Skip to main content
Come Fan with UsWednesday, June 24, 2026

2016 Sun Bowl stats preview: Stanford vs. North Carolina advanced tale of the tape

NCAA Football: Rice at Stanford
NCAA Football: Rice at Stanford
Kyle Terada-USA TODAY Sports

Stanford Cardinal (9-3) vs. North Carolina Tar Heels (8-4)

December 30, 2016 ( 2:00 PM ET, CBS )
Spread: Stanford -3.5
S&P+ Projection: Stanford (29.2-29.0)

Confused? Check out the advanced-stats glossary here.
Statistical profiles index.
Full Football Outsiders F/+ rankings can be found here.

The Basics
Category Stanford North Carolina
S&P+ (Rk) 21 22
Category Stanford offense North Carolina defense North Carolina offense Stanford defense
Yards per play (Rk) 5.53 (67) 5.17 (44) 6.33 (17) 5.04 (35)
Yards per game (Rk) 367.4 (101) 412.8 (68) 430.7 (54) 356.3 (27)
Points per possession (Rk) 2.25 (67) 1.99 (50) 2.78 (25) 1.74 (30)
Category Stanford offense North Carolina defense North Carolina offense Stanford defense
S&P+ (Rk) 30.8 (58) 27.5 (48) 37.1 (23) 21.1 (19)
Rushing S&P+ (Rk) 121.5 (11) 94.4 (87) 115.2 (25) 116.4 (21)
Passing S&P+ (Rk) 92.3 (92) 99.0 (67) 122.1 (18) 111.4 (30)
Standard Downs S&P+ (Rk) 108.1 (41) 99.0 (67) 114.7 (21) 120.8 (10)
Passing Downs S&P+ (Rk) 107.2 (55) 98.3 (79) 135.8 (7) 105.5 (51)
Q1 S&P+ (Rk) 104.9 (59) 98.3 (75) 129.9 (11) 116.0 (24)
Q2 S&P+ (Rk) 115.3 (35) 98.7 (78) 118.1 (26) 103.3 (56)
Q3 S&P+ (Rk) 109.6 (42) 99.8 (65) 115.7 (27) 116.9 (19)
Q4 S&P+ (Rk) 91.3 (104) 103.5 (55) 107.0 (47) 116.7 (17)
Five biggest advantages* (according to the advanced stats)

* or smallest disadvantages

Stanford

  1. Run Stuffs (No. 9 offense vs. No. 122 defense)
  2. Adj. Line Yards (No. 24 offense vs. No. 108 defense)
  3. Rushing S&P+ (No. 11 offense vs. No. 87 defense)
  4. Field Position (No. 5 defense vs. No. 78 offense)
  5. Rushing Explosiveness (IsoPPP) (No. 5 offense vs. No. 67 defense)

North Carolina

  1. Adj. Sack Rate (No. 64 defense vs. No. 125 offense)
  2. Standard Downs Sack Rate (No. 71 defense vs. No. 128 offense)
  3. Passing Downs Explosiveness (IsoPPP) (No. 7 offense vs. No. 55 defense)
  4. Third Down S&P+ (No. 25 offense vs. No. 69 defense)
  5. Passing Downs S&P+ (No. 7 offense vs. No. 51 defense)
Five Factors
Category Stanford offense North Carolina defense North Carolina offense Stanford defense
EXPLOSIVENESS 1.30 (48) 1.16 (16) 1.42 (12) 1.25 (62)
EFFICIENCY 43.2% (55) 45.9% (109) 46.2% (23) 38.8% (35)
FIELD POSITION 33.3 (9) 28.0 (39) 29.0 (78) 25.7 (5)
FINISHING DRIVES 4.1 (104) 4.1 (37) 4.8 (41) 4.1 (31)
TURNOVER MARGIN EXPECTED:
Stanford -0.56 (80)
North Carolina 9.04 (5)
ACTUAL
Stanford -1 (72)
North Carolina 1 (56)
Offensive Footprint
Category (Rk) Stanford offense North Carolina offense
Adj. Pace -6.6 (116) -7.8 (121)
Plays per game 66.5 (121) 68.0 (115)
Possessions per game 11.8 (121) 11.9 (119)
Std. Downs Run Rate 67.5% (23) 50.3% (112)
Pass. Downs Run Rate 40.8% (23) 26.6% (109)
% of solo tackles 73.0% (77) 74.3% (58)
Defensive Footprint
Category (Rk) Stanford defense North Carolina defense
Std. Downs Run Rate 56.2% (99) 68.1% (13)
Pass. Downs Run Rate 23.8% (126) 45.0% (2)
Overall Havoc Rate 15.3% (71) 12.4% (113)
Front 7 Havoc Rate 8.8% (64) 7.6% (100)
DB Havoc Rate 6.4% (53) 4.7% (116)
PD to INC 31.3% (85) 32.4% (75)

