Skip to main content
Come Fan with UsTuesday, August 4, 2026

NCAA obliterated 9-0 by Supreme Court of the United States

The NCAA suffered a HUGE loss Monday.

Supreme Court Releases Opinions
Supreme Court Releases Opinions
Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images
James Dator
James Dator has been covering a wide range of sports for SB Nation for over a decade, with a special focus on the NFL.

The NCAA got handed a mammoth loss Monday when all nine Supreme Court justices sided with former college players in an ongoing dispute about player compensations.

Justices on both sides of the aisle, who rarely agree to anything, were unanimous on one core issue: The NCAA sucks and the system is broken. In his concurring opinion on the decision Justice Kavanaugh wrote the following:

“Traditions alone cannot justify the NCAA’s decision to build a massive money-raising enterprise on the backs of student athletes who are not fairly compensated. Nowhere else in America can businesses get away with agreeing not to pay their workers a fair market rate on the theory that their product is defined by not paying their workers a fair market rate.”

In closing he added “the NCAA is not above the law.” It was a harder-line opinion than that of Justice Gorsuch, who wrote on behalf of the court, but the result is the same: The NCAA as we know it will be forced to change.

It’s unclear what that system looks like at this time. There is virtually no way the NCAA can move past the SCOTUS ruling with “business as usual.” Players will have to be compensated beyond the paltry stipends and scholarships the NCAA has used for 115 year as a way to avoid paying players.

The decision could have wide-ranging results not just inside of collegiate athletics, but amateurism in sports as a whole. The NCAA attempted to walk back their adherence to not paying athletes in 2019 by allowing for likeness rights to be sold, but as Alex Kirshner for Slate pointed out, the NCAA were firmly against players making money from their talent.

That is the association’s ultimate fear, as the NCAA has made clear many times. As it said when announcing in 2019 that it would consider changes to rules governing name, image, and likeness payments, the NCAA “will not consider any concepts that could be construed as payment for participation in college sports,” lest it ever lead to “any contemplation of pay-for-play.”

That ultimate fear has now been realized. Things will change, and college athletics won’t be the same. It’s about time.

College Football
College football rankings: Preseason top-25 teams, according to usCollege football rankings: Preseason top-25 teams, according to us
College Football

Here’s our top-25 teams in college football.

By Mark Schofield
NFL Draft beat
How NFL-ready is Arch Manning?How NFL-ready is Arch Manning?
NFL Draft beat

Arch Manning is the presumptive QB1 in the 2027 draft class that’s supposed to be generational. What does he need to improve in order to make that a reality?

By Doug Farrar
College Football
College Football 27 review: The greatest meal that leaves a bad taste in your mouthCollege Football 27 review: The greatest meal that leaves a bad taste in your mouth
College Football

Brilliant in so many ways, flawed in one key area.

By James Dator
NFL
Brendan Sorsby stuck as NFL announces NO Supplemental Draft in 2026Brendan Sorsby stuck as NFL announces NO Supplemental Draft in 2026
NFL

Another setback for the QB.

By James Dator
College Football
The NCAA can appeal Brendan Sorsby’s shocking reinstatement, but Texas law isn’t on their sideThe NCAA can appeal Brendan Sorsby’s shocking reinstatement, but Texas law isn’t on their side
College Football

A big can of worms has been opened in college sports

By Mark Schofield
College Football
Here’s your first look at ‘College Football 27’ and ‘Madden 27’Here’s your first look at ‘College Football 27’ and ‘Madden 27’
College Football

Mascot game! Tush push!

By James Dator