Skip to main content
Come Fan with UsTuesday, August 4, 2026

Michael Vick injury: Eagles QB listed doubtful for Sunday

Michael Vick is doubtful for Sunday’s game against the Packers. With Nick Foles coming off a historic performance, Vick may not see the field for the rest of the season.

Michael Vick is listed as doubtful on the Philadelphia Eagles' injury report for Sunday's game against the Green Bay Packers. Vick was reportedly a full participant in practice Friday after being limited Wednesday and Thursday with a nagging hamstring injury. He has a remote chance of suiting up in Week 10, however, likely making Nick Foles the team's starting quarterback once more.

More from Bleeding Green Nation: Eagles-Packers final injury report

Even if Vick was 100 percent healthy, it seems likely that he would have stayed on the sideline this week. Foles had a perfect passer rating against the Oakland Raiders in Week 9, and tied an NFL record with seven touchdown passes. He will be hard to keep off the field, barring a dud performance or another injury setback.

Keepers Week 10

Matt Ufford offers you fantasy advice on Aaron Rodgers, finding a sub for Jamaal Charles and more.

The Eagles’ quarterback battle has been a constant story throughout the season, to the chagrin of head coach Chip Kelly. For the most part, Kelly has been able to avoid making a decision. Vick and Foles have more or less traded places on the inactive list throughout the year.

Despite the doubtful designation, Vick appears to be close to returning, meaning both quarterbacks will be able to dress at the same time. Kelly will have to choose the better man, and coming of a historic performance, Foles has all of the momentum at the moment.

More from SB Nation NFL

Vikings win but lose Ponder | RG3 shines in Washington’s loss

Keepers: How to replace Aaron Rodgers, Jamaal Charles and more

NFL Week 10 picks: Hazing your way to victory

Celebrity Hot Tub: The road to 0-16 | Uffsides: Week 10 previews

Breaking Madden: One team, 46 guys named Johnson | More

See More: