Skip to main content
Come Fan with UsSaturday, June 20, 2026

2016 Armed Forces Bowl stats preview: Navy vs. Louisiana Tech advanced tale of the tape

Louisiana Tech Bulldogs (8-5) vs. Navy Midshipmen (9-3)

December 23, 2016 ( 4:30 PM ET, ESPN )
Spread: Louisiana Tech -4.5
S&P+ Projection: Louisiana Tech (39.5-34.2)

Confused? Check out the advanced-stats glossary here.
Statistical profiles index.
Full Football Outsiders F/+ rankings can be found here.

The Basics
Category Louisiana Tech Navy
S&P+ (Rk) 51 60
Category Louisiana Tech offense Navy defense Navy offense Louisiana Tech defense
Yards per play (Rk) 7.30 (1) 6.06 (110) 6.77 (9) 5.49 (66)
Yards per game (Rk) 520.0 (6) 423.6 (73) 462.8 (32) 416.5 (69)
Points per possession (Rk) 3.62 (2) 2.90 (119) 3.61 (3) 2.62 (103)
Category Louisiana Tech offense Navy defense Navy offense Louisiana Tech defense
S&P+ (Rk) 40.0 (8) 36.4 (110) 36.2 (25) 34.9 (103)
Rushing S&P+ (Rk) 113.8 (30) 101.4 (61) 134.5 (3) 99.7 (67)
Passing S&P+ (Rk) 115.8 (30) 83.3 (121) 129.9 (9) 90.2 (106)
Standard Downs S&P+ (Rk) 115.3 (19) 93.1 (99) 115.0 (20) 97.3 (77)
Passing Downs S&P+ (Rk) 119.8 (21) 85.1 (114) 149.3 (2) 94.2 (91)
Q1 S&P+ (Rk) 129.7 (14) 85.5 (117) 120.2 (26) 99.4 (69)
Q2 S&P+ (Rk) 120.4 (21) 99.2 (75) 128.2 (6) 100.4 (69)
Q3 S&P+ (Rk) 109.1 (45) 88.4 (112) 140.5 (3) 102.1 (55)
Q4 S&P+ (Rk) 120.2 (11) 88.4 (111) 118.5 (12) 84.7 (119)
Five biggest advantages* (according to the advanced stats)

* or smallest disadvantages

Louisiana Tech

  1. Passing Efficiency (Success Rate) (No. 10 offense vs. No. 120 defense)
  2. Adj. Sack Rate (No. 20 offense vs. No. 119 defense)
  3. Passing Downs Sack Rate (No. 17 defense vs. No. 113 offense)
  4. Second Down S&P+ (No. 9 offense vs. No. 104 defense)
  5. Passing Downs S&P+ (No. 21 offense vs. No. 114 defense)

Navy

  1. Redzone S&P+ (No. 4 offense vs. No. 114 defense)
  2. Rushing Efficiency (Success Rate) (No. 3 offense vs. No. 113 defense)
  3. Standard Downs Efficiency (Success Rate) (No. 7 offense vs. No. 114 defense)
  4. Efficiency (Success Rate) (No. 6 offense vs. No. 113 defense)
  5. Adj. Line Yards (No. 2 offense vs. No. 101 defense)
Five Factors
Category Louisiana Tech offense Navy defense Navy offense Louisiana Tech defense
EXPLOSIVENESS 1.34 (32) 1.32 (102) 1.25 (73) 1.16 (17)
EFFICIENCY 52.2% (3) 45.8% (108) 50.7% (7) 47.6% (116)
FIELD POSITION 30.1 (55) 27.6 (28) 30.9 (38) 28.9 (62)
FINISHING DRIVES 5.2 (12) 4.7 (87) 5.3 (9) 5.2 (119)
TURNOVER MARGIN EXPECTED:
Louisiana Tech -2.64 (89)
Navy 6.45 (15)
ACTUAL
Louisiana Tech 1 (56)
Navy 1 (56)
Offensive Footprint
Category (Rk) Louisiana Tech offense Navy offense
Adj. Pace -5.5 (109) -0.1 (64)
Plays per game 71.2 (86) 68.3 (114)
Possessions per game 12.2 (115) 10.8 (128)
Std. Downs Run Rate 44.2% (125) 87.8% (3)
Pass. Downs Run Rate 19.6% (125) 69.5% (2)
% of solo tackles 71.3% (96) 74.1% (59)
Defensive Footprint
Category (Rk) Louisiana Tech defense Navy defense
Std. Downs Run Rate 55.2% (108) 58.4% (80)
Pass. Downs Run Rate 28.0% (117) 38.9% (22)
Overall Havoc Rate 15.6% (65) 13.5% (102)
Front 7 Havoc Rate 7.5% (103) 7.9% (91)
DB Havoc Rate 7.9% (24) 5.6% (91)
PD to INC 33.1% (63) 34.6% (52)

