Skip to main content
Come Fan with UsSaturday, June 20, 2026

2016 Texas Bowl stats preview: Texas A&M vs. Kansas State advanced tale of the tape

Texas A&M Aggies (8-4) vs. Kansas State Wildcats (8-4)

December 28, 2016 ( 9:00 PM ET, ESPN )
Spread: Texas A&M -2
S&P+ Projection: Texas A&M (32.1-27.5)

Confused? Check out the advanced-stats glossary here.
Statistical profiles index.
Full Football Outsiders F/+ rankings can be found here.

The Basics
Category Texas A&M Kansas State
S&P+ (Rk) 19 38
Category Texas A&M offense Kansas State defense Kansas State offense Texas A&M defense
Yards per play (Rk) 6.17 (27) 5.49 (63) 5.41 (75) 5.35 (54)
Yards per game (Rk) 469.4 (25) 375.4 (43) 383.8 (89) 455.9 (105)
Points per possession (Rk) 2.47 (46) 1.81 (35) 2.76 (28) 1.63 (20)
Category Texas A&M offense Kansas State defense Kansas State offense Texas A&M defense
S&P+ (Rk) 35.9 (27) 25.8 (39) 32.8 (46) 24.6 (37)
Rushing S&P+ (Rk) 113.3 (31) 114.1 (26) 114.4 (29) 103.2 (56)
Passing S&P+ (Rk) 107.4 (49) 100.6 (60) 84.2 (111) 103.7 (51)
Standard Downs S&P+ (Rk) 103.8 (57) 104.8 (42) 105.3 (51) 99.6 (63)
Passing Downs S&P+ (Rk) 126.1 (15) 105.9 (49) 95.1 (88) 115.7 (27)
Q1 S&P+ (Rk) 112.9 (42) 112.9 (30) 116.1 (33) 106.5 (43)
Q2 S&P+ (Rk) 107.6 (52) 110.9 (39) 99.9 (76) 112.3 (33)
Q3 S&P+ (Rk) 113.7 (33) 102.1 (53) 102.1 (63) 116.6 (20)
Q4 S&P+ (Rk) 110.5 (30) 94.8 (83) 99.0 (79) 91.1 (101)
Five biggest advantages* (according to the advanced stats)

* or smallest disadvantages

Texas A&M

  1. Second Down S&P+ (No. 10 defense vs. No. 93 offense)
  2. Passing Downs Explosiveness (IsoPPP) (No. 22 defense vs. No. 104 offense)
  3. Passing Explosiveness (IsoPPP) (No. 44 defense vs. No. 122 offense)
  4. Passing Downs S&P+ (No. 27 defense vs. No. 88 offense)
  5. Passing S&P+ (No. 51 defense vs. No. 111 offense)

Kansas State

  1. Short-Yardage Rushing (No. 7 defense vs. No. 97 offense)
  2. Standard Downs Efficiency (Success Rate) (No. 17 offense vs. No. 71 defense)
  3. Field Position (No. 17 defense vs. No. 61 offense)
  4. Rushing Efficiency (Success Rate) (No. 16 offense vs. No. 59 defense)
  5. First Down S&P+ (No. 40 offense vs. No. 80 defense)
Five Factors
Category Texas A&M offense Kansas State defense Kansas State offense Texas A&M defense
EXPLOSIVENESS 1.39 (18) 1.23 (51) 1.10 (127) 1.21 (36)
EFFICIENCY 41.2% (81) 43.3% (77) 48.6% (11) 41.8% (58)
FIELD POSITION 29.8 (61) 27.0 (17) 31.8 (29) 28.7 (54)
FINISHING DRIVES 5.0 (22) 4.4 (57) 4.9 (28) 3.6 (11)
TURNOVER MARGIN EXPECTED:
Texas A&M 5.84 (20)
Kansas State 5.26 (25)
ACTUAL
Texas A&M 5 (31)
Kansas State 11 (6)
Offensive Footprint
Category (Rk) Texas A&M offense Kansas State offense
Adj. Pace 1.0 (54) -1.8 (76)
Plays per game 76.1 (47) 70.9 (90)
Possessions per game 14.3 (8) 11.7 (123)
Std. Downs Run Rate 56.9% (84) 73.4% (10)
Pass. Downs Run Rate 33.9% (61) 33.2% (70)
% of solo tackles 72.8% (79) 87.4% (3)
Defensive Footprint
Category (Rk) Texas A&M defense Kansas State defense
Std. Downs Run Rate 59.3% (69) 47.6% (125)
Pass. Downs Run Rate 33.7% (65) 30.4% (97)
Overall Havoc Rate 18.9% (17) 16.7% (42)
Front 7 Havoc Rate 11.7% (19) 10.9% (29)
DB Havoc Rate 7.2% (35) 5.9% (81)
PD to INC 36.4% (32) 34.6% (51)

