Virginia could be one of the surer things in the 2019 ACC

Bill C’s annual preview series of every FBS team in college football continues. Catch up here!

As a pure thought experiment, Virginia’s hire of Bronco Mendenhall was one of my favorites of the 2015-16 coaching carousel.

He had the résumé for a major conference gig, having been a successful defensive coordinator for seven years before winning 99 games in 11 seasons as BYU’s head coach, and he was somehow only 49 years old. He had navigated BYU through its tricky transition to independence and beaten Nebraska, Boise State, Ole Miss, Virginia, Georgia Tech, Washington State, Oregon State, and Texas. Plus, he had gotten used to the always-fraught game of BYU roster balance, in which a healthy percentage of your signing class in a given year won’t show up on campus until after a two-year LDS mission. He had brought stability to a tricky job.

However, his 1997 season as Louisiana Tech’s DBs coach was the only one he had ever spent east of Mountain Standard Time. He would be recruiting and coaching kids from a completely different part of the country, doing so amid strong competition — Clemson’s Dabo Swinney had just found fifth gear, Florida State’s Jimbo Fisher was still dominant, Miami had just hired Mark Richt, Syracuse had just hired Dino Babers, and Virginia Tech had just hired Justin Fuente.

Exactly what would happen when you placed a Western coach (and a lot of his assistants) in eastern Virginia? Would they be able to develop the recruiting connections? Would coaching experience trump geography and tougher competition?

We’re starting to get a pretty good idea of the answers.

After stripping the house down to the foundation, Mendenhall fielded Virginia’s best team per S&P+ since 2004 ... in just his third season in Charlottesville. And he did it, above all else, with development.

The Cavaliers were on the precipice of a 10-win season until unlucky losses to Georgia Tech and Virginia Tech. They rebounded to pummel South Carolina in the Belk Bowl, then signed by far Mendenhall’s best class yet (34th overall, seventh in the ACC).

If he can turn mid-three-star guys into all-conference performers, what happens now that he’s landing high-threes? Mendenhall made waves by saying UVA had only 27 ACC-level players this time last year, but what happens when he thinks the Hoos have, like, 40?

Granted, there remain plenty of hurdles. The offense was more efficient than it had been in a while but almost totally lacked in explosiveness and easy scores, and that was with Zaccheaus and Ellis. The defense, strong overall (31st in Def. S&P+), gave up a few too many big run plays and now has to replace Thornhill and Peace.

Plus, for all the developmental success, the Hoos still only went 8-5 last year. They failed to capitalize on an ACC that had suddenly fallen apart. They lost three games by four or fewer points. They had Virginia Tech all but beaten, poised to end a 14-year losing streak to their rivals, but Tech recovered two late fumbles (one in the end zone for a TD, and one on the final play of the game in OT) to steal the win. And the best UVA team in more than a decade failed to beat Georgia Tech, Pitt, or Indiana.

UVA is projected to improve slightly this fall, but the ACC isn’t going to stay down forever, and road trips to Pitt, Notre Dame, and Miami could make it hard to get as close to the Coastal Division crown as they got last year. There’s reason for extreme optimism in C’ville, but there’s also reason to worry about a closing window.

It’s rare that you both break in a new starting quarterback and improve dramatically at the same time, but UVA pulled it off last season.

The Cavaliers rose from 91st to 62nd in Off. S&P+ and proved remarkably efficient, ranking 30th in marginal efficiency. Unfortunately, they were 81st in marginal explosiveness. Without easy scores, you need to finish drives really well, and they did not — they were 74th in points per scoring opportunity (first downs inside the opponent’s 40) and 91st in inside-the-10 success rate.

Offensive coordinator Robert Anae, a 30-year coaching veteran, was calling plays for Mendenhall at BYU, both when John Beck was throwing for nearly 4,000 yards in 2005 and 2006 and when Taysom Hill was rushing for nearly 1,500 yards from the QB position in 2013. He has proven adaptable through the years, but with Bryce Perkins behind center in 2018, his offense skewed more Hill than Beck.

Perkins threw for 2,680 yards, and not counting sacks he rushed for 1,124 yards (6.2 per carry) as well. Ellis lacked in explosiveness, but he and Perkins combined for a 48 percent success rate, and Zaccheaus provided 48 percent as a quick-strike receiving option as well.

Perkins is back, and maybe that’s enough to maintain this burgeoning identity. But last year’s supporting cast has a lot to prove. Leading returning rusher PK Kier’s success rate was a ghastly 23 percent, and leading returning slot man Tavares Kelly was at 29 percent.