When Louisiana Tech has the ball…

Standard Downs
Louisiana Tech Offense Navy Defense
Avg. Rk Avg. Rk Edge
Standard Downs S&P+ 115.3 19 93.1 99 Louisiana Tech big
Standard Downs Success Rate 56.2 4 50.4 101 Louisiana Tech big
Standard Downs IsoPPP 1.25 19 1.04 91 Louisiana Tech big
SD Line Yards per Carry 3.33 18 3.10 86 Louisiana Tech big
SD Sack Rate 3.8% 40 4.1% 82 Louisiana Tech
Passing Downs
Louisiana Tech Offense Navy Defense
Avg. Rk Avg. Rk Edge
Passing Downs S&P+ 119.8 21 85.1 114 Louisiana Tech big
Passing Downs Success Rate 41.2 6 35.1 109 Louisiana Tech big
Passing Downs IsoPPP 1.71 76 1.61 103 Louisiana Tech
PD Line Yards per Carry 3.44 48 2.71 26 Navy
PD Sack Rate 5.8% 34 3.2% 123 Louisiana Tech big

When Navy has the ball…

Standard Downs
Navy Offense Louisiana Tech Defense
Avg. Rk Avg. Rk Edge
Standard Downs S&P+ 115.0 20 97.3 77 Navy big
Standard Downs Success Rate 53.7 11 51.6 111 Navy big
Standard Downs IsoPPP 1.08 82 1.16 35 Louisiana Tech
SD Line Yards per Carry 3.38 13 3.11 87 Navy big
SD Sack Rate 11.7% 127 4.6% 71 Louisiana Tech big
Passing Downs
Navy Offense Louisiana Tech Defense
Avg. Rk Avg. Rk Edge
Passing Downs S&P+ 149.3 2 94.2 91 Navy big
Passing Downs Success Rate 41.1 7 37.0 122 Navy big
Passing Downs IsoPPP 1.97 15 1.84 21
PD Line Yards per Carry 3.99 13 2.62 20
PD Sack Rate 10.9% 113 10.4% 17 Louisiana Tech big

Stats via SportSource Analytics

College Football
The NCAA can appeal Brendan Sorsby’s shocking reinstatement, but Texas law isn’t on their sideThe NCAA can appeal Brendan Sorsby’s shocking reinstatement, but Texas law isn’t on their side
College Football

A big can of worms has been opened in college sports

By Mark Schofield
College Football
Here’s your first look at ‘College Football 27’ and ‘Madden 27’Here’s your first look at ‘College Football 27’ and ‘Madden 27’
College Football

Mascot game! Tush push!

By James Dator
NFL
Brendan Sorsby’s gambling allegations could end his college football career. Is NFL Supplemental Draft next?Brendan Sorsby’s gambling allegations could end his college football career. Is NFL Supplemental Draft next?
NFL

Brendan Sorsby calls out NCAA hypocrisy as his football future is uncertain

By Mark Schofield
College Football
NAACP urges black athletes to reject recruiting in racially gerrymandered statesNAACP urges black athletes to reject recruiting in racially gerrymandered states
College Football

The NAACP is asking athletes to take up the fight for voting rights.

By James Dator
College Football
Oregon coach asks recruits about their favorite ice cream, and it actually makes senseOregon coach asks recruits about their favorite ice cream, and it actually makes sense
College Football

Oregon coaches have a strange question for potential recruits.

By Mark Schofield
NFL
Why Jeremiyah Love brings top-5 value to NFL Draft as a RBWhy Jeremiyah Love brings top-5 value to NFL Draft as a RB
NFL

The Notre Dame star is the rare running back worth a top-10 or even top-5 pick.

By Mark Schofield