Here are your college football team’s odds of going winless, bowling, or undefeated-ish

Each year since 2015, I’ve been sharing team statistical profiles with as much data-dump goodness as possible. For three years, the profiles were at Football Study Hall, but I switched up the format this year, setting them up in a Google Doc for easier toggling. You can find goodies for all 130 FBS teams here.

This week, I began including two extra pieces of information: a team’s week-to-week S&P+ ranking progression and its odds of finishing with a given record. Let’s focus on the latter for a moment.

Your 10 most likely teams to finish with between zero and two wins (if they are currently winless, their odds of finishing winless are in parentheses):

It was obvious from the start that there was a chance for a Year Zero situation for two members of the Chip Kelly tree: Nebraska’s Scott Frost, and, well, UCLA’s Chip Kelly. The two boasted a combined 65-14 college record heading into 2018. It’s now a combined 65-20. And odds are, it could get worse.

Post-game win expectancy is a measure I created that looks at the most important, predictive stats from a game and says “You could have expected to win this game X percent of the time.” Nebraska probably should have beaten Colorado (post-game win expectancy: 94 percent!) and Troy (54 percent) and therefore only sits at 72nd in S&P+ despite last week’s humiliating loss to Michigan.

With Illinois currently ranked 102nd and three remaining foes ranked between 46th and 65th, the Huskers should be able to snag two or three wins.

UCLA, on the other hand, ranks a little bit lower — 81st — and doesn’t have dead weight on the slate. No remaining opponent ranks worse than 68th, and the two lowest-ranked (Arizona State and Cal) host the Bruins. Odds say they’ll find a win or two, but there’s about a one-in-nine chance they don’t. Only UTEP and SJSU have higher winless odds.

My goodness, UTEP.

Last season, NMSU made a bowl for the first time in 57 seasons. In my belief that every fan base should be happy occasionally, I adopted the Aggies last season, keeping close tabs on their bowl progress. It became maybe my favorite plot of 2017.

Who is this year’s NMSU, or EMU (2016), or ULM (2012)? Here are some of the more interesting teams fighting for six wins:

A month in, only seven teams have a 0 percent chance of six wins.

Here are the 14 power conference teams with at least a 9 percent chance of finishing with zero/one losses (not including conference title games). If they’re still unbeaten, their chances of finishing the regular season without a blemish are in parentheses.

The top of this list is extraordinarily predictable. But then things get weird.

Following Saturday’s 28-7 win over Mississippi State, the Wildcats and their seventh-ranked defense (per Def. S&P+) are favored in all but one remaining game: their Nov. 3 battle with Georgia in Lexington.

There are plenty of tossups along the way, too — South Carolina (win probability: 62 percent), at Texas A&M (51 percent), at Missouri (57 percent) — so even if they were to upset the Dawgs, they probably wouldn’t reach 12-0. But they’ve basically got 50-50 odds of finishing 10-2 or better.

AND THEY’RE KENTUCKY. The Wildcats have won double-digit games just twice in their history: 1950 (11-1 under Bear Bryant) and 1977 (10-1 under Fran Curci, a season played under a bowl ban).

Here are your eight Group of 5 teams with at least a 10 percent chance of finishing with zero to one losses (again, not including conference title games).

A lot of old reliables mixed in with some new surprises.

First, it was easy to assume UNT would be pretty good this year, but this good? The Mean Green have won every game by at least 23 points and are up to 44th in S&P+ despite still being weighed down by preseason projections, and they are favored by at least 10 points in every remaining regular season game, including the Nov. 15 battle against FAU.

If UNT finishes 13-0, who would get your NY6 vote: the Mean Green or, say, an 11-1 UCF?

Another couple of teams we should give shouts out to at the moment: Buffalo and Cincinnati.

Lance Leipold came to UB having gone 109-6 at Division III’s UW-Whitewater. He then went 7-17 — nearly three times as many losses as UWW! — in his first two seasons in Buffalo.

Last year, the Bulls went 6-6, and they uncovered one of the nation’s better pass-catch combos in Tyree Jackson to Anthony Johnson. And so far in 2018, Johnson has one hell of a battery mate in K.J. Osborn: the two have combined for 37 catches, 636 yards, and eight touchdowns.

Buffalo is 4-0 with road wins over Temple (by a little) and Rutgers (by a lot), plus a key MAC win over EMU. The Bulls are slight underdogs at Toledo on Oct. 20 but otherwise projected to win every remaining game by at least 13.9 points. The Bulls could get Army’d this weekend, but this is shaping up to be the historic season UB fans had to hope for when Leipold came aboard.

Cincinnati, meanwhile, is a year ahead. Second-year head coach Luke Fickell has been kicking butt in recruiting, but I figured it wouldn’t be until 2019 when that really began paying off. It appears I was incorrect. Projected 89th in S&P+, the Bearcats are 4-0 and up to 63rd, and while there are tricky games left — at Temple, at UCF, USF at home, etc. — it’s clear that at worst they’ll be bowling for the first time in four seasons.

That Alabama and Clemson each almost has a coin flip’s chance of finishing unbeaten, and it’s still September, is pretty nuts.

But remember how odds work. There’s only about an 18 percent chance that they both reach 12-0, and there’s only a 4 percent chance that Bama, Clemson, and Ohio State all finish unbeaten. Hell, there’s only a 41 percent chance they all finish with zero/one losses, 24 percent if you add Georgia to that mix.

With the dominance of this year’s top four or five teams, it’s easy to assume we know how everything is going to play out. But the dice have a mind of their own, and there’s a 76 percent chance that one of our obvious top four teams doesn’t finish 11-1 or better.