Since the 2002 expansion, the top four teams in wins are the New England Patriots (147), Indianapolis Colts (133), Pittsburgh Steelers (121), and Green Bay Packers (118). In that 12-year span, the Colts and Patriots have won double-digit games in a year 11 times, and the Packers sit third in that group, with eight.
Fantasy football impact: The Packers should maintain their success
When a rash of injuries, a winning record, and a division win can be a “disappointing” season, you know you have a strong franchise. The Packers rarely disappoint. We break down the fantasy implications of their 2014 season.


Basically, there are some teams you expect to be good. (Not the Bills, though; they're the only team with zero double-digit win seasons since the expansion.) That's why it felt nigh-on disastrous in 2013 when, spending half the season without a decent quarterback you've probably heard of, the Packers fell to 8-7-1 and barely squeaked into the playoffs. They lose a great quarterback (Aaron Rodgers), a good tight end (Jermichael Finley), and an upper-end receiver (Randall Cobb) for extended periods - and that's only from the skill players - and win their division.
I watch a bunch of serialized TV shows. Often times, such shows get to a point where a particular plotline is basically over, but not enough pieces have been put in place for the subsequent plotline, so they have an episode that is viewed as a placeholder. You want the placeholder to be decent in its own right, of course, but everyone involved knows that isn’t the episode that will be submitted to any awards shows; it just wants to be decent, hold attention, and set up what comes next.
Fantasy Football
Fantasy Football
In a sense, 2013 was the Packers' placeholder episode. It introduced a new character (Eddie Lacy); it closed out some old storylines (James Jones); it sent off a beloved character that never quite worked in heartbreaking fashion (Finley). In this analogy, 2014 sets up as the Packers' sweeps week, the time when everything culminates.
(On that note, how “wannabe Grey’s Anatomy” was Finley’s 2013? Dude never quite reached his potential with Green Bay. He started 2013 looking pretty good, only for an ugly, sympathy-inducing calamity to put an end to all of it. Now he’s a free agent. Tell me that isn’t one heck of a correlation for T.R. Knight’s tenure on Grey’s, and yes even as I write that I’m aware the Venn diagram of fantasy football and Grey’s Anatomy watchers doesn’t feature much overlap.)
Anyway, the Packers for 2014. Let’s take a trip:
Quarterback
Rodgers was limited to eight games in 2013 (I'm just calling his barely-played-before-getting-hurt Week 9 appearance as "not a game," because it's easier) because of a broken collarbone. In those eight games, he put up 20 or more fantasy points four times - half. Drew Brees put up 20-plus eight times in 16 games. Cam Newton did it six. Andrew Luck four. Matthew Stafford six.
I mean, it can't be a surprise for anyone, but still: Per game, Aaron Rodgers was still Aaron Rodgers last year. If you assume he's healthy for 2014 - and there's no real reason not to-he's still a top three quarterback at worst. I ranked him third at the position (behind Peyton Manning and Brees) and 15th overall, and if you wanted to take him over Brees, I wouldn't really argue with you.
Running back
I wasn't convinced on Lacy entering the season last year. Between the Packers' penchant for throwing the ball and the general underwhelmingness of Alabama running backs (or maybe just Mark Ingram, I dunno) in the NFL before that, I pegged Lacy a few spots lower than most did.
To be honest, I'm not altogether sure that idea was wrong, in and of itself. Lacy became a different running back after Rodgers' injury; he topped 100 yards in a game only once while the quarterback was healthy, but did it three times without him. He topped out at 17.2 fantasy points (and averaged 13.48) before Rodgers' injury, but topped that number three times (and averaged 14.46) afterward. He scored three touchdowns before Rodgers got hurt; he scored eight afterward. Sure, when Matt Flynn started against the Lions and the entire team imploded, Lacy wasn't anything worthwhile, but in general, he went from a good-not-great fantasy running back for the first half of the season to a No. 1 option.
The question becomes, then, was there correlation or was there casuation? You would expect a rookie running back to improve as the season goes on; what if Rodgers’ injury just happened to coincide with Lacy’s natural improvement?
I tend to think Lacy will still be fine; I ranked him fifth (both among running backs and overall) for 2014, something like the Edgerrin James to Rodgers' Manning. I could see an argument for Marshawn Lynch, Alfred Morris, Le'Veon Bell, Zac Stacy over him if someone wanted to pose it, but he's an RB1 either way.
Behind Lacy, the team still has James Starks and Johnathan Franklin - both of whom had hundred-yard games last year - if needed, and fullback John Kuhn will surely end up with the occasional goal-line rush, as the team is wont to do. I ranked Starks 41st among running backs (121 overall) and didn't rank the others, but you don't really want to bother with any of the three unless you have to.
Wide Receivers
After having years of Greg Jennings and Jordy Nelson controlling the receiving in Green Bay, with Cobb and Jones floating in in recent seasons, the Green Bay receiving corps found some turmoil in 2013. Jennings left as a free agent. Jones was hurt for some of the year, and inconsistent when he was out there. Cobb played in only six regular-season games. Nelson was generally good - topping 1,300 yards - but not his normal consistent self.
After the season, the Packers let Jones leave to sign with the Oakland Raiders, leaving Nelson, Cobb, and Jarrett Boykin as the team's new triumvirate. Nelson, who still managed 1,300 yards and eight touchdowns in a sub-peak year, came in as my No. 7 receiver, No. 25 overall. Cobb, who broke his leg in Week 6 a year ago, was really good when he played; in five-and-a-half games, Cobb scored four touchdowns and topped 500 yards from scrimmage. He scored double-digit fantasy points four times in his five full games.
Despite two touchdowns and 55 yards in Week 17 - and appearing in the team’s playoff game - Cobb didn’t appear to be at full strength after his injury return at the end of 2013. That said, there’s no real reason to think a full offseason wouldn’t be enough time for him to bounce back. I have Cobb as my No. 26 wide receiver (No. 61) overall, and if he stays healthy he’s more likely to climb up that list than fall down it.
Boykin, meanwhile, played might-as-well-be-not-at-all in his 2012 rookie year. It looked like he wasn’t likely to be a big part of the offense at the start of last year, either, but injuries to Cobb and Jones meant the team had to look his way. He came through for a team that was running out of receivers, with two hundred-yard games, almost 700 yards, and three touchdowns over the season.
With Jones gone, Boykin should be a full-fledged part of the Packers offense in 2014. That said, there's still a reason he went undrafted and got cut from the Jaguars before finding himself in Green Bay. Boykin is talented, but he's not up to the class of his former cohort. I have him ranked as my 46th receiver - 124 overall - meaning he's not likely to be worth much more than a depth play.
Tight End
I include tight end in this piece because it's come to be expected; the team appears likely to enter next season with Andrew Quarless as its top tight end; there are enough pressing needs at non-skill positions that it seems unlikely they will use a high draft pick on a tight end (or much of any skill players, really). And I'm sure Mr. Quarless is a nice enough guy, but if you're running him out there regularly in fantasy, something has gone a bit wrong somewhere.
Remember, Green Bay’s 2013 was a placeholder episode in the TV show that is the Packers. If the analogy holds true, that means there is a lot in store for the team in 2014. Assuming the rash of injuries that rampaged through the team in 2013 has run its course, there ought to be a lot of fantasy goodness to be had.