When Texas A&M has the ball…

Standard Downs
Texas A&M Offense Kansas State Defense
Avg. Rk Avg. Rk Edge
Standard Downs S&P+ 103.8 57 104.8 42 Kansas State
Standard Downs Success Rate 44.0 106 47.6 66 Kansas State
Standard Downs IsoPPP 1.20 35 1.12 66 Texas A&M
SD Line Yards per Carry 3.07 59 2.65 29 Kansas State
SD Sack Rate 3.5% 35 4.8% 65 Texas A&M
Passing Downs
Texas A&M Offense Kansas State Defense
Avg. Rk Avg. Rk Edge
Passing Downs S&P+ 126.1 15 105.9 49 Texas A&M
Passing Downs Success Rate 34.8 30 33.3 90 Texas A&M big
Passing Downs IsoPPP 1.96 16 1.53 31 Texas A&M
PD Line Yards per Carry 4.02 10 3.53 97 Texas A&M big
PD Sack Rate 4.6% 16 9.7% 23

When Kansas State has the ball…

Standard Downs
Kansas State Offense Texas A&M Defense
Avg. Rk Avg. Rk Edge
Standard Downs S&P+ 105.3 51 99.6 63 Kansas State
Standard Downs Success Rate 54.9 7 47.4 61 Kansas State big
Standard Downs IsoPPP 0.96 123 1.11 73 Texas A&M big
SD Line Yards per Carry 3.29 24 2.88 54 Kansas State
SD Sack Rate 5.2% 72 6.3% 33 Texas A&M
Passing Downs
Kansas State Offense Texas A&M Defense
Avg. Rk Avg. Rk Edge
Passing Downs S&P+ 95.1 88 115.7 27 Texas A&M big
Passing Downs Success Rate 33.6 37 30.0 51 Kansas State
Passing Downs IsoPPP 1.62 106 1.65 9 Texas A&M big
PD Line Yards per Carry 3.52 38 2.68 23 Texas A&M
PD Sack Rate 9% 86 9.4% 26 Texas A&M big

Stats via SportSource Analytics

College Football
The NCAA can appeal Brendan Sorsby’s shocking reinstatement, but Texas law isn’t on their sideThe NCAA can appeal Brendan Sorsby’s shocking reinstatement, but Texas law isn’t on their side
College Football

A big can of worms has been opened in college sports

By Mark Schofield
College Football
Here’s your first look at ‘College Football 27’ and ‘Madden 27’Here’s your first look at ‘College Football 27’ and ‘Madden 27’
College Football

Mascot game! Tush push!

By James Dator
NFL
Brendan Sorsby’s gambling allegations could end his college football career. Is NFL Supplemental Draft next?Brendan Sorsby’s gambling allegations could end his college football career. Is NFL Supplemental Draft next?
NFL

Brendan Sorsby calls out NCAA hypocrisy as his football future is uncertain

By Mark Schofield
College Football
NAACP urges black athletes to reject recruiting in racially gerrymandered statesNAACP urges black athletes to reject recruiting in racially gerrymandered states
College Football

The NAACP is asking athletes to take up the fight for voting rights.

By James Dator
College Football
Oregon coach asks recruits about their favorite ice cream, and it actually makes senseOregon coach asks recruits about their favorite ice cream, and it actually makes sense
College Football

Oregon coaches have a strange question for potential recruits.

By Mark Schofield
NFL
Why Jeremiyah Love brings top-5 value to NFL Draft as a RBWhy Jeremiyah Love brings top-5 value to NFL Draft as a RB
NFL

The Notre Dame star is the rare running back worth a top-10 or even top-5 pick.

By Mark Schofield