Luckily, Perkins still has Hasise Dubois and Joe Reed. Dubois was another quick-strike option, producing a 59 percent success rate out wide, and if the offense was making a big play, it was likely coming from Reed, who averaged 18.4 yards per catch with a 65 percent success rate. Granted, he had the element of surprise on his side — he only caught more than two passes in two games — but he’s got the athleticism for a breakout season.

Others have explosiveness potential. Junior Terrell Jana caught only 11 balls last year but was second on the team in averaging 13.7 yards per catch, and he sped 64 yards for a touchdown in the spring game. Plus, UVA recently landed a commitment from Richmond grad transfer Dejon Brissett, who averaged 14.2 yards per catch in 2017 and was averaging 19.4 last season before an injury three games in.

Kier missed most of spring with a concussion, and another developmental story emerged in his absence: sophomore Wayne Taulapapa, a low-three-star recruit, finished spring as the top back. We don’t yet know if Taulapapa stood out because he was legitimately strong, or because no one else stood out, but once you develop a reputation for unearthing diamonds, you get the benefit of the doubt.

Taulapapa, Kier, and whoever else will be running behind a young and reshaped line. The Cavaliers suffered few glitches and negative plays in run blocking, but only 2.5 starters return, and there are no seniors and, including Penn State transfer Alex Gellerstedt, only three juniors in the mix for potential playing time.

Mendenhall doesn’t tend to field bad defenses. As either head coach or coordinator, his BYU defenses ranked in the Def. S&P+ top 30 seven times in 13 years, and his last five enjoyed an average ranking of 28th, peaking at ninth in 2012. While it took until his third year for the offense to show signs of life, his defense has improved constantly, from 85th in Mike London’s last year as head coach to 68th, then 37th, then 31st.

Nick Howell has been Mendenhall’s coordinator, in either Provo or Charlottesville, since 2013. Safe to say, they work well together, and they continued UVA’s defensive ascent in 2018 despite having five sophomores and only two seniors among their 10 leading tacklers.

The pass defense was dynamite in 2018. UVA ranked seventh in completion rate allowed and 17th in both passing and passing downs marginal efficiency. Two key members of the secondary, Thornhill and corner Tim Harris, are gone, but Hall, Blount, and Darrius Bratton all return. Only Hall is a senior. This is still going to be a ridiculous secondary.

If this is the year the improvement streak ends (and I’m not betting on it) it will be because of specific turnover in the front seven. The Cavaliers had a merely decent pass rush (51st in sack rate, 58th on passing downs), and the only defender with more than 2.5 sacks (Peace, with 7.5) is gone. If a replacement blitzer — Charles Snowden? Zane Zandier? Matt Gahm? — can’t generate steady pressure, and if the run defense suffers even bigger glitches than last year in Peace’s absence (they were 87th in rushing marginal efficiency, 94th on standard downs), then the secondary won’t get as many opportunities to make plays.

Still, you’re going to give the benefit of the doubt to Mendenhall and Howell here, especially considering a lot of last year’s run glitches came because of a revolving door of injury on the defensive line. Eli Hanback was the only regular lineman to play more than nine games, and Peace and nose tackle Dylan Thompson (7.5 tackles in seven games) are the only major front-seven absences. Continuity barely existed last year, and now there’s quite a bit of it. This could be UVA’s first top-20 defense since 2007.

Mendenhall hasn’t yet solved special teams. After producing three straight top-50 units (per Special Teams S&P+) in his last three seasons at BYU, each of his UVA units have ranked between 89th and 96th.

The main culprit last year was place-kicking, but that had somewhat solved itself by the end of the year. A.J. Mejia struggled mightily, going just 1-for-4 on both PATs and field goals, but replacement Brian Delaney didn’t miss a PAT and went 3-for-4 on FGs longer than 40 yards.

The return game’s got potential. Joe Reed is as explosive on kickoffs as he is as a receiver, and Tavares Kelly showed efficiency potential on punts.

I’m not sure of Virginia’s place in the ACC if or when the league begins to bounce back from last year’s sudden crater. But man oh man, do the Cavaliers have an opportunity in 2019. They are projected 41st overall, and their schedule features six games with a projected win probability of 67 percent or higher, compared to just two games at or below 33 percent.

Split the four tossups (at Pitt, Florida State, at UNC, Virginia Tech), and you’ve matched last year’s win total. Exceed expectations offensively, however, and you give yourself a chance at double digit wins. Depending on Miami’s QB situation, that maybe gives you the Coastal crown.

Mendenhall entered a crowded ACC three years ago and, primarily through development and characteristically strong defense, has quickly crafted one of the most interesting programs in the league. The Cavaliers couldn’t take full advantage of their potential in 2018, but the window of opportunity hasn’t closed yet.

All 2019 preview data to date.