MODERN HISTORY: The New Browns (1999-Present), aka The Lost Years or The Dark Ages
Welcome to the second part of our crash course, Johnny. First things first ... this part of the class needs to have a trigger warning. A trigger warning is a disclaimer that alerts readers, or in your case a student, that we're venturing into potentially traumatic subject matters. So, FYI ... be prepared. This is not going to be pretty.
we're venturing into potentially traumatic subject matters. So, FYI ... be prepared. This is not going to be pretty.

This is an important era. These are the Browns you have been anointed to save. The New Browns (the old ones are currently playing in Baltimore as the Ravens, but I'm sure you knew that. Wait. You knew that, right?) have now drafted eight quarterbacks (including yourself) dating back to 1999. Four of you were picked in the first round (three of you were picked with the 22nd pick in the draft!!!). Two of your brethren were chosen in the third round, one in the fourth and one in the sixth.
Now, history is important Johnny, because if you don't know it, you'll be doomed to repeat it. But these seven quarterbacks did not have a great go of it in Cleveland. I know you've said you're eager to compete with Brian Hoyer for the starting job, and that's all well and good, but we're here to tell you right now that even if you lose that competition, you will end up starting a significant number of games. In fact, the only quarterback the Browns have drafted in the last 15 years who didn't get a start in his rookie season was Brady Quinn, and he was named the starter at the beginning of his second season, so it's just a matter of time.
Pretty much all you have to do, Johnny, for this part of the course, is study this average trajectory for a Cleveland Browns-drafted quarterback, post-1999. Study it. Learn it. Because you will most likely live it.
Trajectory
You will come into camp as the clear-cut backup quarterback based on the fact that Brian Hoyer played three good games last year before being hurt and being lost for the season, three games the Browns won after starting 0-2.
Hoyer will struggle. It might not be in the first game or the second game, but he will struggle, and by about the sixth or seventh game, the headlines will shift from "Manziel needs to watch and learn" to "Start Johnny Football: What have we got to lose?"
It's important to consider Charlie Frye here. In 2005, Frye, a rookie from Akron and third-round draft pick, won the backup job in training camp, beating out Doug Johnson. This meant he would be able to stand on the sidelines and learn from Trent Dilfer. In one month, the headlines in The Plain Dealer went from "(Romeo) Crennel in no hurry to get Frey seasoned" (just an aside ... do you get that joke, Johnny? I'm sure the headline writers will come up with some word-play based on your name, too) to "Change could happen: Offensive starters under scrutiny, including Dilfer." That was from September to October. One week after that latter headline came this one: "As offense is grilled, is it time for Frye?" Then, by December, it was "Dilfer limping, so heat turns up on Frye" (all the cooking word play!).
Fans wanted Frye, too, by December:
"He definitely showed the intangibles people have been talking about with his pocket presence and ability to make something out of nothing," said stevenmiller.mac@mac.com in The Plain Dealer.
"I cannot understand why Crennel will not name Frye the starter for the rest of the season. Frye proved that he could succeed with his ‘moxie' despite playing behind an average offensive line (due to injuries) against a great defense," said KrizanskyJP@yahoo.com.
"It's definitely time for the Charlie Frye Era," said Rcummings675@aol.com.
The Charlie Frye Era! How long until we're talking the "Johnny Manziel Era?" Actually, this would make a great online discussion topic, OK Johnny?
Eventually, Hoyer will have a game in which he will be so horribly bad that head coach Mike Pettine will give in and say he's going to try and get you some playing time. That will morph into your being named the starter, all within the span of two to five days.
If you're lucky, as in Colt McCoy lucky, you'll have a couple decent games. McCoy's first start came against the Steelers in October 2010. The Browns lost 28-10, but the headline the next day was "Lose a game, but gain a QB: Rookie McCoy wins respect in his first start." That's because he completed 23 passes in 33 attempts for 281 yards and one touchdown. He also threw two interceptions. The next week, McCoy led the Browns on the road against the defending Super Bowl champion New Orleans Saints, and beat them 30-17. Of course, McCoy threw for just 74 yards, but hey, the Browns won!
That's a lucky start. For an example of an unlucky start, let's look at Spergon Wynn. He came to Cleveland by way of Southwest Texas State University, picked in the sixth round of the 2000 Draft.
Wynn had what was at times described by newspaper reporters as a "cannon" or "bionic" arm. He was compared to John Elway. He threw the ball 81 yards in the air at the NFL Draft Combine, which explains how a guy who completed less than 50 percent of his passes at a Division I-AA school his senior year could be picked in the sixth round, ahead of Tom Brady.
Wynn started exactly one game before getting hurt. It would be his only NFL start. It came against the Jacksonville Jaguars, and, well, the numbers tell you all you need to know. The Browns lost 48-0, and Wynn completed 5 of 16 passes for 17 yards, or 64 yards less than that one pass he threw at the Combine. He was sacked five times for minus-35 yards. He literally went backwards for an entire game.
So you will start, and maybe you'll be lucky and after a couple games, the headlines will gush.

