DRIVES 4.1 (104) 4.1 (37) 4.8 (41) 4.1 (31)
TURNOVER MARGIN EXPECTED:
Stanford -0.56 (80)
North Carolina 9.04 (5)
ACTUAL
Stanford -1 (72)
North Carolina 1 (56)
Offensive Footprint
Category (Rk) Stanford offense North Carolina offense
Adj. Pace -6.6 (116) -7.8 (121)
Plays per game 66.5 (121) 68.0 (115)
Possessions per game 11.8 (121) 11.9 (119)
Std. Downs Run Rate 67.5% (23) 50.3% (112)
Pass. Downs Run Rate 40.8% (23) 26.6% (109)
% of solo tackles 73.0% (77) 74.3% (58)
Defensive Footprint
Category (Rk) Stanford defense North Carolina defense
Std. Downs Run Rate 56.2% (99) 68.1% (13)
Pass. Downs Run Rate 23.8% (126) 45.0% (2)
Overall Havoc Rate 15.3% (71) 12.4% (113)
Front 7 Havoc Rate 8.8% (64) 7.6% (100)
DB Havoc Rate 6.4% (53) 4.7% (116)
PD to INC 31.3% (85) 32.4% (75)

When Stanford has the ball…

Standard Downs
Stanford Offense North Carolina Defense
Avg. Rk Avg. Rk Edge
Standard Downs S&P+ 108.1 41 99.0 67 Stanford
Standard Downs Success Rate 48.1 59 50.6 104 Stanford
Standard Downs IsoPPP 1.15 51 1.03 39 North Carolina
SD Line Yards per Carry 3.46 8 3.37 117 Stanford big
SD Sack Rate 12.3% 128 4.6% 71 North Carolina big
Passing Downs
Stanford Offense North Carolina Defense
Avg. Rk Avg. Rk Edge
Passing Downs S&P+ 107.2 55 98.3 79 Stanford
Passing Downs Success Rate 32.3 48 34.2 104 Stanford big
Passing Downs IsoPPP 1.81 49 1.78 11 North Carolina
PD Line Yards per Carry 3.33 63 2.92 40 North Carolina
PD Sack Rate 7.6% 61 8.2% 55

When North Carolina has the ball…

Standard Downs
North Carolina Offense Stanford Defense
Avg. Rk Avg. Rk Edge
Standard Downs S&P+ 114.7 21 120.8 10 Stanford
Standard Downs Success Rate 48.6 50 42.8 27 Stanford
Standard Downs IsoPPP 1.28 13 1.05 27 North Carolina
SD Line Yards per Carry 3.02 65 2.79 42 Stanford
SD Sack Rate 4.3% 57 7.8% 13 Stanford
Passing Downs
North Carolina Offense Stanford Defense
Avg. Rk Avg. Rk Edge
Passing Downs S&P+ 135.8 7 105.5 51 North Carolina
Passing Downs Success Rate 40.8 8 31.6 74 North Carolina big
Passing Downs IsoPPP 1.78 58 1.53 84 North Carolina
PD Line Yards per Carry 3.32 64 3.15 60
PD Sack Rate 5% 20 8% 61 North Carolina

Stats via SportSource Analytics

College Football
College football’s 26 Most Important People in 2026College football’s 26 Most Important People in 2026
College Football

These are the names that will define the college football season.

By Mark Schofield
College Football
Purdue’s new AD tried to roast Indiana football, but ended up making a fool of himselfPurdue’s new AD tried to roast Indiana football, but ended up making a fool of himself
College Football
Texas Tech’s next move at QB could define its season after Brendan Sorsby fiascoTexas Tech’s next move at QB could define its season after Brendan Sorsby fiasco
College Football
6 college football teams that could surprise everyone in 20266 college football teams that could surprise everyone in 2026
College Football

These teams are taking a leap this season.

By Mark Schofield
College Football
What can Indiana and Curt Cignetti do for an encore?What can Indiana and Curt Cignetti do for an encore?
College Football

Indiana football expects to be the same machine even with a new QB

By Mark Schofield
College Football
College football’s 20 best transfers of the 2026 seasonCollege football’s 20 best transfers of the 2026 season
College Football

20 transfers that will define the 2020 college football season.

By Mark Schofield