Just for fun, here’s a chart of the top 15 fantasy quarterbacks last year, with total points scored and their end-of-year ownership percentage in ESPN leagues.
Fantasy football impact: Can Andy Dalton repeat his 2013 fantasy performance?
The Bengals quarterback was a big scorer in 2013, but it came in an unconventional manner. Can he do it again? We break down the fantasy implications.


| Quarterback | 2013 Fantasy Points | ESPN Ownership Percentage |
| Peyton Manning | 406 | 100.0 |
| Drew Brees | 348 | 100.0 |
| Cam Newton | 282 | 100.0 |
| Andrew Luck | 279 | 99.7 |
| Andy Dalton | 277 | 60.3 |
| Philip Rivers | 276 | 95.5 |
| Matthew Stafford | 267 | 100.0 |
| Russell Wilson | 256 | 100.0 |
| Colin Kaepernick | 253 | 98.2 |
| Tony Romo | 252 | 93.0 |
| Nick Foles | 251 | 88.4 |
| Ben Roethlisberger | 248 | 88.7 |
| Tom Brady | 241 | 100.0 |
| Matt Ryan | 239 | 89.6 |
| Alex Smith | 238 | 70.6 |
If you’re me (or, since I’m giving a guided tour of this column, if you’re controlled by me), the part of that chart that stands out the most is the number 60.3. Andy Dalton, despite having the fifth-most fantasy points at the position last year, despite being only one good play away from third place, was owned in just over half of ESPN leagues by year’s end. He was started in less than a quarter of leagues.
In theory, that’s a weird happening, the result of underrating a productive player. In practice, though, it’s remarkably easy to explain.
Dalton had three games last year in which he put up 30 or more fantasy points. Only Peyton Manning and Drew Brees (five each) had more. So, you know, bully for that. On the flip side of that coin, Dalton had four games of fewer than 10 fantasy points. Among regular starters, only Joe Flacco (six), Eli Manning (six), Geno Smith (five), and Chad Henne (five) had more.
In other words, Dalton had great games, but he pretty much balanced them with extreme clunkers. He put up 20-29 points only two times all season; Flacco and Eli Manning were the only top-20 quarterbacks with fewer.
Fantasy Football
Fantasy Football
In the past, I've recommended high-and-low fantasy players like Vincent Jackson or Fred Jackson because you can always balance an unpredictable WR or RB with a more reliable running mate. Vincent Jackson alongside A.J. Green means that Jackson's bad weeks don't hurt much, but his huge weeks give you a win.
But there’s no one to balance against a boom-or-bust quarterback. If you ran Andy Dalton out there every week, you’d have some wildly successful weeks, but you’d also have some weeks were he basically lost you your matchup single-handedly. Interestingly, the 2012 iteration of Dalton was just about the polar opposite. He never exceeded 24 fantasy points in a game, but had at least 20 seven different times. It was only good enough for 12th among quarterbacks.
For the Cincinnati Bengals in 2014, Dalton will need to be more boom and less bust. Heck, considering he's entering the last year of his contract and the team still hasn't signed him long-term, he'll need to do that for himself, too.
The pros and cons of Dalton are well-known. He has the fourth-most wins through his first three seasons and has never missed a start. All of that, and yet you’d be hard-pressed to find many who thinks Dalton is much beyond a red-headed version of Alex Smith in that he is competent enough to get a team to the playoffs, so long as the rest of the roster is really good, but no one you’ll win a title with.
Even with his often-impressive production last year, I can’t rank Dalton as a QB1, or even particularly close to one. Even if he repeats last year exactly, the lows for a quarterback matter so much more than the highs that he would be a concern, and repeating last year seems unlikely.
I rank Dalton as my No. 16 quarterback for the season, but he's closer to the Nos. 19 and 20 -- Carson Palmer and Joe Flacco -- than he is to Jay Cutler at No. 15. There's a huge gap between quarterbacks 15 and 16, and Dalton's on the wrong side of it.
Wide Receivers
A.J. Green's first two years in Cincinnati were very much in the mold of Larry Fitzgerald's or Calvin Johnson's times with their teams; lonely. Green needed a running-mate pass-catcher in the worst sort of way.
Most would have you believe that he found one last year. Marvin Jones went for 712 yards and 10 touchdowns and while the yardage is nothing special, 10 touchdowns is 10 touchdowns and only nine players caught more. On the other hand, a 712-yard total is nothing special -- Jerome Simpson in 2011 and Jermaine Gresham in 2012 both had more -- and four of Jones’ 10 touchdowns came in Week 8, which was also his lone hundred-yard game of the year.
In other words, without Jones' huge game against the Jets he had 590 yards and six touchdowns in 15 games, all very pedestrian totals. You don't get to just ignore games willy-nilly, but outliers are outliers.
