Skip to main content
Come Fan with UsFriday, June 19, 2026

Why Barcelona only got fined €300 for tapping up Antoine Griezmann

Atlético Madrid played itself.

FBL-ESP-LIGA-ATLETICO-TRAINING
FBL-ESP-LIGA-ATLETICO-TRAINING
Photo credit should read JAVIER SORIANO/AFP/Getty Images

Wednesday brought a ruling that FC Barcelona fans had been dreading — the club was found to have illegally negotiated with Antoine Griezmann before paying his release clause to Atlético Madrid. Finally, justice for Atléti. The punishment? €300.

That’s not a typo. Seriously, €300. The Royal Spanish Football Federation seems well aware how ridiculous this sounds, admitting that it’s not any kind of punishment at all.

“This committee is aware that the payment of €300, beyond its purely symbolic gesture, will not contribute to the club being punished in this case and probably other clubs that may be in this situation in the future, to fit their conduct within the required rules.”

Hilariously, Barcelona will appeal the ruling, because it feels that paying the fine would amount to an admission of wrongdoing.

RFEF’s argument for imposing such a small punishment against Barca is essentially that Atléti admitted Griezmann would be leaving the club well ahead of the transfer window. On May 14, the club posted this video, confirming Griezmann would not be an Atléti player the following season.

“It is important to highlight that the contacts between FC Barcelona occurred once the player had manifested his intention to leave Atlético Madrid,” RFEF said in their statement. Basically: Yeah, Barca contacted Griezmann before depositing his buyout clause, but only after Atlético Madrid itself announced his imminent departure.

Atléti also played itself with Griezmann’s release clause. Griezmann’s contract had a €200 million release clause last season, but it dropped to €120m on July 1, which is when Barcelona paid it. Atléti argued that, because Barcelona started talking to Griezmann before July 1, the Catalan club should have to pay the €80 million difference. The judge who ruled on the case disagreed.

Barcelona broke the rules, and it’s very difficult to believe they had never contacted Griezmann’s representatives before May 14. But Atléti can’t prove that, and it gave Barcelona an excuse when it made an unprompted, unorthodox announcement that a player it hadn’t agreed to sell was going to leave the club. It also let Barca get him cheap by writing the release clause in his contract the way it did.

Atléti played itself. Hopefully club leadership has learned how to not play itself in the future.

More in Soccer

Soccer
World Cup 2026 bracket: Who has advanced to the knockout round?World Cup 2026 bracket: Who has advanced to the knockout round?
Soccer

What teams have advanced to the knockout round at the World Cup?

By Mark Schofield
Soccer
World Cup 2026: Group B advancement scenarios for Canada and othersWorld Cup 2026: Group B advancement scenarios for Canada and others
Soccer

Can Canada make it out of Group B at the World Cup?

By Mark Schofield
Soccer
2026 World Cup Golden Boot: Most goals, standings2026 World Cup Golden Boot: Most goals, standings
Soccer

Tracking the top scorers in North America this summer looking to make history.

By Mark Schofield
Soccer
World Cup 2026: Third-place standings, tiebreakers explainedWorld Cup 2026: Third-place standings, tiebreakers explained
Soccer
How David Beckham changed MLS foreverHow David Beckham changed MLS forever
Play
Soccer
5 things we learned in the first week of the FIFA World Cup5 things we learned in the first week of the FIFA World Cup
Soccer

From superstar performances to the United States’ dominance, here is what caught our eye so far.

By Bernd Buchmasser