So you will start, and maybe you'll be lucky and after a couple games, the headlines will gush. They'll say you're the "real deal." They'll say you're going to "save the franchise," that you're "the quarterback of the future." The stories will say it doesn't really matter how tall you are, or that your arm isn't strong enough. It doesn't matter that you refuse to watch game film or would rather party than learn the playbook, because you've got intangibles, and that's really what all these other quarterbacks clearly lacked.
But you'll get sacked. A lot. You won't have your best receiver because he'll either be in drug rehab or prison. And you'll find out that Ben Tate isn't really the answer to a solid running game in the NFL. So it doesn't matter how good the offensive line is. You'll spend a lot of time on your back. Which will make you start throwing really stupid and dangerous passes. Some of them will be picked off and returned for touchdowns. The Browns will lose, three, four, maybe five straight games. You'll start complaining about the play-calling. You'll say your receivers run bad routes. You'll say something about Josh Gordon. You'll say you need a running back. You'll say a lot that you will be forced to apologize for. You'll apologize for hanging out with Bieber. In the final week of the season, you'll get crushed by a linebacker from the Ravens (remember them? The Old Browns), and that will, mercifully, call an end to your season.
Your Browns will win somewhere between four and six games. Pettine won't commit to you as the starter for 2015. After all, Hoyer probably signed a contract extension before the previous season started. Five years. FIVE YEARS! And Hoyer probably rallied the Browns to a come-from-behind victory against the Ravens after you were injured.
Maybe you'll start some in 2015. Maybe you'll win a few. Maybe you'll even beat the Steelers. I mean, Tim Couch did (more on him in a moment!). Three times.
In exactly two and a half years, you'll be traded to another team for a sixth-round pick. It will most definitely be a sixth-round pick. That is what a Browns first or third-round pick is worth two years later. You will have ultimately started about 19 (Bernie Kosar's number!) games for the Browns. You will have won six and lost 13. You will have thrown more interceptions than touchdowns. Your quarterback rating will be in the 50s. The following season, you'll be a backup somewhere, maybe in Dallas or Green Bay or Washington or Minnesota. Who knows? Nobody will really care, because by then, the Browns will have drafted some kid who, right this very second, is sitting in a high school classroom, anxiously waiting for Friday night, so he can lead his team to victory. This kid will have spent two or three years in college playing football, racking up passing yardage and touchdowns and maybe even a Heisman. He will be the savior of the football franchise, and so the cycle will continue.
But enough with this depressing talk. We told you at the start this section could be traumatic. Now it's time for your assignment.
Write a 1,000-word paper on why the Cleveland Browns seemingly continue to make the same mistakes over and over and over again with rookie quarterbacks. Consider the career of Tim Couch (case study included below) as a blueprint for how the Browns have handled their rookie quarterbacks, and try to ascertain how eight different head coaches, six general managers and two ownership groups all followed the same blueprint, despite the fact it has never worked.
Once you complete this assignment, you may move on to the next section of the course.
Case Study: Tim Couch

Tim Couch is the one Cleveland Browns-drafted quarterback who had almost (although not quite) as much hype attached to him as you, Johnny. Couch was the No. 1 overall pick in the 1999 Draft. He left Kentucky at the end of his junior year. He had thrown 73 touchdowns in his two years as the starter at UK (that's 10 more than you). The Browns were an expansion team, which meant they were pretty bad. No offensive line. No running game. No wide receivers. No defense. A first-time coach. It was a recipe for disaster.
Couch was supposed to sit for at least the first three weeks behind veteran Ty Detmer. Then the coaching staff would reevaluate the QB position. Then the Steelers bum-rushed the Browns and knocked them all, coach's included, a little silly, in the season opener. Couch came into the game in the third quarter and threw an interception on his first-ever pass. So of course, he was named the starter for Week 2.
"We were a bad football team," Couch says. "It was a tough situation to be in. I didn't handle the situation well. I didn't understand what it was like to not go out and throw four touchdowns. I lost a lot of confidence in those first couple of years. I wasn't playing up to expectations. I was just dealing with adversity. Those first couple of years were a pretty tough road for me."
Couch started on and off for four years for the Browns, mostly because he was injured a lot. He was injured a lot because the Browns had a horrible offensive line and a pretty offensive running game, too. So teams just blitzed the hell out of Couch. In his second season, the Browns won seven games. Then, the next year, he helped lead the team to nine wins and the playoffs, but broke his leg in the final game of the season.
He started 2003 as the backup to Kelly Holcomb, then became starter when Holcomb was injured. Then he was hurt again. Then Holcomb sucked and Couch was back in. And yet, Couch was jettisoned by Butch Davis the following July. He signed with the Packers to be a backup to Brett Favre, but never saw the field.
Couch is now a college football analyst for Fox Sports South, covering SEC games. He even called a couple of your games, Johnny, and he thinks you have the best chance out of all the Cleveland Browns drafted quarterbacks to succeed, namely because you have a better team around you than he ever had.
Couch's record as a starting quarterback in those four years was 22-37. That's six more wins than any other quarterback has won for the Browns since 1999, and 16 more than any Browns draft pick has won.
Conclusion? The bar is not set real high.