Skip to main content
Come Fan with UsTuesday, August 4, 2026

The Red Sox are relentless

Sunday’s Say Hey, Baseball look at the big Game Four comeback for the Red Sox before looking ahead to Game Five.

If you buy something from a link, Vox Media may earn a commission. See our ethics statement.

Let’s set the stage. The Red Sox, after winning the first two games of the World Series, were riding high heading out west. Then, they lost a devastating Game Three in which they had a chance to win in extras but were destroyed by an error. The Dodgers outlasted them, and after 18 innings they had a massive lift while Boston dealt with a massive letdown. Then, they came out in Game Four and were completely lost at the plate. Rich Hill owned them in every way, shape and form and after Yasiel Puig’s three-run shot this series looked destined for a 2-2 tie.

Except, well, this Red Sox team is relentless and games are not over until they are over. This is a team that thrived against opposing bullpens all year, even as organizations are pouring more and more resources into their relief. They’ve come back so many times this year and were easily the best offense in baseball in the final third of games all season long. That was on full display in Game Four, and they relied on their role players and bullpen -- as they’ve done all postseason -- to come back and end up with a five-run lead heading into the bottom of the night.

It doesn’t seem possible, and as late as 11:00 PM ET Saturday night it looked like the Dodgers had all the momentum in this series. Now, as we wake up on Sunday, the Red Sox have a chance to win the whole thing later on tonight. Granted, the Dodgers are incredibly talented and have the best pitcher in a generation taking the mound in Game Five. This isn’t over until it’s over. That said, the Red Sox don’t have the look of a team that is going to get complacent, and they showed once again in Game Four that they are never to be counted out.

Read the Red Sox perspective of Game Five here, and the Dodgers perspective here.

See More: