Skip to main content
Come Fan with UsTuesday, August 4, 2026

Peru and Morocco played beautiful soccer, and the World Cup punished them for it

When it comes to sport, beauty can only ever be the means, not the end.

If there is a lesson to be learned from the first few eliminations of this World Cup, it is a bleak one. Russia 2018 does not care for your pretty football. Peru and Morocco have both spent two games weaving delightful patterns between both boxes, but haven’t actually managed to score any goals. As such, they’re going home.

For those that have accepted their inner Galeano — the beggars for good soccer, hands outstretched, pleading for a pretty move — this is serious gutpunch. Apart from anything else, it’s a tragedy of scarcity. This World Cup will be made up of 64 games, but Peru and Morocco will only be involved in a paltry six. And two of those will be meaningless, at least for our beautiful beaten boys.

Portugal v Morocco: Group B - 2018 FIFA World Cup Russia
Photo by Maddie Meyer/Getty Images

There is a tension in the search for prettiness. When it comes to sport, beauty can only ever be the means, not the end. Pretty football that doesn’t win gets teams knocked out. It gets players dropped and managers sacked. And the approach of most of the smaller nations at the World Cup has been diametrically opposed to that of Peru and Morocco: sit deep, defend, see what can be nicked on the break.

This is entirely understandable and almost certainly correct. Prettiness means attacking, broadly speaking; attacking means risk. But that the prettiness is simply collateral damage doesn’t make its absence any less frustrating. Or the games any more exciting. So far, Russia hasn’t had too many truly awful games, but a diet of careful organisation can get a little bland.

There are many paths to winning, of course, and national teams in particular are constrained by whoever they have in their talent pool. And it’s important to remember that Peru and Morocco play their pretty football not to indulge themselves, much less the prettiness beggars, but because it works — it got them to the World Cup, for the first time in 36 and 20 years, respectively.

Related

Still, it couldn’t get them any further. The details of their eliminations are different — If only Christian Cueva could take a penalty! If only Morocco had a striker! — but there is a shared theme. Theirs was a different, distinct approach to the problem of trying to win a game of football, one predicated on maximizing themselves rather than minimizing their opposition.

And now the tournament is a less interesting place, and all the world’s beggars are going home empty-handed. Well, at least until Mexico’s next game. Or Senegal’s. Or Christian Eriksen’s. Or Paul Pog— you know, that’s the thing about begging for prettiness. There’s always hope. Hands out. We go again.

See More:

More in Soccer

Soccer
FIFA president aims to sell the World Cup to Trump family associatesFIFA president aims to sell the World Cup to Trump family associates
Soccer

This would completely change world soccer.

By James Dator
Soccer
The FIFA World Cup halftime show was so unhinged you need to see it to believe itThe FIFA World Cup halftime show was so unhinged you need to see it to believe it
Soccer
World Cup 2026: Golden Boot scenarios for Kylian Mbappé and Lionel MessiWorld Cup 2026: Golden Boot scenarios for Kylian Mbappé and Lionel Messi
Soccer

The race for the Golden Boot comes down to the World Cup Final

By Mark Schofield
Soccer
2026 World Cup Golden Boot: Most goals, standings2026 World Cup Golden Boot: Most goals, standings
Soccer

Tracking the top scorers in North America this summer looking to make history.

By Mark Schofield
Soccer
World Cup Final instant prediction for Spain vs. ArgentinaWorld Cup Final instant prediction for Spain vs. Argentina
Soccer

Preview and prediction for Argentina vs. Spain in the 2026 World Cup final.

By James Dator and Mark Schofield