Green is still an elite receiver, and he’s getting better by the year, with his yards increasing each of his three seasons, and his touchdowns staying at 11 from 2012 to 2013. He was the No. 14 wide receiver in 2011 and has been No. 4 each of the last two years. This despite a mediocre quarterback and a middling offense around him leaving him as his team’s only real option.
I rank Green as my No. 3 wide receiver entering the season, No. 12 overall. He, Demaryius Thomas, Dez Bryant, and Brandon Marshall are all in a lump in the 2-5 slots among wide receivers, so personal preference there, but I go Thomas-Green-Bryant-Marshall.
Jones, meanwhile, finished 22nd at the position last year, but I can’t rank him even in my top 50. There are just too many ways for his production to fall off. I’d slot him in the mid-60s at the position, barely inside the top 200 overall.
The Bengals also have Mohamed Sanu, Dane Sanzenbacher, and seventh-round 2014 pick James Wright at receiver, but none of them profile as fantasy-relevant players this season.
Running Backs
As a rookie in 2013, Giovani Bernard followed a two-point fantasy outing with a 17-point one. He followed a one-pointer with a 21-pointer. A five came after a 15; another 15 preceded a six. In other words, Bernard was a very good rookie -- he finished 18th overall at the position -- but he was far from a reliable week-to-week guy.
This year, I expect far more reliability and consistency from Bernard. Part of that is because Bernard is likely to develop in his second year. But also, he battled BenJarvus Green-Ellis for touches in 2013 and that just doesn’t seem liable to happen this year. Green-Ellis got 220 carries to Bernard’s 170 last year. This year, Green-Ellis is in the last year of his three-year contract. There were rumors, with the team using a second-round pick on Jeremy Hill, that Green-Ellis would be in line for a roster cut. While that hasn’t happened yet, I wouldn’t rule it out as a training-camp occurrence.
Even if Green-Ellis stays on the roster in a depth/mentoring sort of role, he is who he is at this point. He’s unremarkable: a couple yards at a time with the ball even as his famous fumbleproofness has faded in recent years with five fumbles in the last two season.
Bernard had both the highest ceiling and highest floor of all Bengals running backs. His backup is likely to be Hill, drafted out of LSU (coincidentally, the wide receiver Wright is also out of LSU). I am one of a thousand people who is confused as to why the Bengals took Hill over someone like Carlos Hyde, but what's done is done. Hill profiles as basically a young version of Green-Ellis, a bruiser more than a speedster.
Hill has also had more than his share of non-football issues (including a guilty plea on battery charges in April of last year), which could be why the team has held on to Green-Ellis. Cutting one running back just before losing the other to non-football events would be ... frustrating.
Regardless, the Bengals look like they’ll be entering the season with Bernard solidly in the No. 1 running back role and Hill as his backup. I rank Bernard as my No. 18 running back, rising a few spots in a PPR league. Hill comes in in the mid-40s, 120ish overall. Green-Ellis is, right now, only an afterthought in fantasy and he’s barely even that.
Tight Ends
Tyler Eifert and Jermaine Gresham had superficially similar seasons in 2013. Eifert, the rookie, went for 445 yards and two touchdowns while Gresham, in his fourth season, had 458 and four. But they are tight ends moving in opposite direction; Gresham has never developed into the tight end he was envisioned as being when he was a first-round pick in 2010 while Eifert, the team’s 2013 first-rounder (interestingly, both went 21st overall), is seen as the on-the-rise tight end.
Moving forward, Eifert is likely to be the guy the team leans more heavily on, and that should be reflected in his fantasy usage. Neither is startable in shallow leagues, but I slot Eifert as my No. 19 tight end and I don’t rank Gresham at all.
Miss out on any of the team pieces so far? Catch up here:
| AFC EAST | NFC EAST | |
| Buffalo Bills | Dallas Cowboys | |
| Miami Dolphins | New York Giants | |
| New England Patriots | Philadelphia Eagles | |
| New York Jets | Washington | |
| AFC NORTH | NFC NORTH | |
| Baltimore Ravens | Chicago Bears | |
| Cincinnati Bengals (Aloha) | Detroit Lions | |
| Cleveland Browns | Green Bay Packers | |
| Pittsburgh Steelers | Minnesota Vikings | |
| AFC SOUTH | NFC SOUTH | |
| Houston Texans | Atlanta Falcons | |
| Indianapolis Colts | Carolina Panthers | |
| Jacksonville Jaguars | New Orleans Saints | |
| Tennessee Titans | Tampa Bay Buccaneers | |
| AFC WEST | NFC WEST | |
| Denver Broncos | Arizona Cardinals | |
| Kansas City Chiefs | San Francisco 49ers | |
| Oakland Raiders | Seattle Seahawks | |
| San Diego Chargers | St. Louis Rams |