When Stanford has the ball…

Standard Downs
Stanford Offense North Carolina Defense
Avg. Rk Avg. Rk Edge
Standard Downs S&P+ 108.1 41 99.0 67 Stanford
Standard Downs Success Rate 48.1 59 50.6 104 Stanford
Standard Downs IsoPPP 1.15 51 1.03 39 North Carolina
SD Line Yards per Carry 3.46 8 3.37 117 Stanford big
SD Sack Rate 12.3% 128 4.6% 71 North Carolina big
Passing Downs
Stanford Offense North Carolina Defense
Avg. Rk Avg. Rk Edge
Passing Downs S&P+ 107.2 55 98.3 79 Stanford
Passing Downs Success Rate 32.3 48 34.2 104 Stanford big
Passing Downs IsoPPP 1.81 49 1.78 11 North Carolina
PD Line Yards per Carry 3.33 63 2.92 40 North Carolina
PD Sack Rate 7.6% 61 8.2% 55

When North Carolina has the ball…

Standard Downs
North Carolina Offense Stanford Defense
Avg. Rk Avg. Rk Edge
Standard Downs S&P+ 114.7 21 120.8 10 Stanford
Standard Downs Success Rate 48.6 50 42.8 27 Stanford
Standard Downs IsoPPP 1.28 13 1.05 27 North Carolina
SD Line Yards per Carry 3.02 65 2.79 42 Stanford
SD Sack Rate 4.3% 57 7.8% 13 Stanford
Passing Downs
North Carolina Offense Stanford Defense
Avg. Rk Avg. Rk Edge
Passing Downs S&P+ 135.8 7 105.5 51 North Carolina
Passing Downs Success Rate 40.8 8 31.6 74 North Carolina big
Passing Downs IsoPPP 1.78 58 1.53 84 North Carolina
PD Line Yards per Carry 3.32 64 3.15 60
PD Sack Rate 5% 20 8% 61 North Carolina

Stats via SportSource Analytics

NFL
Brendan Sorsby stuck as NFL announces NO Supplemental Draft in 2026Brendan Sorsby stuck as NFL announces NO Supplemental Draft in 2026
NFL

Another setback for the QB.

By James Dator
College Football
The NCAA can appeal Brendan Sorsby’s shocking reinstatement, but Texas law isn’t on their sideThe NCAA can appeal Brendan Sorsby’s shocking reinstatement, but Texas law isn’t on their side
College Football

A big can of worms has been opened in college sports

By Mark Schofield
College Football
Here’s your first look at ‘College Football 27’ and ‘Madden 27’Here’s your first look at ‘College Football 27’ and ‘Madden 27’
College Football

Mascot game! Tush push!

By James Dator
NFL
Brendan Sorsby’s gambling allegations could end his college football career. Is NFL Supplemental Draft next?Brendan Sorsby’s gambling allegations could end his college football career. Is NFL Supplemental Draft next?
NFL

Brendan Sorsby calls out NCAA hypocrisy as his football future is uncertain

By Mark Schofield
College Football
NAACP urges black athletes to reject recruiting in racially gerrymandered statesNAACP urges black athletes to reject recruiting in racially gerrymandered states
College Football

The NAACP is asking athletes to take up the fight for voting rights.

By James Dator
College Football
Oregon coach asks recruits about their favorite ice cream, and it actually makes senseOregon coach asks recruits about their favorite ice cream, and it actually makes sense
College Football

Oregon coaches have a strange question for potential recruits.

By Mark Schofield